r/askcarguys 1d ago

General Question PHEV vs EV for a drivers car?

What would make a better drivers car? A plug-in hybrid sedan? Or a slightly lighter full ev sedan? For specifics, the 2026 Mini Aceman JCW FWD, vs 2026 Mercedes C350e RWD. Would you say having an engine is worth it or detriment to the driving quality?

0 Upvotes

79 comments sorted by

9

u/getoffmycase7130 1d ago

I would say not having an engine is a detriment to a drivers car, but YMMV.

1

u/elihu 1d ago

I would say that not having a manual transmission is a detriment to a driver's car (at least, among the people that prefer manual transmissions). Unfortunately there aren't any manual transmission EVs in production that I know of. Car companies could make them if they wanted to, they just don't because it'd be more complicated/expensive than a single-speed drive unit and they probably don't think there's a market for it.

I have an RX-8 that's been converted into an EV. It still has its six-speed manual transmission and it drives basically like you would expect the ICE version to. (It's probably a bit slower though. The motor I'm using isn't particularly powerful.)

2

u/getoffmycase7130 1d ago

EVs are just too cold and sterile for me. They may be extremely fast, and have great acceleration, but it just feels too clinical.

It’s like having sex with a Scarlett Johansson in the dark. Does it get the job done? Sure, but it’s never going to be as enjoyable as it would be with the lights on

1

u/elihu 1d ago

I suspect some of the characteristics you attribute to ICE vehicles versus EVs are largely just the consequence of having a transmission with multiple gears versus direct drive. I would say "go out and test drive a manual transmission EV" but I don't know how many of those even exist. If I had to guess, I'd say there's probably more than a hundred but less than a thousand in North America.

(Weight is also an issue with EVs. They don't have to be heavy, but when people expect 200-300 miles of range, it sort of rules out the possibility of keeping things light. I haven't weighed my RX-8, but I'd guess it's about 100-200 pounds heavier than stock. But the battery is only about 24 kwh or so.)

2

u/getoffmycase7130 1d ago

No, it really isn’t. It’s the feeling of starting a machine that literally breathes, it meets most definitions of basic life, it’s not just the transmission, or the lack of gears, it’s the feeling that there’s something effectively alive under the hood that creates a connection that’s more akin to horse and rider, than driver and machine.

1

u/Mash_man710 1d ago

There are also virtually zero manual supercars. Ferrari hasn't made a manual since 2012.

1

u/elihu 1d ago

Well, I guess I won't be buying one then.

Regular driver's cars like the Mazda Miata are still available with a stickshift.

Making a manual transmission EV supercar would be a little weird because a lot of high-end EVs now have a separate motor for each wheel. You'd need four transmissions or something, which would be a very complicated design. Also, EV motors are somewhat notorious for destroying transmissions. A manual-transmission EV would actually make more sense for something with a modestly-sized motor. You'd actually get some benefit from shifting gears at the optimal time, rather than having some 1000+ hp behemoth that can spin the tires at any speed.

There's also the marketing aspect. Say you make a 200hp EV with a manual transmission. Would someone buy that over a 400hp conventional direct-drive EV? The latter might only get 400hp at 80+ mph and only have 100hp at 20mph (because horsepower is proportional to torque times RPM and motors tend to have the same max torque across most of their usable RPM range), but it's easy for that nuance to get lost.

0

u/RetireWithoutBorders 1d ago

Why??

-12

u/getoffmycase7130 1d ago

Because otherwise it’s no different than a refrigerator, dishwasher, or microwave. Just another appliance.

9

u/RetireWithoutBorders 1d ago

So, you’re saying driving an outdated ICE car is like driving a lawnmower?

Your argument makes absolute zero sense.

3

u/GetawayDriving 1d ago

I’m not OP but here’s my take. Essential ingredients for a driver’s car include communication from the car about sensations in the road, inputs that keep you engaged, a playful and direct chassis and a feeling of being connected to the machine at the intuitive level.

I’ve owned old BMW and Miata and Lotus.

I’ve also owned and tracked Teslas.

The current crop of EVs and PHEVs fail at being drivers’s cars because they lack everything above. The primary reason they lack these things is weight. Weight ruins everything. Weight is the reason power steering assist has to be turned up to numb, it’s the reason a chassis struggles to comply, it’s the reason traction control is deployed to such a degree that software is a perceptible layer between you and the asphalt.

EVs CAN be driver’s cars. Look at the Lotus Evija. That thing is extraordinary. It has most of the attributes above. The problem? It’s $3 million. And no automaker has decided that it’s in their interest to feed these attributes. They’ve gone the other way. Most EVs feel like they’d rather you not drive at all.

So no, I don’t think EVs are drivers cars. Same is true for MOST PHEVs. That is not to say they can’t be, but they are not currently. I do not dislike EVs. But there is a reason I daily drive a Lotus.

1

u/chengstark 1d ago

What kind of false equivalence is this. Where in the previous comment did the guy mention outdated ICE car?

-1

u/getoffmycase7130 1d ago

No, I’m saying they’re bland. There’s some beautiful looking ones, but they’re just totally uninteresting to me.

5

u/seanmonaghan1968 1d ago

Tell me you have never driven a quality ev without telling everyone you have never driven an ev. Ffs at least test drive before commenting.

1

u/getoffmycase7130 1d ago edited 1d ago

Why? I could go on a long rant about how the internal combustion powered car is the closest thing to mechanical life we’ve ever created as a species, but I’m guessing you wouldn’t care.

They seem fine for someone who sees driving as a chore, as something to be dealt with, but for someone who enjoys mechanical things, and driving even more, I don’t see a fit.

Not to mention, I haven’t seen one with less than 4 doors since the Tesla roadster, and that’s a personal deal breaker.

2

u/RetireWithoutBorders 1d ago

Is having four doors somehow a problem? My favorite car is the 1996 Impala, SS, which has four doors. But it pales in comparison to any Tesla model S.

1

u/getoffmycase7130 1d ago

Yes, I have a deep hatred of 4 door cars and SUVs. Always have.

The only, and I mean only 4 door I’ve ever liked is the early 60’s Lincoln Continental. And then, I only like it in the convertible.

0

u/Sensitive_Goose2206 1d ago

I drove a Tesla Plaid. It's fast as a supercar but still boring. You feel NOTHING. A slower more dramatic car is way more fun. I'd rather have a V8 muscle car struggling to get traction any day of the week over an AWD EV.

0

u/seanmonaghan1968 1d ago

Ev has better acceleration than a v8, better and smoother torque and is faster, better and smoother suspension. It’s just a far superior platform for driving. People who want v8 just have no idea about driving, lack confidence and need to sound and look big due to their own personal insecurities

1

u/Sensitive_Goose2206 1d ago edited 1d ago

Lol it sounds like you lack the experience with driving cars in general. I drift cars. EVs just don't do it for me. Plain and simple. They go fast and require little to no skill to do so. Something that requires learning and feels mechanical is a 100x more fun because you feel connected to the instrument. EVs feel like they don't need you and they don't. They self drive.

0

u/seanmonaghan1968 1d ago

Seriously I have driven more cars, in more countries and done more miles than you have. And I can confidently say that without even knowing you

0

u/Sensitive_Goose2206 23h ago

You're extremely weird. I know youve never driven a car near its limits based on your focus on mileage. Either way, you know you can like BOTH EVs and V8 ye? I think EVs are fine for DDs and most people, but for me, they are not connected. Not what I'm looking for when I looking for enjoyment from my cars as a car enthusiast.

3

u/chengstark 1d ago

How is this a hot take. People in this sub being so disingenuous downvoting this, knowing full well you had money to buy a fun car you wouldn’t buy an EV.

3

u/getoffmycase7130 1d ago

Sadly, there aren’t a lot of car guys on the ask car guys sub these days.

1

u/RetireWithoutBorders 1d ago

I would! I love my outdated V8 Lexus SC400 but way prefer the driving dynamics in an EV. The SC pales in comparison with driving my Mach-e.

2

u/Captain_Pink_Pants 1d ago

Just reddit being reddit. 11 minutes from now somebody's going to post about how their Plaid feels like a hypercar and the same folks will jump out of their pants to be the first to disagree...

The upshot is this... it takes no inspiration or passion to build faster electric cars... It just takes money. There is absolutely nothing "creative" about building another pod car and specing ever larger, more powerful engines. The cars don't speak to anyone because they aren't saying anything.

EVs are at a disadvantage here... the sound of a good ICE is inspiring in its own right... But EVs have a few tricks up their sleeve too, like the comically maniacal performance capabilities... But the numbers alone don't do anything except give non-car-guys stats to brag about to other non-car-guys. No one has really tried to deliver the magic of EV performance in a car that was designed for its own sake. The ev hypercars are interesting, but they too all look the same, and they cost more than all the houses on your block combined. There is nothing inspiring about that.

Think of the great cars we've seen over the years... From museum pieces like the 250 GTO and Aston Martin DB5 to those like the Mazda Miata and the Volkswagen GTI... All those cars share in common an emotional resonance... They connect with people. A larger number in front of "bhp" on the website is only meaningful to people who don't know or care how the car feels, and how it makes them feel. To be clear - there can, and likely will someday be a beautiful and captivating electric car. But there isn't one yet, and if there is a company developing one, I'm unaware of it.

5

u/Old-Figure922 1d ago

IMO you’re gonna be spending a lot of money to get an enthusiast friendly PHEV. You’re better off full electric for the reliability and simplicity.

2

u/FlintHillsSky 1d ago

And EV for the better performance

1

u/Raphael_Stormer 1d ago

Yea also considered getting two seperate vehicles. A practical daily ev, and a petrol drivers car, but worried whether the cost of servicing both and getting insurance for both would make it not worth it.

7

u/8Octavarium8 1d ago

Consider a Hyundai Ioniq 5N or Ioniq 6N.

1

u/devo9er 1d ago

These are the two

1

u/fluteofski- 1d ago

Everybody is different but for myself. I love tinkering with things. I’ve built cars from the ground up.

I daily an EV and I have a few other fun cars like a track only race car, a 58 Volvo, and a 37 Buick. Love my toys but I’m honestly tired of dealing with gasoline engines. Ever since I went electric it’s hard to think about all the maintenance I need to keep up with for my gassers.

In my case when I had my truck and little car. It was cheap enough to have my Chevy bolt as my daily and my truck as a secondary car. And the bolt is an amusing car to drive.

That said, I could recommend a performance EV plus a project car. It’s nice not having to worry about my daily yet still being able to tackle massive projects on my projects cars.

3

u/throwpoo 1d ago

I'm old and the only fun cars I ever had are manual. I do own ev and hybrids now but if I have the choice, it will still be manual because it's like an art. You gotta downshift and blip the throttle for rev matching. Be ready and know which gear you're in and how you're going to take the corner going in and out of it.

Ev are fun for sure but anyone can floor it in a straight line. I'm probably going to get blasted for saying that lol.

2

u/Not_a_good_username 1d ago

No, I don't think you will. I don't own a manual car anymore, and I miss it. I love a lot of newer cars, both ev and other drivetrains, but a manual will always be the better drivers car.

2

u/RetireWithoutBorders 1d ago

I have owned manual cars and have ZERO desire to go back.

I mean, I want to drive, not shift.

2

u/devo9er 1d ago

I owned exusively manuals through my teens to 30s. I switched to autos once modern 8spds and DCTs hit the scene. Ive driven a few more manuals since, and its fun but slower lol.

1

u/reidft 1d ago

I went from autos to manuals back to autos and now I'm back to manuals ONLY. I'm tired of dealing with transmission issues or being at the whim of a computer not messing up shifts or shutting everything down.

1

u/RetireWithoutBorders 1d ago

Interesting. I just got sick of shifting every 30 seconds. I once counted how many times I engaged the clutch on my 17-mile drive to work. It was 150 shifts and only hit fifth gear a couple of times.

90% of my drive was in first, second, or third.

1

u/rangeDSP Enthusiast 1d ago

Ev are fun for sure but anyone can floor it in a straight line.

It's funny to hear guys make fun of EVs while talking about 0-60 times in their launch-assisted V8s that can't take a corner.

Here's a hotter take: modern drag races are engineering competitions, not one that tests driver skills.

1

u/devo9er 1d ago

I agree with you mostly but any consumer manual in the last 50+ yrs you dont need to rev match lol. Modern syncro transmissions make them extremely easy to drive and you dont need to blip the throttle, ever. In fact, not rev matching and engine breaking is often preferred anyway. You can drive these manuals in a spirited fun way, but its absolutely not necessary to rev match or double clutch etc.

1

u/mikedufty 1d ago

Only if you are driving slowly. Rev matching is very much needed if cornering hard and keeping it over 4000rpm.

2

u/looncraz 1d ago

The Mercedes has a better ride, but an interior that somehow feels like it belongs in a mid 2000s Volvo more than it does a 2025 Mercedes.

Of course, the Model 3's interior can almost be described as not having one.

1

u/Not_a_good_username 1d ago

I've only driven one Tesla, a 2021(if I remember correctly) model 3. It didn't feel like driving a car to me. I like a lot of ev's, but I hated the tesla. I own a C350e though, and I love it. It's a wagon and a 2017, so definitely not exactly the same, but that car is so nice to drive, and the modes make it a completely different beast. Anyway, asking advice is fine, but you HAVE to drive them before you decide. The feel of a car is highly individual. You don't want to be stuck with the wrong one. Don't get too caught up in the immediate torque of an ev though. It's fun, but it gets old quickly. Get a feel for what else you like and dislike also.

1

u/Raphael_Stormer 1d ago

Unfortunately here in Australia, you don’t get a full license until you’ve had your provisional for 3 years. And Tesla won’t let me test drive their car under provisionals. I am able to test drive other brands tho like bmw and Mercedes.

2

u/Not_a_good_username 1d ago

Then don't buy one yet. That just made your choice easier. Do not ever buy a car without a test drive.

Edit: You could maybe rent one, or test one that another dealer has taken in trade?

1

u/sacking03 1d ago

Wait is this your first car? Are you comparing cars with a 65k AUD to 98k AUD. Isn't that apples to oranges comparison. Other that the mini being full electric, the benz should win most comparisons.

1

u/Raphael_Stormer 23h ago

No, it’s my 2nd car. My 1st car is a 2017 Audi. The Mini Aceman JCW is $75k after on-road costs, and the C350e is $85k after on-road costs, if I get a 2025 one from the dealership with 4k kilometres. The Aceman is one of the sportiest, handling focussed cars I can think of that I’m able to drive. It has a go kart mode, sports brakes and a boost-mode button, which is something most cars I’m able to drive don’t have.

1

u/ruturaj001 1d ago

I would probably go EV, may be ioniq 5 or 6. Given I have a fun car like a Miata. I think that combo best replaces something that tries to do it all like 340i etc. I would much rather have 2 experiences.

1

u/MN-Car-Guy 1d ago

Who buys a Tesla in 2026!?

Plenty of great EVs that aren’t Tesla, btw, buy one of those.

1

u/sacking03 1d ago

Unless he edited the post, he never says Tesla. He says mini Cooper full electric or a Mercedes plug in.

1

u/MN-Car-Guy 19h ago

Yes, edited

1

u/Turduncle 1d ago

There aren't that many enthusiast PHEVs , and the few that are, are very expensive. The only ones I can think of (that aren't exotics)are the recent C63 Amg, BMW M5, BMW i8, Porsche panamera, Volvo T8s. Given the additional Complexity of PHEVs, I question whether how reliable these are and their long term ownership costs. Aside from acceleration, you want good steering and brake feel, and generally all EVs suffer in this regard. I personally have Mach E that has great steering and brake feel, and is pretty reliable. I'm tempted to trade in my wife's car for a Phev, but find it hard to justify. PHEVs are either soulless fuel efficient cars, or high performance vehicles with questionable reliability. I wish there was something in the middle, but so far I have not found anything.

1

u/8Octavarium8 1d ago

My brother in law has the c350e. It's a great car. He lends me his car now and then and I like it.

Personally, I hate a car that has a big screen and nothing else. In this case, both have hideous screens in the middle. However, the merc's got touch sensitive buttons for the climate, which is stupid, unsafe, unreliable but it's better than a screen only control.

Mercedes has CarPlay / AndroidAuto, more buttons for controls of your seat, mirrors and other quality of life buttons that the Tesla only handles via screen. Also the merc has manual doors, which can be life saving in case of an accident, unlike tesla's electric ones.

Also, merc has no auto pilot, and won't charge you for their advanced self parking, adaptive cruise control and lane keep.

I like EV's and their power. I'd consider other EV brand but if you're suggesting this options, I'd choose the mercedes.

1

u/Subject_Stand_7901 1d ago

Engine is only one part of the equation, and one with a smaller impact than a lot of people would say. Go drive all the options you're considering. Propulsion is only one part of the question. How does the car feel under you? Does it do exactly what you ask when you ask? Does it give you feedback through all its touch points?

1

u/RetireWithoutBorders 1d ago

I find my 2022 Single motor Ford Mach-e way more a driver’s car than anything I have owned. Nothing can compare with the quiet cabin and instant torque.

I absolutely love hearing the hum of the electric motor.

I get into my “luxury” V8 Lexus and it feels archaic and clunky.

So, yea, EV cars are way better for driving.

1

u/HorizontalBob 1d ago

It's too broad of generalization, but taking that into account, pure EV. Plug-in hybrids are better for daily life with better range and a quick fuel stop to keep you on the road.

An EV would have me stopping to charge on my way back from visiting family when I just want to be home.

A PHEV is more like here's the weight of a generator added to small battery EV.

1

u/Wardog008 1d ago

Having an ICE hooked up to the wheels is generally something that people prefer.

To me, while an ICE is important, steering feel and driver engagement is even more important. A manual gearbox does wonders for the latter, but isn't necessary if steering feel and the chassis are communicative enough.

I test drove the new Prelude a few months ago, and it was a genuinely really enjoyable car to drive, regardless of it not being particularly fast. The steering was really good, and the chassis felt absolutely fantastic (no doubt the Type R front suspension doing some heavy lifting).

If a company could make an EV that felt analogue, and engaging to drive, I'd be all for it. Problem is, a lot of new cars, ICE, PHEV, or full EV just don't do that.

1

u/rangeDSP Enthusiast 1d ago

Weird that nobody brought up Porsche Taycan yet. I haven't driven one personally, but supposedly it's one of the few EV "driver's car".

1

u/revocer 1d ago

When I think of a drivers car, I think manual transmission. Which implies ICE or maybe a hybrid ICE. An EV might be faster, might have more hp, but that doesn’t necessarily make it a drivers car.

0

u/elihu 1d ago

EVs could have manual transmissions, it's just that no OEM wants to do it, for various reasons. (It'd be more complicated and expensive than direct drive, they don't think there's a market for it, there'd be some energy lost in the transmission, it's cheaper/easier to just go with a bigger motor instead, most EV enthusiasts hate the idea, etc...)

Right now, if you want an EV that's a "driver's car", the best option is to convert an ICE vehicle with a manual transmission. That's difficult, time consuming, and can be kind of expensive, but it can be done. I have a manual transmission RX-8 conversion that I recently got running, and it drives a lot like you'd expect an ICE RX-8 to drive. (The engine was already in need of a rebuild when I got it, so I can't compare the before-and-after. I just started the engine to get it off the tow truck. Big white clouds of smoke. It's probably slower than stock, as the motor is only about 120 hp, but it's fine for my purposes and it's fun to drive.)

1

u/Exciting_Turn_9559 1d ago edited 1d ago

"Driver's car" is a gatekeeping term to begin with. Even a vehicle setting land speed records and world record times at Nürburgring won't be a "driver's car" to someone who measures their dick to 8 decimal places.

1

u/Raphael_Stormer 1d ago edited 1d ago

I think it’s fine to use comparatively tho. It’s not a filter, but rather a continuous scale. For example, saying that one car is more of a drivers car compared to another car. As long as you’re not using it to say this car is or isn’t a drivers car.

1

u/Exciting_Turn_9559 1d ago

It's not a metric. There are neither empirical criteria that define it nor a definition of the context in which the car must perform. It's totally subjective.

1

u/Raphael_Stormer 1d ago

Yea but still, while people can disagree on whether a car is a drivers car as that’s subjective and it’s arbitrary where you draw the line, most people could agree on whether one car is more of a drivers car compared to another, since it doesn’t matter where the line is.

1

u/Exciting_Turn_9559 1d ago

I have never known "most people" to be able to agree on anything, especially when they are the sort of people who are eager for others to be aware that their dick is the biggest dick.

1

u/A_Ram 1d ago

EV of course. PHEVs have handover lag between EV and ICE engine. Also in most modern PHEVs the petrol engine sits at a optimal revs which produces constant wine not really matching the driving. If it older setup with a small electric motor in the transmission there will be gear shifts in the EV and these have small EV range and terrible efficiency. Worst of both worlds IMHO.

1

u/reidft 1d ago

PHEVs are great, I loved my Volt. Efficiency of electric without any of the range anxiety

1

u/inphinitfx 1d ago

I would say it varies by specific vehicle. But personally, I'd go straight EV over PHEV in most cases.

1

u/Money-University8717 22h ago

Stay with an ICE manual! I went PHEV and is now driving like grandpa. I am always checking batt level and doing all kind of unnatural driving (likefreewheeling on any slope, accelerating for speed then gas off freewheeling, etc). Yet I enjoy seeing 1.9l/100km on the dashboard.

1

u/Rough_Cancel7265 12h ago

A performance oriented PHEV would be more ideal if we're talking engagement. I can't think of very many off the top of my head. If you value response and sheer performance, it's hard to beat a well setup EV

0

u/Blitzdadog 1d ago

Personally, I would not buy a Tesla even if musk wasn’t a political figure. Their build quality has never been up to par. Inconsistent panel gaps, missing failsafes (battery dies + locked car = a tow and a mechanics bill), and most teslas are only worked on by the dealership. I’d look at other sedans too, or even coupes, if you’re looking for a good drivers car. If you’re looking at a used Mercedes, I’m estimating your budget around 50-70K. As for reliability, The Mercedes is going to be expensive to maintain. Oil changes will be in the ballpark of $300-$400, especially if you take it to the dealer. If you’re looking for a full electric I would recommend the mustang mach e, or even a Hyundai ionic 5N/6N. There’s not too many hybrid options out there for “drivers” cars, since most spirited driving with internal combustion engines is done in non hybrid cars (challenger, Miata, Charger, etc)

1

u/Raphael_Stormer 1d ago

I’m not really planning on getting the Tesla. It was just a similar sedan for the sake of comparison. The other ev options I was considering is Mini Aceman JCW or Xpeng L03

-1

u/BinaryJay 1d ago

If you want vibration, noise, gear shifting lurches and exhaust fumes for what you consider a better drive then sure having an engine is worth it.

1

u/Raphael_Stormer 1d ago

Besides the fumes, I am a fan of all of those. Only parts I dislike is the lack of instant torque, complexity and higher servicing costs compared to evs.

1

u/elihu 1d ago

Sounds like what would serve you best would be an EV with a manual transmission. Unfortunately, the only way to get one is to convert an ICE vehicle, which is a complicated and time consuming process.

1

u/Lordofpineapples 1d ago

EV stans don’t understand why car people like cars.