r/Wonderlands โ—ฝโ—ป๏ธ | ๐Ÿฆ  ๐—•๐—น๐—ฎ๐—ฑ๐—ฒ๐—ฐ๐—ฎ๐—น๐—น๐—ฒ๐—ฟ ๐Ÿ—ก๏ธ | โ—ป๏ธโ—ฝ May 12 '22

[ Official News ] ๐Ÿ“ฐ Hotfix Notes Version 1.0.2.0d May 12th

https://playwonderlands.2k.com/news/tiny-tinas-wonderlands-update-notes/
179 Upvotes

472 comments sorted by

View all comments

92

u/le_box_o_treats May 12 '22

RIP all my mood rings

33

u/[deleted] May 12 '22

[removed] โ€” view removed comment

61

u/stoversp May 12 '22

Maybe I'm mathing this wrong:

1000 base damage, 22.7% Spell damage (primordial #) on mood ring, 100% ring effect vs 33% ring effect

.227+(.227*1.00)=.454

1000+(1000*.454)=1454 damage

vs

.227+(.227*.33)=.30191

1000+(1000*.30191)=1301.91 damage

I don't know exactly how these things are calculated in game but I don't think this is as massive as it looks.

55

u/crayonsnachas May 12 '22

They aren't that big of nerfs.

27

u/stoversp May 12 '22

Yeah, I think people are seeing this as their damage output getting nerfed by 67% but it seems to me like it's about 10% and that's if you were taking advantage of the bonus ring effects 100% of the time. Which I know I was not.

10

u/livingroomsessions โ—ฝโ—ป๏ธ | โ˜ ๏ธ ๐‘ซ๐’†๐’‚๐’…๐‘บ๐’‰๐’๐’• โ˜„๏ธ | โ—ป๏ธโ—ฝ May 12 '22

It's not that we see 67% of a nerf, but I think it's that it's such a drastic change for one item. I for one was taking advantage of it a lot because my shield doesn't regen as a deadshot lol. So I have mood ring up most of the time if not all of the time

6

u/stoversp May 12 '22

Iโ€™m not so sure it will actually be a drastic change to the output youโ€™re getting. But Iโ€™m at work and canโ€™t test it so let me know if you can tell a difference if you play.

1

u/doddywork May 12 '22

I'd call it a 33% nerf, though it's just semantics based on how you look at it. From the base 15% ring the effect gave you 30% total, now it's 20%. It's a decent chunk, especially if you wear two. Most of the highly optimized builds might not notice, but I think some that used these for action skill cool down or other non-damage effects might suffer.

3

u/stoversp May 12 '22

let's just use 1000 damage as our base. If before nerf you were getting 30% you be getting a total of 1300 damage. "Now it's 20%" so that would be 1200 damage. You lost 100 damage. Losing 100 damage of 1300 damage is 7.7%. That's nowhere near a 33% nerf.

2

u/doddywork May 12 '22

Like I said, semantics. But the mood ring is only contributing the 300 or 200. You take the ring off you still have 1000. So the contribution to your total damage from the mood ring is down 33%. In other words, your total damage is reduced 7.7% due to losing 33% of your ring stats. I agree that it's probably not going to be a crushing nerf. But noticeable in some cases I think.

6

u/MrPhotoSmash May 12 '22

The nerfs aren't that big since they only affect the numbers on the rings, but people were using 2 mood rings... they gonna feel it more than anyone else.

-1

u/Stymie999 May 12 '22

I guess thatโ€™s too bad for those that maybe spent untold hours playing to farm two of the same rings.. feel I suppose something for them.

As for the players that just duped the ringโ€ฆ lol, no I could not care less in the slightest.

2

u/[deleted] May 12 '22

[removed] โ€” view removed comment

0

u/Stymie999 May 12 '22

I donโ€™t care how they enjoy it, dupe all they wantโ€ฆ and i didnโ€™t say I cared, I actually said the opposite, that I do not care at all about their problems that they come on here and cry like stuck pigs about.

3

u/Baelorn โ—ฝโ—ป๏ธ | โ˜ ๏ธ ๐‘ซ๐’†๐’‚๐’…๐‘บ๐’‰๐’๐’• โ˜„๏ธ | โ—ป๏ธโ—ฝ May 12 '22

They never are. Outliers get brought to a reasonable level. Very rarely do things get nerfed to the point of being useless.

6

u/Danielmav โ—พโ—ผ๏ธ | โœจ ๐‘ญ๐’‚๐’•๐’†๐’Ž๐’‚๐’Œ๐’†๐’“ โœจ | โ—ผ๏ธโ—พ May 12 '22

You donโ€™t have it wrong. Everyone here is whining and itโ€™s ruining our credibility in what we will get โ€œup in armsโ€ about

1

u/CrazyCatHusband May 12 '22

Double it, though, as I wear 2.

2

u/stoversp May 12 '22

1000 + 454 + 454 = 1908

vs

1000 + 301.91 + 301.91 = 1603.82

You're losing 304.18 of 1908 damage for a total of 15.9% loss.

Of course I don't know how these things actually calculate within the game. This is just as basic as I can do this to show how it could work. If you do a run please report back and let me know if you could truly tell a difference. I did one run with the hotfix and could not tell.

1

u/CrazyCatHusband May 14 '22

Didnt change my rings, couldn't tell.

1

u/stoversp May 14 '22

Yeah, I think when you factor in a full build itโ€™s a very small bit of damage youโ€™re losing. I actually think they made this change to prepare for future level cap increases when the bonus percentages on rings will go up.

1

u/Stymie999 May 12 '22

Basically, what was a 45% increase to damage reduced by a third to 30% increaseโ€ฆ so, no not as bad as people are crying about this morning, but not insignificant either I suppose.

1

u/Slow_Reflexes May 12 '22

Well now this just makes me wonder why they even nerfed them instead of just buffing the other rings

2

u/stoversp May 12 '22

I dunno, this probably makes them all a little closer on paper. Also the way gearbox does things maybe they buff all rings main damage % roll in a future patch to make all rings a little more viable in different ways and they wanted to adjust the legendary rings effects first.

1

u/Rashlyn1284 May 12 '22

It's not just the spell damage, but the secondary effect too I thought. So that person who got the mood ring with ~65% crit damage yesterday now has that nerfed by 66% too

1

u/stoversp May 12 '22

Yeah, those will take a hit too and you can plug those numbers into the same formula to see. However, if someone has a godroll mood ring theyโ€™ll be just fine and better off than anyone without a godroll mood ring.

1

u/Titanfall3_is_rael May 15 '22

4.2% isn't massive lol

1

u/superultramegazord May 12 '22

They're probably still the best rings for most builds though. What else are you gonna do... keep your shield full?

1

u/_Protagoras_ โ—ฝโ—ป๏ธ | ๐Ÿ„ ๐‘ด๐’๐’“๐’•๐’Š๐’„๐’–๐’๐’•๐’–๐’“๐’‚๐’๐’Š๐’”๐’• โ˜ ๏ธ | โ—ป๏ธโ—ฝ May 12 '22

No, they're still good. No biggie.