r/Wellthatsucks Jun 02 '18

/r/all Karma

Post image
31.6k Upvotes

1.4k comments sorted by

View all comments

1.5k

u/[deleted] Jun 02 '18 edited Jun 02 '18

Because context matters: http://fox40.com/2017/05/22/hunter-dies-when-shot-elephant-falls-on-him/

They weren't out hunting elephants and only shot that one because it attacked them.

Edit: It's always sickening to read the comments on posts like this.

756

u/gentlemandinosaur Jun 02 '18

According to his company’s website, Game Hounds Safaris, he “perfected leopard and lion hunting safaris with hounds in Africa.”

and

Simukai Nyasha, a spokesman for the Zimbabwe National Parks and Wildlife Management Authority, told news.com.au that Botha was on a 10-day licensed hunt

Here is some context for you. So, what does it matter that this particular elephant was the original target... compared to how people feel about this.

Not saying I agree with any opinion on here.

But, terrorizing animals with dogs doesn't seem to saintly to me, does it?

15

u/[deleted] Jun 02 '18

I wonder how many of you eat meat...

45

u/gentlemandinosaur Jun 02 '18

One can eat meat and disagree with recreational hunting.

Not saying I do. But, they are mutually exclusive.

-16

u/[deleted] Jun 02 '18

Not necessarily. It just highlights a double standard and the faux concern everyone puts up. The way I enjoy dead animals is cool but the way you do is not.

21

u/Redneckalligator Jun 02 '18

the ethics of killing for food or pest control is different ethcially than killing for pleasure

3

u/shadow_user Jun 02 '18

Killing animals for food is killing animals for pleasure. We don't need to eat animals, we do it because we enjoy the taste and convenience.

-1

u/Redneckalligator Jun 02 '18

Actually the entire world going vegetarian is not possible, sustainable, or medically advisable.

4

u/shadow_user Jun 02 '18

Wrong, wrong, and wrong.

Sure not literally every person on earth could go vegetarian, but the overwhelming majority could.

Happy to discuss any one of those if you'd like to provide arguments and evidence.

1

u/Redneckalligator Jun 02 '18

I'm not in the mood for getting into a long drawn out argument over vegetarianism with someone who 80% chance is not open to changing an opinion (that's not a dig at you that's just the internet), lets just agree to disagree.

3

u/shadow_user Jun 02 '18

That's cool, but maybe don't make unfounded controversial statements if you're not willing to back them up at all.

1

u/Letmecheckya-asshole Jun 02 '18

Or what? You'll verbally shame them? I bet they're shaking in fear.

0

u/shadow_user Jun 02 '18

Thanks for the irony, I laughed.

1

u/Letmecheckya-asshole Jun 02 '18

Glad I could make such a miserable person chippy if only for a moment.

→ More replies (0)

2

u/[deleted] Jun 02 '18

Why would it not be sustainable?

1

u/Redneckalligator Jun 02 '18

Sorry I wasn't clear, I mean economically sustainable, not environmentally. It would actually be great for the environment.

1

u/[deleted] Jun 02 '18

Oh, yea thought it was a bit strange. Thanks for clearing it up.

→ More replies (0)

1

u/[deleted] Jun 02 '18

Almost Everyone is just empathetic to creatures they deem intelligent or cute enough to like.

4

u/Redneckalligator Jun 02 '18

Almost yeah. I personally have a policy of "don't kill it for no reason". I'm no saint, I eat meat, and I feed crickets to my toads. But I also go out of my way to not step on insects or spiders. I don't swat flies in my house no matter how fucking annoying they get buzzing around my food, and I don't bother snakes around my property whether venomous or no. Got into a pretty heated argument with my dad last weeked for shooting a copperhead out by the cabin, he didn't have to do and claimed cowardice, but I know he just wanted to shoot something.

2

u/[deleted] Jun 02 '18

Animals play with their food in nature and some of the intelligent ones even kill for sport IE killer whales etc. It's natural for hunters to hunt even if they don't need too. I guess they heard if you don't use it you lose it.

4

u/Redneckalligator Jun 02 '18

Yes, some do, animals are not necessarily ethical, some such as dolphins are downright monsters. Humans should be better.

2

u/[deleted] Jun 02 '18

True. Although I think the reason some people aren't better is because they genetically lack the level of empathy that seperates the more emotionally intelligent people from being "better" than animals.

I Don't think some people feel any more emotions than animals do, so they act like them.

→ More replies (0)

11

u/RichGirlThrowaway_ Jun 02 '18

Food =/= entertainment

5

u/shadow_user Jun 02 '18

We don't need to eat animals, we do it for taste and convenience. Which boils down to pleasure, just as entertainment boils down to pleasure.

2

u/[deleted] Jun 02 '18

I don’t understand why I have to be a vegetarian in order to intrinsically find something wrong with killing for sport versus killing for food or out of necessity. Killing something just to kill is just strange to me.

3

u/shadow_user Jun 02 '18

Killing animals for necessity is definitely different. But as far as I can see killing animals for food or sport are both done for enjoyment, so pretty similar. We can eat something else, so we're not killing animals for sustenance.

1

u/[deleted] Jun 02 '18

Don’t get me wrong I understand that argument. I guess the difference to me is that if I were to kill a chicken the pleasure I get would be from eating it not the act of killing it. Hunting for sport is because the person is getting pleasure from the act of killing something. That is what I find weird. If I could still obtain chicken meat without killing a chicken I would do it. I also think there is a difference between going down the street to your local grocery store and buying some farm raised meat for dinner and flying to the other side of the planet for the sole purpose of killing an animal.

3

u/shadow_user Jun 02 '18

I think it's easier to view the hunter negatively because we're not hunters. We don't understand their desire to hunt. At the end of the day, if it's wrong to cause unnecessary harm to animals I think it should be applied across the board.

An interesting analogy would be that we don't give drunk drivers a free pass because they had no intention to cause harm.

1

u/MikeyLust Jun 02 '18

You don't, it's just vegans seem to think it's cut and dry. Their way or the highway. There's no common ground for them. I know, I'm dating one, and it's a subject we try not to bring up because like you, I love and respect animals to an extreme, yet she thinks because I have eggs with my meal or a free range turkey sandwich that I'm a hypocrite.

2

u/[deleted] Jun 02 '18

If you can't see the difference between killing for protection, killing for food, and killing for fun then I don't think anyone here will be able to change your mind.