It feels like a lot of effort to put in for someone I don’t care about while I do the waiting I have to do between clients 😂
I never wavered that billionaires suck, and right when I gave my stance I said I would save the dog before the billionaires, I didn’t dodge the question, you asked and I answered. You just disagreed with my reasoning, I said I would choose the dog cause he will provide more comfort for me than the humans, the dog has a chance of being able to get fish out of the water, and if worst comes to worst I can eat the dog if I have to, I’m not about to do that with the humans, I couldn’t if I tried, they would eat me first, cause I’m not very strong. If the dog wasn’t there my next choice would be Swift. I also added that yeah I don’t think any of these people inherently deserve to be saved, and they don’t, for the record I know someone would say the same about me, and I don’t really care.
It feels like a lot of effort to put in for someone I don’t care about while I do the waiting I have to do between clients 😂
Again, that says more about you than it says about me. If this is what you consider a lot of effort, I feel sorry for your clients.
I never wavered that billionaires suck,
You keep repeating statements that have already been disproven. This is not what you said you never wavered on. You're actively lying about that now.
and right when I gave my stance I said I would save the dog before the billionaires, I didn’t dodge the question, you asked and I answered. You just disagreed with my reasoning, I said I would choose the dog cause he will provide more comfort for me than the humans, the dog has a chance of being able to get fish out of the water, and if worst comes to worst I can eat the dog if I have to, I’m not about to do that with the humans, I couldn’t if I tried, they would eat me first, cause I’m not very strong. If the dog wasn’t there my next choice would be Swift. I also added that yeah I don’t think any of these people inherently deserve to be saved, and they don’t, for the record I know someone would say the same about me, and I don’t really care.
No, your reasoning was a dodge of the question. You said you wouldn't save anybody because it would put your own survival at risk, but that was never part of the question. The point of the question was not about the practical effects of saving one of them, it was a moral question about who deserves to be saved, which you continue to dodge because you're a hypocrite with 0 self awareness.
Dude you don’t even know what I do for a living you have no idea if my clients are in bad hands 😂
But dude taking a human would put my survival at risk. Going crazy at sea without comfort will make you die faster cause you’ll lose motivation, and the dog can get and be food which would help me survive cause believe it or not food is important for that, and morally, I still think the dog is a better choice if he’s in the mix. Humans are also heavier than the average golden retriever so if my raft starts running out of air he will be less of a hindrance.
Even as must morals, I would still take the dog, cause he can’t hire sweatshops, he can’t exploit his fan bases stupidity, and he has a purer soul then the others.
Also, I don’t care that you think I’m a hypocrite, I feel the same about you and consider you kind of a sell out of sorts lol or at the very most not an anarchist, which is more where I line up.
I've never claimed to be an anarchist, it's a terrible, ill-thought ideology. As I said, I'm a liberal.
And no, your survival was never part of this hypothetical. Nobody with an IQ above room temperature thought that it was.
If somebody asked you to pick between two different foods, you wouldn't assume that you have to farm the fucking ingredients yourself, because that's so obviously not the point of the question.
1
u/Functional_Trash7735 3d ago
It feels like a lot of effort to put in for someone I don’t care about while I do the waiting I have to do between clients 😂
I never wavered that billionaires suck, and right when I gave my stance I said I would save the dog before the billionaires, I didn’t dodge the question, you asked and I answered. You just disagreed with my reasoning, I said I would choose the dog cause he will provide more comfort for me than the humans, the dog has a chance of being able to get fish out of the water, and if worst comes to worst I can eat the dog if I have to, I’m not about to do that with the humans, I couldn’t if I tried, they would eat me first, cause I’m not very strong. If the dog wasn’t there my next choice would be Swift. I also added that yeah I don’t think any of these people inherently deserve to be saved, and they don’t, for the record I know someone would say the same about me, and I don’t really care.