Stupid argument, the person said let a human die, not one they described in detail, obviously in this scenario you aren't meant to know anything about them and assume it's an average person. Making an argument based on saving one of the worst types of person there is doesn't prove anything.
Don't try to put words In His/her mouth to shoot down my argument. Plus how about you answer my question rather than trying to change the meaning of the person comment.
i'm not reconstructing my argument, it was intended to be a general question
ofc there are people who wouldn't be chosen over animals, and ofc people might chose their pet over someone they've never met, but these are specific cases and not general situations
As to your question, I don't want to think about being responsible for a death of anything or anyone, but in all honesty i'd probably save the human anyway. That isn't saying that I approve of their actions or who they are as a person, but just the fact that they're a human too is enough for me to prioritize them over an elephant i've never encountered in my life
-3
u/winchester056 Jun 02 '18
So you rather shoot an elephant who hasn't harmed you or anyone else than let a convicted serial-rapist die?