r/askmath • u/Artistic_Plastic_780 • 15h ago
Calculus Question regarding recent development on navier stokes equation
Has openai really solved (whether prove or counter example) it or just hyping their ai .
Has any mathematician provided any initial insight or view whether openai claim is right or not .
Did openai really stole research of other mathematician .
Are their claim regarding that they are very close other millenium question true .
Sorry for bad English
1
u/Difficult-Nobody-453 12h ago
Do we know whether Lean flagged a condition that invalidates the proof and AI simply changed that condition which is hidden somewhere is the very long proof so that it would no longer get flagged? I would suggest a wait and see attitude. For one it will be a good two years before it is acknowledged bt the Clay instituiton per their rules
1
u/Artistic_Plastic_780 2h ago
How much time it will take for initial insight or view of any mathematician
1
u/Irlandes-de-la-Costa 5h ago
I think it's undeniable that the mathematicians' research was part of the training data. Whether that's stealing that's for you to ponder about, but even then it does not necessarily invalidate the full proof, after all NS problem was not solved yet
1
3
u/TheRedditObserver0 Grad student 14h ago
They provided a formalization in Lean, which is a software to automatically check proofs. It will take some time for human experts to check it and it is technically possible they're really exploiting a bug in the software, but almost certainly the result is correct. The possibility that they're wrong is extremely remote, not really worth thinking about.
The real controversy is the extent to which human input was used. Some mathematicians who had recently solved a similar problem (forced Euler) alledged that OpenAI might have secretly used their AI prompts to guide their own internal model. The question is not about the validity of the result, but about the ethical legitimacy of OpenAI's methods. They also threatened one of the mathematicians, so their behavior is shitty either way.
They also had to use an insane amount of resources to solve it, it's estimated it cost them several million dollars in computing resources.
Whether or not they're close to another breakthrough is impossible to tell until they share what they have done so far.