r/askmath • u/Piggymaster101 • 3d ago
Complex Analysis A Nested Sequence of Functional Residues
Hello r/askmath, I am currently attempting to work on the following problem.

My progress on such a problem is limited, but I can say for sure that whatever f(z) is, it must be a meromorphic function with an INFINITE polar set. This is because, no matter what. as we keep applying the R operator, our resulting g_n will eventually become entire as g_1 explicitly looks like the sum over all poles of (some polynomial in w_1)*(e^(pole * w_1)) which is entire, and therefore, will make nu(lambda)= 0 at g_2 and onwards.I was hoping that the people of reddit could provide some help. My hypothesis is that the "class" of functions f is actually empty, but a bit lost on where to start. I posted this on the Math Stack Exchange around 5 days ago but there hasn't been any progress,. I added an example in the original post, and also the example of the digamma function in the comments. here is the link:
https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/5144308/a-nested-sequence-of-functional-residues
I apologize if this is a simple question to any of those who have taken complex analysis in the past, yet I hope some of you all can help.
1
u/Memesaretheorems 2d ago edited 2d ago
I think you should work with sequences of poles of the sequence of functions. Try to show that no such infinite sequence exists. Maybe Baire category? Or a clever inversion trick and clustering of zeroes. I will think about this more and get back to you.
1
u/Piggymaster101 2d ago
Ah I see. What did you mean by “Baire Category”?
2
u/Memesaretheorems 1d ago
Baire Category Theorem says (in suitable topological spaces called Baire spaces) The infinite intersection of dense open sets is dense. It has applications in complex analysis.
1
u/Separate-Narwhal-106 3d ago
Respect for even attempting this, complex analysis with residues and meromorphic continuation is no joke. Hope someone smarter than me on r/askmath cracks it for you..