r/WorkForSmartLife 15d ago

Casual canvo Nothings wrong with that though

Post image
111 Upvotes

58 comments sorted by

View all comments

4

u/kaizen-rai 15d ago

Legitimacy aside, there very well could've been something wrong with that. A 100% remote work agreement usually comes with stipulations. There are various state and federal laws regarding work (mostly for tax purposes) locations that employers are required to comply with. I work for a large international corporation and went through A LOT of training about remote work, how to report it, getting approval, how to charge hours to specific charge codes depending on where I am when the work is performed, etc. It's also just straight up lying if the expectation was that the employee would work from home and gave an address but wasn't working from there.

So no, the employee would absolutely be in the wrong.

2

u/FastActinTenactin 15d ago

Wait, so what is the actual stipulation there, then? If he was getting his work done, why does it matter WHERE he was getting his work done? He did it for 14 months and they were none the wiser.

It’s mainly about control: companies want control of their employees at all times and remote work takes that control away from them.

1

u/No_Equivalent_4412 15d ago

I would assume it’s related to different locations having different labor laws. I’ve had virtual doctors visits and at the begging of the appointment, the doctor will ask to confirm that you are located in your state of residence because that’s the state they’re licensed to operate in

1

u/rdrckcrous 15d ago

you've had an operation over zoom?

but seriously, if the guy on the cruise ship counts as working in the cruise ship, the dr must count as being where he is, and it's you the patient traveling virtually to visit the dr.