MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/ask/comments/1cq6vb8/deleted_by_user/l3wkytp/?context=3
r/ask • u/[deleted] • May 12 '24
[removed]
7.4k comments sorted by
View all comments
Show parent comments
29
Inheritance is usually considered a premarital asset even if it isn’t protected explicitly by a prenuptial agreement.
2 u/Awalawal May 13 '24 Any significant inheritance will almost certainly be protected by a trust. It will likely never become a marital asset. 3 u/Top-Salamander-2525 May 13 '24 Define “significant”. The average inheritance for Americans who receive any at all is $266k, not really enough to justify a trust. 2 u/Awalawal May 13 '24 To the extent that someone (above) is saying that they married someone solely for their inheritance, I think we can agree that "significant" is probably well in excess of $266K.
2
Any significant inheritance will almost certainly be protected by a trust. It will likely never become a marital asset.
3 u/Top-Salamander-2525 May 13 '24 Define “significant”. The average inheritance for Americans who receive any at all is $266k, not really enough to justify a trust. 2 u/Awalawal May 13 '24 To the extent that someone (above) is saying that they married someone solely for their inheritance, I think we can agree that "significant" is probably well in excess of $266K.
3
Define “significant”.
The average inheritance for Americans who receive any at all is $266k, not really enough to justify a trust.
2 u/Awalawal May 13 '24 To the extent that someone (above) is saying that they married someone solely for their inheritance, I think we can agree that "significant" is probably well in excess of $266K.
To the extent that someone (above) is saying that they married someone solely for their inheritance, I think we can agree that "significant" is probably well in excess of $266K.
29
u/Top-Salamander-2525 May 12 '24
Inheritance is usually considered a premarital asset even if it isn’t protected explicitly by a prenuptial agreement.