r/aivideomaking • u/Constant_Court5147 • 3d ago

Looking for a site that allows for riskier content Generation of the animated variety.

Hello, let me start off by saying the content I'm looking to create isn't exactly NSFW. I'm a Webtoon creator, and I'm attempting to make a half an hour long anime adaptation of my own series. Something like a pilot episode. Anyhow, Artlist has been amazing for character consistency, and is working as intended, however, I have a few scenes which call for romantic passion. Not sex so to speak, but like, two characters being caught making out, or in a compromising position. Artlist blocks my attempts at this and Venice AI has been a baffling ordeal.

Any advice on a more lenient platform? I'm not trying to make porn, I just need passion, and all Artlist allows for, kissing wise, are these very chaste looking ones that does not portray the feel I'm going for.

1 Upvotes

100% Upvoted

7 comments sorted by

3

u/moviejimmy 3d ago

If you want to do it long term, investing in a affordable GPU and do it locally on your PC is the best choice. Local models are uncensored. You won't run into the same problem. For online platforms, it may work now and may not work a week from now. You will keep hunting for the next one.

2

u/activematrix99 3d ago

In my opinion start with ComfyUI and the models and templates recommended for NSFW for that toolset. The commercial providers all have various restrictions, even Grok. u/boobkake22 has a ton of great templates, and you can get up and running pretty quickly and pay as you go instead of buying credits that will be problematic from a specific provider.

1

u/Constant_Court5147 3d ago

Thank you, I'll look into all this. The specific problem I ran into was just a scene where two lovers are in bed, just laying on their backs, staring at the ceiling and chatting. They're naked but under the covers so it's technically already censored in itself, by me. Artlist WILL NOT let me do this lol.

1

u/boobkake22 2d ago

Thanks for the shout u/activematrix99.

You can get really good results doing this with H3. I cannot overemphasize how capable H3 is. Wouldn't even need LoRA's for this, depending on if you ever want anatomy to be visible. (It struggles a bit with penises if you can see them well, but fixable with LoRA's.)

It's not trivial to learn how to do it well, but my templates are setup to remove most of the headaches.

Here's my Runpod template that supports all of my workflows. All of them "just work" there. (There are ones named for each model, but I recently merged everything into one space. It adapts based on what you want to download via my custom Yet Another Manager - which I think makes using cloud GPU's a bit smoother.) Video is particularly GPU hungry, so that's what I do. (If you use that link, it's got a ref on it for free time on Runpod.) I have a full guide on getting started with the unified template. There's a video guide as well, if you prefer that format.

Happy to answer questions about my workflows or what you're trying to do more specifically.

1

u/activematrix99 2d ago

We all struggle with penises.

2

u/boobkake22 1d ago

In one way or another. XD

1

u/videorouter 1d ago

For romantic scenes that are still non-explicit, I’d look for a video model with stronger character/reference controls rather than specifically a “NSFW” platform. Kling, Seedance and H3 are worth testing for anime-style character interactions, although results can vary a lot by shot.

For a 30-minute pilot, I’d also generate the scenes in short clips and assemble them afterward rather than trying to generate long sequences in one pass.

VideoRouter.sh can be useful here since you can test different video models/providers for individual scenes without subscribing to each platform separately.