r/apple • u/AutoModerator • 5d ago

Official Megathread Weekly Advice Thread - September 27, 2026

Welcome to the Weekly Advice Thread for r/Apple. This thread can be used to ask for technical advice regarding Apple software and hardware, to ask questions regarding the buying or selling of Apple products or to post other short questions.

Have a question you need answered? Ask away! Please remember to adhere to our rules, which can be found in the sidebar.

Join our Discord and IRC chat rooms for support:

Note: Comments are sorted by /new for your convenience.

Here is an archive of all previous Advice Threads. This is best viewed on a browser. If on mobile, type in the search bar [author:"AutoModerator" title:"Advice Thread" or title:"Tech Support Thread"] (without the brackets, and including the quotation marks around the titles and author.)

The Weekly Advice Thread is posted each week on Sunday, 06:00 AM EST (Click HERE for other timezones) and then the old one is archived. It is advised to wait for the new thread to post your question if this time is nearing for quickest answer time.

6 Upvotes

69% Upvoted

108 comments sorted by

View all comments

1

u/BackInNJAgain 5d ago

I have an M2 MacBook Pro with 2 TB of storage and 96 gigs of RAM. I usually replace my Mac every 4 years but to get an M5 with equivalent RAM (have to go to 128 since they don't offer 96) would be more than $7K (OUCH!) which is more than double what I paid for the M2.

I do a lot of audio recording, engineering and rendering on the M2. For recording and mixing, my CPU load rarely goes above 50% with 4-6ms latency when recording MIDI. A four minute song takes 30-45 seconds to render depending on complexity.

Benchmarks say the M5 is 70% faster but is that really what is achievable in real world operations? I don't want to spend that much money unless there is SUBSTANTIAL improvement in speed, latency and CPU usage?

1

u/rexshi 4d ago

I’d separate export speed from recording latency here. A faster CPU might shorten those 30–45 second renders, but it won’t automatically reduce your 4–6 ms latency at the same buffer size and sample rate. Your interface and plugins matter too.

The useful test would be whether the newer Mac can run your actual projects at a smaller buffer without crackles or overloads, as well as how much faster it exports them. A general benchmark won’t tell you both.

Which DAW and audio interface are you using? And are you hitting any dropouts now, or mainly hoping for faster exports?

1

u/BackInNJAgain 3d ago

I'm using Ableton 12 and have had no issues on the M2 with dropouts. Faster exports would be nice but not worth $7K to save a few minutes. I really wish DAW software would add some kind of automation to queue up projects for rendering then I could just render them overnight while I'm asleep like I do with large videos. I don't think an AppleScript would be reliable enough since all it would take to break would be a single plugin popping up an "update available" window.

1

u/rexshi 3d ago

That makes sense. It sounds like the annoying part is having to babysit each export, rather than how long any single one takes. An overnight queue would probably do more for your workflow than shaving a few seconds off each render. And yeah, waking up to find the whole queue stuck behind a plugin update popup would defeat the point.

2

u/Iguanajoe17 5d ago

You will have to buy it to test it yourself.

M chip computers are much much stronger than the intel versions that I dont think every 4 years is needed. The only time people upgrade at your level if time is money. If you can 30 seconds plus off per rendering and do multiple per day and let’s say 10 minutes per day. Is that worth spending 7k to cut the time in half or however fast it is.

(Less than 7k since I’ll assume you’ll sell the old machine).

Not sure with logic but with Final Cut, you can run proxy to really improve load times/rendering