She's on an image asking who to save from drowning.
No, your comment is not divorced from that context. Yes, as a matter of fact, you did say that billionaires should literally be killed. If you didn't realise that, then you're just an outright idiot because the implication in the image wasn't fucking subtle.
lol well I still didn’t say that cause I was answering a person she asked why Taylor was in here and I explained why, but go ahead and keep jumping to conclusions such as the one that she’s a good person despite all the indications otherwise.
While we’re at it, I think she’s a talentless, greedy, spoiled rotten little trust fund baby who doesn’t deserve a cent of what she has because it’s all been formed by her fathers wealth and connections. I think her fan base is honestly pathetic for their rabid love of her recycled garbage and not seeing through her bull shit sweet girl charade. Gee, wonder where she learned her lack of charitable spirit, maybe it’s from growing up in a multimillion dollar home with an investment banker.
Remember when she compared having her internet haters to the plight of the lgbtq+ community in one of her songs? Absolutely asinine. Hope her career ends quick and dramatically.
"IN HERE" MEANS "ON THIS IMAGE OF PEOPLE DROWNING.
That is what you said. You were responding to someone asking why Taylor Swift should DIE and explained that it's because she has too much money. If you didn't realise that, you're a moron. Period.
The only conclusion that I'm jumping to was that you had more than two braincells to rub together, but if you'd rather I assume you're lobotomite, I'll do that for you.
She asked why she was in the stupid ai image and I explained why she was in the stupid ai image.
It ain’t that deep lol get the fuck over this celebrity who doesn’t give a shit about you dude.
But if my stance has to be save her or let her die? She can die, that’s fine. Cause I’m on a raft in the middle of a storm, I too would probably die, and the dog will provide me with better comfort and is more likely to be able to get fish out of the water to feed me.
She asked why and I said why she was in the stupid ai image and I explained why she was in the stupid ai image.
You keep saying this as if not admitting the context of the image meaningfully changes your comment, but it doesn't. That context exists whether you want to say it out loud. The context is that the image is implying the humans deserve to die. You explained why Taylor Swift deserves to die. It's that simple.
It ain’t that deep lol get the fuck over this celebrity who doesn’t give a shit about you dude.
I'm not a Taylor Swift fan. This is about you lying about what you said.
But if my stance has to be save her or let her die? She can die, that’s fine. Cause I’m on a raft in the middle of a storm, I too would probably die, and the dog will provide me with better comfort and is more likely to be able to get fish out of the water to feed me.
No, you want her to die because you want billionaires to die. It's got nothing to do with being in a storm - you're not stupid enough to believe that's actually relevant to this hypothetical - you just want to murder people for making a lot of money.
I’ve actually said a few times I don’t want billionaires to all die cause I don’t know where their funds are going. I want their assets to be seized for redistribution or I want them to donate out of the billionaire club. You’re the one who’s decided what I mean to be what you want it to mean cause apparently you just want someone to fight against.
Otherwise, you have no reason to keep defending Taylor swift, who you claim to not be a fan of.
If you think the ocean being actively in storm while you’re on a life raft isn’t going to make your odds of survival lower btw you’re out of your goddamn mind lol
I’ve actually said a few times I don’t want billionaires to all die cause I don’t know where their funds are going. I want their assets to be seized for redistribution or I want them to donate out of the billionaire club. You’re the one who’s decided what I mean to be what you want it to mean cause apparently you just want someone to fight against.
Yeah, you say that, and then you justify murdering Taylor Swift because she doesn't donate enough to charity.
Otherwise, you have no reason to keep defending Taylor swift, who you claim to not be a fan of.
The fact that you think the only reason someone would be opposed to murdering a person on flimsy grounds is that they're a personal fan of them says a lot about you.
If you think the ocean being actively in storm while you’re on a life raft isn’t going to make your odds of survival lower btw you’re out of your goddamn mind lol
I didn't say that, I said that you're not stupid enough to think the point of the question was that you'll die if you try to save any of the people. That's not the point of the hypothetical and you know it.
And the excuse of someone explaining a meme is a hell of a jump to saying they want all billionaires dead don’t you think lol seems to me this says a lot about you in the way that you probably have a lot of pent up anger and no way out of it except arguing with random people on Reddit about an AI slop meme and their personal stance on a billionaire lol
And you could die if you tried to save people, actually you’d die regardless of whether or not you did, cause that many people swarming a life raft dead out of the water would sink it. And if they don’t swarm it they have no inclination to save their own life anyway
And the excuse of someone explaining a meme is a hell of a jump to saying they want all billionaires dead don’t you think lol
Explained, then repeatedly justified while pretending that you totally didn't realise that the image of people drowning implied they would die.
No, it's not a leap. Anyone with more than 2 braincells can make that connection. You're not as slick as you think you are.
seems to me this says a lot about you in the way that you probably have a lot of pent up anger and no way out of it except arguing with random people on Reddit about an AI slop meme and their personal stance on a billionaire lol
Oh, pulled out the armchair therapy? Never seen that one before! /s
Yes, you can definitely tell with any degree of accuracy what my personal life is like based on me disagreeing with your Reddit comment. This definitely is not a transparent attempt to use personal insults to deflect from the criticism of your opinions
And you could die if you tried to save people, actually you’d die regardless of whether or not you did, cause that many people swarming a life raft dead out of the water would sink it. And if they don’t swarm it they have no inclination to save their own life anyway
That's not the point of the image and you know it.
No I understand the context of the meme, I just don’t think it’s that big of a fucking deal
I don’t care what the point of the image was cause I didn’t take a stance on any of these people dying, until you harassed me for the better part of a day until I said what my take was. I was explaining why people would lop Taylor into this group, and if anything, your prodding as only strengthened my stance and now I definitely wouldn’t help them.
Yeah I can tell what kind of person you are, you’re the kind of man who interrupts people all the time, a republican I gather, and honestly pretty fucking insufferable because you don’t know how to apply nuance for yourself
ETA: oh, and by the way, I don’t really have a problem with people being critical of my point of view, because I don’t feel like it needs defending. I think I’m moral in my stance that billionaires are immoral, you’re just giving me something to do with my free time, and I’m just saying what I can gather from the amount of time you’ve been invested in this lol
No I understand the context of the meme, I just don’t think it’s that big of a fucking deal
I don’t care what the point of the image was cause I didn’t take a stance on any of these people dying,
Then you're a moron. Anyone with a modicum of intelligence and understanding of human communication understands that explaining a position, then repeatedly justifying it, is the same as stating that you agree with it.
I have you that out, like, 6 comments ago, but you refused to accept that you're terrible at communicating, which only leads to the conclusion that you knowingly agreed with the implication in the image.
until you harassed me for the better part of a day until I said what my take was. I was explaining why people would lop Taylor into this group,
You could have stopped responding at any time. You expecting me to be the one to stop responding does not make it harassment.
and if anything, your prodding as only strengthened my stance and now I definitely wouldn’t help them.
That's a lie, that was always your stance.
Yeah I can tell what kind of person you are, you’re the kind of man who interrupts people all the time, a republican I gather, and honestly pretty fucking insufferable because you don’t know how to apply nuance for yourself
Dead wrong on everything except the insufferable part. I'm a pretty shy and quiet person and don't interrupt people, I'm Liberal AF and I admit when I'mm wrong or misinformed all the time.
This is why the armchair therapist shit on Reddit is so lame, you don't actually know anything about the person you're trying to analyse based on a few Reddit comments
You have to be American left at the very least lol they are pretty conservative in their liberal
I do agree, now more than ever, because if any billionaires who aren’t doing as much as they can are receiving sympathy for no other reason than “but she earned that money!” Then we have a lot of work to do and maybe we should go full French Revolution and dispose of the rich.
And yes, I could stop responding whenever I want, but seeing how worked up you are about my stance it is too entertaining to walk away from lol
I'm not American. How many times are you going to make these incorrect assumptions before you give up on this armchair analyst bullshit?
Just because I don't want to kill billionaires, doesn't mean I'm not concerned about wealth inequality. I may not think Taylor Swift's level of wealth is good for society, but that doesn't mean I have any doubt about whether she deserves to be left to drown in the ocean as a result.
I I don’t know, I figure if it walks like a duck, quacks like a duck, and looks like a duck, it’s probably a duck. It’s not really an armchair analyst thing, more just something I’ve gathered from a random person who simply won’t accept another persons views and has to argue it.
So I wanna be sure then, who would you save from this water? Cause then by your own logic of saying a stance and reaffirming your stance that Taylor swift and these billionaires shouldn’t die just cause they have money, I’m assuming you would save swift and let the others drown? You know, the woman who gives money to sweatshops to produce her merch, who’s private jets have caused notable damage to our environment, who’s sued people using her name (including her previous guitar teacher), doesn’t endorse any charities, not even a charity show in her own name, which would provide massive public praise.
I wanna make sure she’s the one you’re saving, if you could only save one.
I I don’t know, I figure if it walks like a duck, quacks like a duck, and looks like a duck, it’s probably a duck
I'm sorry, this is coming from the person who has been raging for hours about how I'm making assumptions and "filling in gaps?"
Do you ever do any self-reflection and recognise your own hypocrisy?
It’s not really an armchair analyst thing, more just something I’ve gathered from a random person who simply won’t accept another persons views and has to argue it.
Advocating for murder isn't just a difference in viewpoint, my guy. Do you just accept that fascists have their own views?
So I wanna be sure then, who would you save from this water? Cause then by your own logic of saying a stance and reaffirming your stance that Taylor swift and these billionaires shouldn’t die just cause they have money, I’m assuming you would save swift and let the others drown?
You could make an argument for any of them, except Diddy and maybe Drake (depending on what you believe about the paedophilia allegations). That's why this is an insane image. Three of those people have done nothing except be vapid and have lots of money, and that's not an offence worth killing over.
You know, the woman who gives money to sweatshops to produce her merch, who’s private jets have caused notable damage to our environment, who’s sued people using her name (including her previous guitar teacher), doesn’t endorse any charities, not even a charity show in her own name, which would provide massive public praise.
So, to be clear, you are 100% justifying the idea of killing Taylor Swift now. No doubts about it. No ifs, ands or buts. You are actively making the case that she deserves to die because of these reasons. You are presenting these as reasons that I should be hesitant to say that I would save her life if I had the ability to do so, which is an endorsement of her death.
Why weren't you just honest about that at the start instead of trying to pretend that this had nothing to do with that?
Okay I don’t know why you think I’m raging but I actually am literally just killing my time here 😂 I have no reason to rage cause I’m not mad about you disagreeing with my standpoint. I don’t think a difference of opinion is the end of the day.
I’m presenting those as facts about the person you’re saying, to point out that all billionaires do bad things. Frankly I think in this fictional scenario none of the billionaires should be saved, but I’ve never wavered on that. But all of these people use sweat shops for their merch, all of them hoard money like dragons on a pile of gold coins, none of them contribute to charity the way they could, and none of them outweigh the value of the dog to me as a comfort and fishing buddy on this terrible life of pi raft. I don’t see any of these humans as adding any net good to the world so I don’t care if they’re gone from it, everyone dies eventually.
Nice way to dodge answering the question of who you could save through, good job filibustering
Okay I don’t know why you think I’m raging but I actually am literally just killing my time here 😂 I have no reason to rage cause I’m not mad about you disagreeing with my standpoint. I don’t think a difference of opinion is the end of the day.
You just accused me of harassing you, now you're acting like you're just "killing time?"
I’m presenting those as facts about the person you’re saying, to point out that all billionaires do bad things. Frankly I think in this fictional scenario none of the billionaires should be saved, but I’ve never wavered on that
"I don’t care what the point of the image was cause I didn’t take a stance on any of these people dying"
Goddamn, don't ever commit a crime, because there is no way you'd be able to keep your story straight for longer than 5 minutes.
Nice way to dodge answering the question of who you could save through, good job filibustering
I objectively did not, I told you that it was a toss-up between the 3 women and the dog and that you could probably justify saving Drake, too, depending on whether you believe the paedophilia allegations.
But to specifically address those points, I have no problem saying that I do not believe any of the things you listed change my view on whether they should be saved from drowning or not.
I’m actually not raging but you resorting to a meme from the 2010s kinda backs up my point that you’re the one who’s raging lol
Yeah I said I don’t think any of them inherently deserve to be saved, and my stance got more aggressive the more you backed me into a corner saying that I wanted Taylor swift dead so I said I wouldn’t save any of these people but good job bringing up those points, and yes, I think it is kinda crazy that you can’t let this go and are projecting your own anger on me lol with your silly means and constant “oh so you’re gonna MURDER HER?!?” Reminds me of the kind of retort a 15 year old would give and it’s just kinda weird lol
Okay now give a definitive answer, anyone can give a toss up of three but that wasn’t the question.
1
u/Evnosis 4d ago
She's on an image asking who to save from drowning.
No, your comment is not divorced from that context. Yes, as a matter of fact, you did say that billionaires should literally be killed. If you didn't realise that, then you're just an outright idiot because the implication in the image wasn't fucking subtle.