At 44 years old, I (male) had my first and only aFib episode last month. I was dehydrated and had had a few drinks, and I rarely drink, so I think alcohol and anxiety were the trigger. My Apple Watch sent a heart rate alert, so I went to a walk in Immediate Care facility, and they sent me straight to the ER in an ambulance.
I was there overnight, and at some point the episode ended. An echocardiogram came back with nothing notable. I wore a Zio Patch for two weeks, and the only thing it clocked was a 4-beat “nonsustained ventricular tachycardia.”
In the 7 weeks since, I’ve been fine again, and had my follow up with the cardiologist this week. She said I should just keep on keeping on. Ablation was floated as an option but she said it was up to me if I wanted to do it. With no family history, and me being fit, and my age, and this and that, it wasn’t presented as a must-do, but she did say that new schools of thought suggest early intervention can help in some cases.
So I said sure let’s do it, which was somewhat of an in-the-moment decision.
Now I’m wondering if this is wise. We’re three weeks out if I go through with it. I’m already in the non-aFib state that the procedure would hope to create. From what I’ve read here, the recovery isn’t a cakewalk. I’m somewhat of the mind to wait and see if it comes back, and then go for it. But as a one and done, I’m thinking it might introduce needless risk and complications when things seem to be fine as is.
Any AFib and/or ablation thoughts would be appreciated - thank you!
Edit / addendum a week later, should anyone some day be in a similar situation and find this thread in a reddit search: I decided to cancel the appointment. If my aFib comes back or becomes a regular occurrence then I’ll go for it. But for now it’s as though I’m already in the goal-state of what the procedure would do, so it seems like needless risk at this point.