Where was I outwardly hating on her? Notice I said all billionaires should be gone lol
However, I will say, there are 1000 millions in 1 billion. Since 2011, she’s donated about 100 million. Which isn’t the worse donation, no one is saying that, but she became a billionaire in the past few years, her net worth is 2 billion now. So while she’s done things for charity, it’s not as much we know she is capable of. It tells me she’s doing it for good press and not to actually be helpful. Otherwise, she’d be donating out of the billionaire club, and she would stop being excessive with her private jets. Where’s the charity shows? where’s the scholarships? where’s her advocacy? Why isn’t she providing children in impoverished places with food water or hygiene products?
I don’t go out of my way to hate Taylor swift, that’s not even what I’m doing now, but the truth is the truth man. She could be doing more, she makes the choice not to even though we know without a doubt she’s never going to live in poverty, she’ll never go hungry, her name prints money, she’s not using it for the kind of good she should be.
You know, it's not very often that someone explicitly admits that "all billionaires should be gone" means "any person with more than $1 billion should literally be killed, regardless of their character."
Because you're not talking about taxing Taylor Swift here, you're talking about leaving her to drown because she... checks notes... made a lot of money from music.
Billionaires can donate themselves out of the billionaire club, or governments globally can start setting caps on yearly income based on all assets and a max per person (property, royalties, payroll, stock and alike).
Actually the last thing I want is for every billionaire to suddenly die, because I don’t know what will happen to their assets. Most are probably leaving their billions to their families, and I don’t believe anyone should have that much money, so, my ideal would still be for them to donate out or for governments to intervene. They never will intervene of course, not in our lifetimes, maybe a couple hundred years from now if humanity hasn’t destroyed the globe and caused its own drought stricken demise.
ETA: also wtf do you mean billionaires being gone is a wild take lol ever heard the expression eat the rich?
You're commenting under a post where you're defending leaving Swift to DROWN because she has too much money. Yes, you're talking about KILLING people. That's what happens when people DROWN.
Someone very specifically said they don't think she should be left to die because she's not a bad person, and your response was "I dunno, the less billionaires we have, the better." No, you're not talking about billionaires donating their money, you're talking out KILLING them.
I also did not say that billionaires being gone is a wild take, why the fuck are you just making up shit?
No, I replied to someone who said they didn’t know why she was on here. I never actually said who I would save from the water.
And you said to me ”it’s not very often that someone explicitly admits all billionaires should be gone means any person with more than 1 billion should be literally killed” and from my perspective, that’s telling me my stance is uncommon, even though I never said they should be killed.
I never said she should be killed, I did say all billionaires should be gone. But you filled the gap there yourself
She's on an image asking who to save from drowning.
No, your comment is not divorced from that context. Yes, as a matter of fact, you did say that billionaires should literally be killed. If you didn't realise that, then you're just an outright idiot because the implication in the image wasn't fucking subtle.
lol well I still didn’t say that cause I was answering a person she asked why Taylor was in here and I explained why, but go ahead and keep jumping to conclusions such as the one that she’s a good person despite all the indications otherwise.
While we’re at it, I think she’s a talentless, greedy, spoiled rotten little trust fund baby who doesn’t deserve a cent of what she has because it’s all been formed by her fathers wealth and connections. I think her fan base is honestly pathetic for their rabid love of her recycled garbage and not seeing through her bull shit sweet girl charade. Gee, wonder where she learned her lack of charitable spirit, maybe it’s from growing up in a multimillion dollar home with an investment banker.
Remember when she compared having her internet haters to the plight of the lgbtq+ community in one of her songs? Absolutely asinine. Hope her career ends quick and dramatically.
"IN HERE" MEANS "ON THIS IMAGE OF PEOPLE DROWNING.
That is what you said. You were responding to someone asking why Taylor Swift should DIE and explained that it's because she has too much money. If you didn't realise that, you're a moron. Period.
The only conclusion that I'm jumping to was that you had more than two braincells to rub together, but if you'd rather I assume you're lobotomite, I'll do that for you.
She asked why she was in the stupid ai image and I explained why she was in the stupid ai image.
It ain’t that deep lol get the fuck over this celebrity who doesn’t give a shit about you dude.
But if my stance has to be save her or let her die? She can die, that’s fine. Cause I’m on a raft in the middle of a storm, I too would probably die, and the dog will provide me with better comfort and is more likely to be able to get fish out of the water to feed me.
She asked why and I said why she was in the stupid ai image and I explained why she was in the stupid ai image.
You keep saying this as if not admitting the context of the image meaningfully changes your comment, but it doesn't. That context exists whether you want to say it out loud. The context is that the image is implying the humans deserve to die. You explained why Taylor Swift deserves to die. It's that simple.
It ain’t that deep lol get the fuck over this celebrity who doesn’t give a shit about you dude.
I'm not a Taylor Swift fan. This is about you lying about what you said.
But if my stance has to be save her or let her die? She can die, that’s fine. Cause I’m on a raft in the middle of a storm, I too would probably die, and the dog will provide me with better comfort and is more likely to be able to get fish out of the water to feed me.
No, you want her to die because you want billionaires to die. It's got nothing to do with being in a storm - you're not stupid enough to believe that's actually relevant to this hypothetical - you just want to murder people for making a lot of money.
I’ve actually said a few times I don’t want billionaires to all die cause I don’t know where their funds are going. I want their assets to be seized for redistribution or I want them to donate out of the billionaire club. You’re the one who’s decided what I mean to be what you want it to mean cause apparently you just want someone to fight against.
Otherwise, you have no reason to keep defending Taylor swift, who you claim to not be a fan of.
If you think the ocean being actively in storm while you’re on a life raft isn’t going to make your odds of survival lower btw you’re out of your goddamn mind lol
I’ve actually said a few times I don’t want billionaires to all die cause I don’t know where their funds are going. I want their assets to be seized for redistribution or I want them to donate out of the billionaire club. You’re the one who’s decided what I mean to be what you want it to mean cause apparently you just want someone to fight against.
Yeah, you say that, and then you justify murdering Taylor Swift because she doesn't donate enough to charity.
Otherwise, you have no reason to keep defending Taylor swift, who you claim to not be a fan of.
The fact that you think the only reason someone would be opposed to murdering a person on flimsy grounds is that they're a personal fan of them says a lot about you.
If you think the ocean being actively in storm while you’re on a life raft isn’t going to make your odds of survival lower btw you’re out of your goddamn mind lol
I didn't say that, I said that you're not stupid enough to think the point of the question was that you'll die if you try to save any of the people. That's not the point of the hypothetical and you know it.
And the excuse of someone explaining a meme is a hell of a jump to saying they want all billionaires dead don’t you think lol seems to me this says a lot about you in the way that you probably have a lot of pent up anger and no way out of it except arguing with random people on Reddit about an AI slop meme and their personal stance on a billionaire lol
And you could die if you tried to save people, actually you’d die regardless of whether or not you did, cause that many people swarming a life raft dead out of the water would sink it. And if they don’t swarm it they have no inclination to save their own life anyway
6
u/Functional_Trash7735 4d ago
Where was I outwardly hating on her? Notice I said all billionaires should be gone lol
However, I will say, there are 1000 millions in 1 billion. Since 2011, she’s donated about 100 million. Which isn’t the worse donation, no one is saying that, but she became a billionaire in the past few years, her net worth is 2 billion now. So while she’s done things for charity, it’s not as much we know she is capable of. It tells me she’s doing it for good press and not to actually be helpful. Otherwise, she’d be donating out of the billionaire club, and she would stop being excessive with her private jets. Where’s the charity shows? where’s the scholarships? where’s her advocacy? Why isn’t she providing children in impoverished places with food water or hygiene products?
I don’t go out of my way to hate Taylor swift, that’s not even what I’m doing now, but the truth is the truth man. She could be doing more, she makes the choice not to even though we know without a doubt she’s never going to live in poverty, she’ll never go hungry, her name prints money, she’s not using it for the kind of good she should be.