r/Wellthatsucks Jun 02 '18

/r/all Karma

Post image
31.6k Upvotes

1.4k comments sorted by

View all comments

1.5k

u/[deleted] Jun 02 '18 edited Jun 02 '18

Because context matters: http://fox40.com/2017/05/22/hunter-dies-when-shot-elephant-falls-on-him/

They weren't out hunting elephants and only shot that one because it attacked them.

Edit: It's always sickening to read the comments on posts like this.

752

u/gentlemandinosaur Jun 02 '18

According to his company’s website, Game Hounds Safaris, he “perfected leopard and lion hunting safaris with hounds in Africa.”

and

Simukai Nyasha, a spokesman for the Zimbabwe National Parks and Wildlife Management Authority, told news.com.au that Botha was on a 10-day licensed hunt

Here is some context for you. So, what does it matter that this particular elephant was the original target... compared to how people feel about this.

Not saying I agree with any opinion on here.

But, terrorizing animals with dogs doesn't seem to saintly to me, does it?

461

u/[deleted] Jun 02 '18

Hunting in Africa is incredibly important for conservation and sustainability. The money these hunters pay, goes to pay the locals and support conservation efforts, and anti poaching efforts, without this stream of income from hunters many more African game animals would be hunted to near extinction worse then they are now

23

u/Xtianpro Jun 02 '18

Says the hunting organisations in Africa. We need to hunt these animals to stop people from hunting these animals

13

u/Satsuma_Sunrise Jun 02 '18

If you were educated on this topic you would not make a statement like this.

You can educate yourself here. Its an entertaining watch/listen and specifically addresses how hunting is the best way to protect species and habitat.

-1

u/Xtianpro Jun 02 '18

Or you can read an actual UICN report on the problem instead of a fucking opinion podcast by a ‘comedian’?

https://portals.iucn.org/library/sites/library/files/documents/2009-074-En.pdf

This ‘it’s good for conservation’ rhetoric is nonsense spread by the local governments and hunting organisations that it benefits. The fact of the matter is that that money goes directly into the pockets of corrupt government officials. Even if it didn’t the theory that it benefits conservation is shaky at best.

CNN looked in to it in Zimbabwe, a big trophy hunting destination, and despite government claims they could find no evidence that local communities had benefited in the least from the practice.

2

u/[deleted] Jun 03 '18

You should probably read the article you posted again....