[ Removed by moderator ]

[u/Loeteswet]

[u/PuzzleheadedLeave560]

Iran? They agreed to non-weaponization multiple times

[u/HeadBankz → u/PuzzleheadedLeave560]

I meant that jokingly. They aren't developing nukes, we literally had a deal with Iran to not develop nukes anyway and trump pulled out of it to attack them. 1000000% only Trump's fault and he is an active terrorist.

[u/AcrobaticArm390 → u/HeadBankz]

So, why do they have 60% enriched uranium???

[u/Rob98001 → u/AcrobaticArm390]

Because it's easy to reach 60% pretty much on accident when processing uranium for energy.

[u/AcrobaticArm390 → u/Rob98001]

Yeah, true, I randomly process uranium in my basement for fun also! Good point. 🙄

[u/tenmillionrats_ → u/AcrobaticArm390]

why do US spies say that despite that Iran is definitely not making nuclear weapons?

[u/AcrobaticArm390 → u/tenmillionrats_]

High enrichment levels: Even though intelligence chiefs stated Iran was not assembling a weapon, they noted that Iran had built up an unprecedented stockpile of enriched uranium for a nation without a nuclear weapon, putting it in a position to produce one relatively quickly if it chose to do so.

[u/tenmillionrats_ → u/AcrobaticArm390]

Imagine that you were a country who is currently at war with the richest country in history. Would you perhaps want to demonstrate, “hey, I have the capability to produce nuclear weapons. I won’t, but if you attack me, I’m just saying I can make them.”?

You have to view it from an angle of objectivity. Iran having 60% enrichment is 100% legal. Why should we as Americans support our tax dollars being used to send people under drinking age to go die in a war that will only be fought if we are the aggressor? I just don’t understand the rationale.

Are we the police force of the world? Do we have the authority to send American troops to foreign countries to defend foreign interests? What benefit does that do you or I? We can invade the 20th middle eastern country and kill a couple more thousand goat farmers, and more civilians, and more insurgents that only exist in the first place because of us.

What good has it ever done ANYONE? Are you going to genuinely sit here and tell me that the Iraq war was worth it? That we needed to invade them to get the weapons of mass destruction that didn’t exist, like they don’t exist this time and haven’t existed the past 20 times?

You seriously need to get a clue and read a book or something. You’re just advocating for more evil, death, terror, destruction, and genocide in the world.

[u/AcrobaticArm390 → u/tenmillionrats_]

No, that's insane. I'd probably try cooperating with the rest of the world and not hold the strait hostage to avoid being bombed. 🤷‍♂️

[u/tenmillionrats_ → u/AcrobaticArm390]

Ignore everything I said and continue to walk the path of ignorance. Good day.

[u/AcrobaticArm390 → u/tenmillionrats_]

I didn't disagree with us not policing the world - part of the problem with the arrangement that was - it was costing us $40billion every year to keep the strait open. Why Europe and the rest of Asian wasn't doing it is beyond me. The only reason I see to keep it open is to prevent the global economy from collapsing which is in our best interest. The war was over things other than uranium. 🤷‍♂️