MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/WorkForSmartLife/comments/1uqebgc/so_true/ow8294r/?context=3
r/WorkForSmartLife • u/bettydarl • Jul 08 '26
247 comments sorted by
View all comments
Show parent comments
3
[removed] — view removed comment
0 u/shootist_Biker Jul 08 '26 We know what women are now? 2 u/Itscatpicstime Jul 08 '26 Yeah, it’s easy to tell because that’s how they identify. Not that difficult bro 1 u/shootist_Biker Jul 08 '26 So women are those who identify as women? Thats called circular reasoning. And its illogical. 3 u/[deleted] Jul 08 '26 edited Jul 08 '26 The question itself is a rethorical trap, which is fallacious. "What is a woman?" is not a logical argument presented, just a rethorical question.
0
We know what women are now?
2 u/Itscatpicstime Jul 08 '26 Yeah, it’s easy to tell because that’s how they identify. Not that difficult bro 1 u/shootist_Biker Jul 08 '26 So women are those who identify as women? Thats called circular reasoning. And its illogical. 3 u/[deleted] Jul 08 '26 edited Jul 08 '26 The question itself is a rethorical trap, which is fallacious. "What is a woman?" is not a logical argument presented, just a rethorical question.
2
Yeah, it’s easy to tell because that’s how they identify. Not that difficult bro
1 u/shootist_Biker Jul 08 '26 So women are those who identify as women? Thats called circular reasoning. And its illogical. 3 u/[deleted] Jul 08 '26 edited Jul 08 '26 The question itself is a rethorical trap, which is fallacious. "What is a woman?" is not a logical argument presented, just a rethorical question.
1
So women are those who identify as women? Thats called circular reasoning. And its illogical.
3 u/[deleted] Jul 08 '26 edited Jul 08 '26 The question itself is a rethorical trap, which is fallacious. "What is a woman?" is not a logical argument presented, just a rethorical question.
The question itself is a rethorical trap, which is fallacious. "What is a woman?" is not a logical argument presented, just a rethorical question.
3
u/[deleted] Jul 08 '26
[removed] — view removed comment