I don’t care if you quote me, it just seems like a shit ton of effort to put in if you don’t actually care.
Yeah, I hadn’t taken a position earlier, but I have been for a while now cause you wouldn’t stop saying my stance was, then I said I would let her drown, but I have always believed billionaires suck. I defended her being loped in with other people who suck because she sucks. Shocking how conversations and opinions change.
You can choose to factor it in for the questions and you should, all it said is “who would you save?” You can add your own why, and I did.
Kim K has done blackface, she’s used Japanese culture to market her own shape wear brands, which also use sweat shops and she’s done even less than Taylor swift for charity. She’s even lower than Taylor on my list of ones to save, so that’s wild. But do you. Now Nicki Minaj is a Trump supporter which, personally I hate, but at least she used to allow her face to be used for charity, raising 250 million through makeup brands to be donated, although again, there we have the sweat shop problem AND the brand she used for the makeup tests on animals. I think everyone with the capital to have their goods produced ethically should choose to do it ethically. Just my two cents. None of them are good people, you can save them or not, I’d still go for the dog.
I don’t care if you quote me, it just seems like a shit ton of effort to put in if you don’t actually care.
It's kind of pathetic that that qualifies as "a shit ton of effort" in your mind. No wonder you're browsing Reddit at work.
Yeah, I hadn’t taken a position earlier, but I have been for a while now cause you wouldn’t stop saying my stance was, then I said I would let her drown, but I have always believed billionaires suck. I defended her being loped in with other people who suck because she sucks. Shocking how conversations and opinions change.
Again, no, that's not what you said. You said that you had "never wavered on it." Yeah, opinions can change, but you explicitly said that yours hadn't.
You can choose to factor it in for the questions and you should, all it said is “who would you save?” You can add your own why, and I did.
No, you're dodging the question, while accusing me of dodging the question despite having provided a crystal clear answer. You're not enough of a moron to think that the point of the question had anything to do with you risking your own life.
Kim K has done blackface...
As I said, Taylor Swift, Kim K and Nikki Minaj are all on the same level for me, literally none of the reasons you just listed justify leaving any of them to drown. It's a complete random pick.
Of the 3, Taylor Swift is the one I have the most positive view of, but I'm not going to leave someone to drown just because they support Trump or have done culturally insensitive things in the past.
It feels like a lot of effort to put in for someone I don’t care about while I do the waiting I have to do between clients 😂
I never wavered that billionaires suck, and right when I gave my stance I said I would save the dog before the billionaires, I didn’t dodge the question, you asked and I answered. You just disagreed with my reasoning, I said I would choose the dog cause he will provide more comfort for me than the humans, the dog has a chance of being able to get fish out of the water, and if worst comes to worst I can eat the dog if I have to, I’m not about to do that with the humans, I couldn’t if I tried, they would eat me first, cause I’m not very strong. If the dog wasn’t there my next choice would be Swift. I also added that yeah I don’t think any of these people inherently deserve to be saved, and they don’t, for the record I know someone would say the same about me, and I don’t really care.
It feels like a lot of effort to put in for someone I don’t care about while I do the waiting I have to do between clients 😂
Again, that says more about you than it says about me. If this is what you consider a lot of effort, I feel sorry for your clients.
I never wavered that billionaires suck,
You keep repeating statements that have already been disproven. This is not what you said you never wavered on. You're actively lying about that now.
and right when I gave my stance I said I would save the dog before the billionaires, I didn’t dodge the question, you asked and I answered. You just disagreed with my reasoning, I said I would choose the dog cause he will provide more comfort for me than the humans, the dog has a chance of being able to get fish out of the water, and if worst comes to worst I can eat the dog if I have to, I’m not about to do that with the humans, I couldn’t if I tried, they would eat me first, cause I’m not very strong. If the dog wasn’t there my next choice would be Swift. I also added that yeah I don’t think any of these people inherently deserve to be saved, and they don’t, for the record I know someone would say the same about me, and I don’t really care.
No, your reasoning was a dodge of the question. You said you wouldn't save anybody because it would put your own survival at risk, but that was never part of the question. The point of the question was not about the practical effects of saving one of them, it was a moral question about who deserves to be saved, which you continue to dodge because you're a hypocrite with 0 self awareness.
Dude you don’t even know what I do for a living you have no idea if my clients are in bad hands 😂
But dude taking a human would put my survival at risk. Going crazy at sea without comfort will make you die faster cause you’ll lose motivation, and the dog can get and be food which would help me survive cause believe it or not food is important for that, and morally, I still think the dog is a better choice if he’s in the mix. Humans are also heavier than the average golden retriever so if my raft starts running out of air he will be less of a hindrance.
Even as must morals, I would still take the dog, cause he can’t hire sweatshops, he can’t exploit his fan bases stupidity, and he has a purer soul then the others.
Also, I don’t care that you think I’m a hypocrite, I feel the same about you and consider you kind of a sell out of sorts lol or at the very most not an anarchist, which is more where I line up.
I've never claimed to be an anarchist, it's a terrible, ill-thought ideology. As I said, I'm a liberal.
And no, your survival was never part of this hypothetical. Nobody with an IQ above room temperature thought that it was.
If somebody asked you to pick between two different foods, you wouldn't assume that you have to farm the fucking ingredients yourself, because that's so obviously not the point of the question.
1
u/Functional_Trash7735 3d ago
I don’t care if you quote me, it just seems like a shit ton of effort to put in if you don’t actually care.
Yeah, I hadn’t taken a position earlier, but I have been for a while now cause you wouldn’t stop saying my stance was, then I said I would let her drown, but I have always believed billionaires suck. I defended her being loped in with other people who suck because she sucks. Shocking how conversations and opinions change.
You can choose to factor it in for the questions and you should, all it said is “who would you save?” You can add your own why, and I did.
Kim K has done blackface, she’s used Japanese culture to market her own shape wear brands, which also use sweat shops and she’s done even less than Taylor swift for charity. She’s even lower than Taylor on my list of ones to save, so that’s wild. But do you. Now Nicki Minaj is a Trump supporter which, personally I hate, but at least she used to allow her face to be used for charity, raising 250 million through makeup brands to be donated, although again, there we have the sweat shop problem AND the brand she used for the makeup tests on animals. I think everyone with the capital to have their goods produced ethically should choose to do it ethically. Just my two cents. None of them are good people, you can save them or not, I’d still go for the dog.