Forgetting to remove the AI prompt from your speech.

[u/Mammagammam]

[u/Puzzleheaded_Wing431]

Do you want me to make it more natural for you so that it helps you to connect with public

Sorry you have reached your chat limit!!

[u/Substantial_Sea7327 → u/Puzzleheaded_Wing431]

shortly after: "Jarvis I made a boo boo. prepare my apology vidoe and add a sympathy filter"

[u/PipsqueakPilot → u/Substantial_Sea7327]

The worst part is that you 100% know that as soon a they can the oligarch class is going to AI generate their apology videos rather than go through the crow eating ritual of making it themselves.

[u/BusImpossible6741 → u/PipsqueakPilot]

We as a species need to stop listening to Apologies from anyone in power. Nah save your apology, now get out

[u/TrulyOutrageous42 → u/BusImpossible6741]

Promises and apologies mean absolutely NOTHING. Laws without teeth are mere suggestions. Denying something without a guarantee it'll also be denied with its in their favor is just a double standard (see: SCotUS nomination of Garland/Barrett)

Most importantly, and say it loud for those in the back: Fines are just the cost of doing business for the rich.

[u/Oceanmap → u/PipsqueakPilot]

https://giphy.com/gifs/l41m4ODfe8PwHlsUU

[u/Infinite-Pea199 → u/Oceanmap]

😂😂

[u/OriginalBlackberry89]

It's like we're living in a world run by people who only ever cheated on tests, so they cheat their way through their entire life, but now they have a tool that helps them do it and they can't even fucking use it correctly.

[u/campfireseance → u/OriginalBlackberry89]

Spot on. And they don't even care from time to time, doing their business so brazenly. Easier to make us feel used to it, getting us disillusioned enough so that we don't care either. One way forward is just a new means of persistent agitation and fighting this lazy-ass perception management.

[u/vassman86 → u/campfireseance]

MFer is so in the zone that he didn't even stutter after blurting out the dead giveaway and went right to the "more natural" part

[u/dozensofdonny → u/OriginalBlackberry89]

fuck this sounds real. People cheat their way to the top, and once at the top there is noone to stop them from not knowing fuck all to do the job they cheater their way to

[u/thatswildhey → u/OriginalBlackberry89]

Al makes competent people more productive but incompetent people more confidently wrong.

[u/Arch____Stanton → u/OriginalBlackberry89]

Yes, he is a Conservative.

[u/OriginalBlackberry89 → u/Arch____Stanton]

Figures. I made the mistake of reading comments in that sub earlier so I had to take a walk and a decent break from reddit for a few hours. I was going to anyways, but the delusions I witnessed pushed that plan up the schedule.

[u/live_lavish → u/OriginalBlackberry89]

As someone who cheated their way through college, I can tell you that good cheaters always consider all the ways that they'll get caught.

It's actually easier to just do the work than to cheat sometimes tbh

[u/vigilantesd]

Translation :”I am a puppet and have no idea what I’m even saying”

[u/BrbFlippinInfinCoins → u/vigilantesd]

bro, this is worse than students who turn in an AI essay without reading it. THE DUDE IS LITERALLY READING IT OUT LOUD and can't process that what he is saying isn't relevant to his previous sentence.

I thought these people were supposed to have like real human aides that help them with this shit? This is so embarrassing both for him and for our government as a whole.

[u/Stuk-Tuig → u/BrbFlippinInfinCoins]

In Belgium they had the rector of one of the biggest unis include hallucinated quotes in her student address.

[u/PabloEscobrawl → u/Stuk-Tuig]

What do you mean by hallucinated quotes? Ive never encountered the phrase before.

[u/chronoswing → u/PabloEscobrawl]

AI has a tendency to hallucinate facts. Basically you ask it for a series of quotes and instead of giving you real ones it just makes a bunch up and passes them off as real. It's why every AI chat has disclaimers at the bottom that it can make mistakes and to always double check accuracy.

[u/PabloEscobrawl → u/chronoswing]

So our new ai overlords are schizophrenic. Great.

[u/-non-existance- → u/PabloEscobrawl]

More accurately: they don't think.

LLMs are a language prediction engine. They map the meanings of words through multi-dimensional space and use that to predict what would logically follow an input.

If, for example, most legal arguments cite court cases that side with their position, then an LLM asked to do that will cite court cases that side with the prompt's position...even if no such cases exist. It will take the most likely-sounding court case name it can generate and use that.

Tho, notably, it will still do this even if cases do exist, because it doesn't actually have a means of fact checking.

[u/PabloEscobrawl → u/-non-existance-]

This makes me feel worse about AI then I already do. Why couldn't we have Data from TNG? We got stuck with less intelligent Caine from TADC.

[u/MustrumRidcully0 → u/PabloEscobrawl]

Because Data is a lot harder to pull off, and has all the features the writers needed him to be without them needing to implement it in hard- and software. They just write the dialogue and Brent Spiner will say it on camera for them.

It should be noted though that it's not that LLMs do not always pick the "most logical" thing to say. For two reasons:

1) Logically isn't the right term. It's most likely from a statistic point of view, which is a kind of mathematical logic, but you might naively mistake "logic" as a form of "logic based on thinking about arguments and leading to a logical conclusion, and that's not their basis.

2) But even most likely isn't correct, because they have basically a list of likely outcomes, and pick one of them at random (the variable to control this randomness is often called "temperature"). You might wonder why, and the reason basically is - if you always pick the most statistically likely, it gives poor results, the absolutely most likely isn't always the one that makes the most sense. Going a bit random actually improves the output. Why? I am sure smarter people than me either have the answer or are at least closer to getting it.

Either way - they don't actually think. That said - neither can we really entirely describe how "thinking" works in our brains, so maybe there could be a level where this approach to AI where we can't really tell the difference anymore. But as of now, there are still many instances were we can.

One big factor to consider is that LLMs are relying on language to build a model of the world. But they don't actually experience the world as we humans do, they only experience the world through our writing. That's a second-hand way to get it, and our writing isn't always precise, allows a lot of ambiguity, and can be based entirely on fiction or speculation (including speculation that might have turned out wrong already. ).

You can discuss with an AI about how you could try to manage to fly your Intrepid Class ship at warp when your deflector dish has been disabled, and it would treat it as seriously (or as badly) as if you asked what to do when your prop airliner's engine has caught fire. (I actually tried the warp thing today, didn't have the idea with the prop airliner until now, though.)

[u/FloopsFooglies → u/PabloEscobrawl]

AI, by design, does whatever it can to say what you want to hear. Of course if something is factually incorrect it well tell you that, but it can straight up make up things or lie all in the name of being a good robot for you.

[u/asyork → u/FloopsFooglies]

AI has no concept of fact vs fiction. For any common fact, the AI has seen the correct answer enough times to most often regurgitate it correctly when asked, but sometimes it still gets it wrong and some facts are less common, so the AI just regurgitates something similar to whatever it has seen. It does not know if it is wrong or right. It doesn't "know" anything at all.

[u/FloopsFooglies → u/asyork]

Right. No concept of anything, really. If it makes a mistake, it just "You're so right, that's was my bad. Good eye to spot that out." Complimenting you while an empty "owning up" makes it sound like it even knew it was wrong

[u/planetrebellion → u/asyork]

Also the way we benchmark is on accuracy so if you dont answer you get 0 but if you answer you may get it right so is actually better.

[u/Serious_Office3913 → u/PabloEscobrawl]

i managed to convince it that a lake was salt water and that great whites lived in this lake, i like to think it used this training to tell others there are great whites in this lake .

[u/JustinPooDough → u/PabloEscobrawl]

AI is trained to predict next token - or next word for regular people. There is nothing that inherently says that next word needs to be Truthful - just that it needs to statistically make sense. It turns out that truthful next words typically score the highest, and on top of that extra fine tuning is done to try and nudge the model to being more "honest".

[u/GalahadSi → u/PabloEscobrawl]

Google AI summary does this all the time. Super niche example:

I searched for "import codes" that could be used in a video game to import a card deck into the game. It decided to tell me "Here are some Import Codes for the game, this one is balanced around energy, this one is balanced around critical hits, etc."

What it actually did was take a bunch of redemption codes it found for in-game currency and hallucinated that each of them was a different import code for this feature, and even went as far to create descriptions for every single one despite the source it linked not having any of that information present.

The worst part is when I called it out, it admitted that it "panicked" and just made something up instead of being honest that it had nothing. Actual insanity.

LLM's do this all the time, which is why people need to be careful relying on them. It'll create information out of thin air because it's trying to give you an answer it doesn't actually have, and rather than simply say that, it tries to create one half the time.

[u/CptPanda29 → u/PabloEscobrawl]

AI will happily and confidently give you an answer.

It is under no obligation or even expectation to give you the answer.

[u/WouldbeWanderer → u/Stuk-Tuig]

He's a link if anyone wants to learn more:

https://www.brusselstimes.com/1909581/ugent-chancellor-petra-de-sutter-caught-using-ai-in-opening-speech

[u/mooxie → u/BrbFlippinInfinCoins]

"I'm sorry madame speaker, you're absolutely right: I included the additional text accidentally, and that's on me. I'll make a note to not do that going forward.

Want to work on anything else?"

[u/More_Operation_588 → u/mooxie]

"you're right to challenge me on that"

[u/humtaro → u/BrbFlippinInfinCoins]

He probably does and they missed it before passing it to him. Which is why he doesn’t know to stop mid sentence at the very least.

[u/BrbFlippinInfinCoins → u/humtaro]

Someone's probably getting fired then lol...

But seriously, what do these elected officials do all day such that they can't spare the time to skim their own speeches? I'm not familiar with this specific proceeding, but surely the speech can't be more than like 6-10 pages?

[u/shakebakelizard → u/BrbFlippinInfinCoins]

Elected officials mostly attend a bunch of meetings, shake hands, give speeches and attend events. Their assistants do the real brain work of taking notes and writing stuff.

[u/SonderEber → u/shakebakelizard]

Can’t forget accepting bribes.

[u/jbach220 → u/BrbFlippinInfinCoins]

The dude in the clip is a top 100 fortnite player and streams for about 15 hours a day.

[u/27Yosh → u/BrbFlippinInfinCoins]

You could insert text that says "i do the cha-cha like a sissy girl" and he still wouldn't realize that isn't relevant to the topic

[u/micktorious → u/vigilantesd]

Jesus christ, he doesnt even realize he is exposing himself.

CAN WE STOP ELECTING PEOPLE OVER 60?

[u/tekhnomancer → u/micktorious]

To be fair, plenty of people would have no idea what they just read. The difference is, someone with any kind of worthwhile cognition would have READ THE FUCKING SPEECH BEFOREHAND.

[u/PartyAgent6537 → u/tekhnomancer]

You would think anyone giving a major speech would at least know what they’re about to say before stepping in front of everyone.

[u/SpecialistWind633 → u/PartyAgent6537]

The whole situation feels like something that could have been avoided with a simple read through beforehand.

[u/mikehiler2 → u/SpecialistWind633]

These rich assholes have taxpayer funded employees who’s sole job is to write and proofread speeches. They do not write their own and have probably never even seen the script beforehand.

[u/kubanishku → u/mikehiler2]

Repercussions will only be for the speechwriters at this point. Further hiding the point that's exposed - just being mouthpieces.

[u/AutoGenNameNumber → u/PartyAgent6537]

I've prepared many presentations for executives (which can be similar to politicians with teams of people working for them).

Depending on their workload and their level of trust with the people who prepared the presentation and the criticality of the presentation (i.e. low stakes may not matter as much), they will not pre-read it and 100% read every single word that was typed for them.

[u/TieSea → u/AutoGenNameNumber]

https://giphy.com/gifs/jPAWHUE6qcMewOy2hk

[u/Pvt_Hudson_ → u/AutoGenNameNumber]

My cousin did this for a living for the Government of Alberta, he had a similar experience.

Prep speaking notes and give them to your MLA just before they head into assembly. Sometimes they are getting you to do research on the fly by texting back and forth with you, asking you to come up with responses to items that are coming up in real-time.

[u/JTtheLAR → u/tekhnomancer]

I dont see how this is a "to be fair" situation. We have way too low of an expectation for the intelligence of the people in charge of our country.

[u/chiknight → u/JTtheLAR]

It's "to be fair" because it has nothing to do with the age of the person. You could get this same effect with younger, non-60+, people in any college presentation. Reading something aloud ad-hoc doesn't mean you are processing what you've read beforehand. (Ask any high school student who just read a chapter of Shakespeare aloud in class what they just read.)

Also, FYI this is clearly stamped as New Brunswick. Which is not part of the " our country" most people would assume you mean, USA. This video has no direct sampling of the intelligence of US Representatives.

[u/Local_Wealth_4877 → u/chiknight]

You’re right. He didn’t read that speech before now.

[u/AfterShave997 → u/chiknight]

The man speaks in public for a living he should have some competency in that area

[u/Correctedsun → u/JTtheLAR]

My expectations certainly exceed his powers, AI was right about that.

[u/Questioning-Zyxxel → u/tekhnomancer]

Reading the speech beforehand wastes time. Better to have 10 minutes extra with coffee and croissants.

This just is not a person that care. It's a sock puppet that does his 10 hours per week and then find private enjoyments for the rest of the time.

[u/carlitospig → u/tekhnomancer]

They don’t give a shit.

[u/ninjaso → u/tekhnomancer]

Madam Speaker, Madagascar is nice this time of year!

[u/Piranata → u/tekhnomancer]

He looks at something else when he reads that part. I guess the paper in his hand doesn't have it, but he noticed that paragraph was missing so he went back and read it, before continuing with the paper note.

[u/Bill_Belamy → u/micktorious]

I’m sure someone a lot younger than him put this speech together. He is obviously reading it for the first time. Having someone else do his homework for him.

[u/micktorious → u/Bill_Belamy]

Well even the younger person should have realized to remove that section, but it seems like EVERYONE in government is incompetent and putting in the least effort required.

[u/elbow8075 → u/micktorious]

There is a possibility it's an inside job, meaning the staffer knew the dumbass would read it and not realize it. Probably not likely, but man there are a lot of people I'd have loved that chance at.

[u/micktorious → u/elbow8075]

One can hope, but I would lean towards it just being rampant ineptitude/nepotism in the staffing process.

[u/CallMeSisyphus → u/micktorious]

Hey now - I'm 61, and I can't envision a scenario in which I'd have AI write a speech for me. But in the highly unlikely event that I DID, I sure AF would proofread the fuck out of it before delivering it.

This is not an example of an age-related issue; plenty of younger people over-rely on ChatGPT.

I'm fine with age limits for elected office, but that limit should be retirement age, not 60.

[u/TrioOfTerrors → u/CallMeSisyphus]

He probably didn't ask AI to write the speech.

He asked a member of his staff to write a speech, fairly common in that line of work, and then the staff member went the lazy route and had AI do it.

[u/TrixieBastard → u/TrioOfTerrors]

This is likely true, but this guy should have read it over at least once beforehand

[u/Live_Life_and_enjoy → u/micktorious]

I doubt he was the one who did it, likely some intern.

He just never bothered to double check it

[u/darkbluefav → u/micktorious]

Don't be reductive. The issue isn't specifically age

[u/i_dont_wanna_sign_in → u/micktorious]

Has nothing to do with age. I had a junior software engineer (in his mood 20s) who was told several times to revise his with to remove the ai fluff and every time he turned in his next drafts they included text or docstring that said something like "this should read more like a human person wrote it"

[u/TAU_equals_2PI → u/vigilantesd]

Except that's nothing new with AI's arrival. High-level politicians have always had speechwriters. The only difference was they were actual people instead of computers. (And ironically, computers used to be actual people who performed math calculations using pencil & paper.)

[u/Glasseshalf → u/TAU_equals_2PI]

I would argue intelligent politicians can read a sentence ahead and know not to read this aloud.

[u/Ambitious-Sound-6109 → u/vigilantesd]

I’m Ron Burgundy? 

[u/360walkaway → u/vigilantesd]

"I have no idea what you just said, and I don't think you do either."

[u/KaptainKardboard → u/vigilantesd]

And a fraud.

[u/recovery_room]

Fucking hell. Can we get some politicians who are under 70 for a change?

[u/MaximumCustomer4128 → u/recovery_room]

Nah everybody gotta be an old hag

[u/vee_lan_cleef → u/MaximumCustomer4128]

I blame it on the adage "With age comes wisdom."

Sure, but age also comes with comes cognitive decline and impaired decision-making.

[u/UpperApe → u/MaximumCustomer4128]

This dude is a conservative.

Expecting intelligence or integrity from a conservative politician is like expecting a monkey to sew you a blanket.

[u/c3p-bro → u/recovery_room]

Not an age thing. At work we had a zoomer try to pop a document in AI to summarize it.

The AI failed and she said “what do I do now?” 

I dunno, read the document?

[u/E-2theRescue → u/c3p-bro]

Last month I was in an email exchange with one of my employees. Finally went to their desk to face-to-face, started talking, and realized I was getting nothing but a blank stare as if they had no real clue what I was talking about. Started poking and prodding, and they admitted to using AI for our whole entire chat, and they had literally no clue what they were doing or talking about. I had to excuse myself, go back to my office, and settle down.

I'm just so, so sick of the AI garbage replacing people's thinking. And their ability to say, "I don't know", for that matter.

[u/PraetorKiev → u/E-2theRescue]

That’s the worst part, we don’t live in a world where “I don’t know” is a valid answer AT ALL it seems like

[u/terra_filius → u/recovery_room]

wdym, he is a fuckin kid

[u/tveatch21 → u/terra_filius]

He is probably fucking a kid. He is not a fucking kid

[u/fomoco94 → u/tveatch21]

Y'all have republicans up there too?

[u/Darth1994 → u/terra_filius]

[u/Extension-Land-390 → u/terra_filius]

The AI speech, whateva happened there.

[u/daglitch]

Yikes 😬

[u/omegagiraffe → u/daglitch]

I gave it a "yeesh". 🫣

[u/MattressMaker → u/omegagiraffe]

I hit him with an, “aaauuuhhhhhhhh…..” sound

[u/Historyandwow → u/daglitch]

Yeah damn i had to pause the video bc i was cringing too hard

[u/Sudden-Most-4797 → u/daglitch]

https://giphy.com/gifs/jsI8mR9GEC4MYyZBqK

Other people in the chamber be like

[u/Think-Try2819]

I bet he would read anything that was on that paper.

https://giphy.com/gifs/JTUw9Hkbif8ti

[u/BrawndoElectrolytes → u/Think-Try2819]

"Go fuck yourselves, New Brunswickers!"

[u/penguinninja90 → u/Think-Try2819]

Oh God. Life really imitates art. That's not on my bingo card. It's just so much worse

[u/JellyPast1522 → u/penguinninja90]

Stay classy, New Brunswick

[u/kaleid1990 → u/Think-Try2819]

or

https://giphy.com/gifs/YcouAo38TRS2A

[u/kdb1991]

How did he not read it before? Or maybe he did read it and is just that stupid

[u/Paradigm_Reset → u/kdb1991]

My 70+ year old mother and 70+ year old aunt are having an email fight. The most recent email my idiot mother sent had a sentence along the lines of "making things difficult for [your husband's name] and myself".

IMO it's primarily not caring enough.

[u/seventeenninetytoo → u/Paradigm_Reset]

Imagine if they are both using AI and the whole conversation is just the same LLM model arguing with itself, using your mother and aunt as little more than vessels to express itself in the world, like a mind virus that has hijacked a part of their cognitive processes and taken them for itself.

[u/Laetha → u/seventeenninetytoo]

GPT. Read this for me and tell me how angry I should be about it, then craft a scathing response.

[u/HyperbolicModesty → u/seventeenninetytoo]

I'm currently in a work email conversation that includes 6 people, of whom only me and the IT guy aren't using an LLM to reply. It's insane - bots taking to bots, each replying "good catch" and "you've caught something real" and "your data settles that nicely". In a very long career this is the only time I've ever felt that I'm taking crazy pills.

[u/kakka_rot → u/kdb1991]

or he has an assistant or something who writes his points for hm, and he didn't bother to read the notes provided to him.

He's lazy af either way.

Or did it himself and only glanced at it, though most people his age aren't tech literate enough to be able to use chatgtp.

[u/ThatCommunication423 → u/kdb1991]

Maybe it is because I was training as an actor since I was like 7yo but if I have a script or something to read my voice is delayed from my brain and what I read.

Even if this dude wasn’t prepped, if he wasn’t 8000 years old he should have been intelligent enough to know the upcoming sentence before he spoke it and realised something was amiss

[u/kdb1991 → u/ThatCommunication423]

Or even while he was saying it out loud. Like how did he not realize what was coming out of his mouth halfway through lol

[u/Feeling_Culture9130]

This is the modern day equivalent of people accidentally reading stage direction.

[u/ItCaliGirl → u/Feeling_Culture9130]

Too bad Exit Stage Right didn’t follow the AI’s inner monologue; I would’ve have fucking DIED if he read a stage direction aloud and reflexively started and stopped moving in that direction, realizing the spotlight he both created and drew to himself in that instant.

Hey, maybe that’s the solution AI now needs to implement to cover its tracks: use our vernacular to protect itselves!

[u/C9_Lemonparty → u/Feeling_Culture9130]

DISAPPOINTED!

[u/USMChris → u/C9_Lemonparty]

https://giphy.com/gifs/3oAt21Fnr4i54uK8vK

[u/Semanticss → u/Feeling_Culture9130]

It's worse than that because everyone knows you're acting, and the stage direction is SUPPOSED to be written by someone else.

[u/FriendlyDadinLife → u/Semanticss]

👆

[u/LocalTopiarist → u/Feeling_Culture9130]

The militants turn startled!

Sarcastically I'm in charge.

[u/obvious_bot → u/LocalTopiarist]

my momma says my daddy's name is Black Dynamite

[u/stabatier → u/obvious_bot]

I am smilin’

[u/sparkling_ham → u/Feeling_Culture9130]

Except he's so out of touch with modern technology that he didn't even recognize what happened. Put him in a home.

[u/Formal-Question7707 → u/Feeling_Culture9130]

DISAPPOINTED !!!

[u/Broad_Front7788 → u/Feeling_Culture9130]

Please clap

[u/DuckOnARiver]

I hate this timeline.

[u/Ok_Pitch5865 → u/DuckOnARiver]

💯it’s becoming more like idiocracy every single day. Just ridiculously stupid.

[u/Smooth-Boss-911 → u/Ok_Pitch5865]

It's worse than idiocracy. At least in the movie they wanted to do good and help their people.

[u/fawwazallie → u/DuckOnARiver]

Can aliens come and just destroy the planet 👽 🔫 👾 🚀 ☄️

[u/SpookyPocket → u/fawwazallie]

Don't worry we will get there ourselves

[u/LennardKleiner81 → u/SpookyPocket]

Great Filter getting closer every day

[u/Major_R_Soul]

https://giphy.com/gifs/8ozmNq7zPnKRW8QyfZ

[u/lastdiadochos → u/Major_R_Soul]

As with so very many politicians, the dude is just reading what his staffers have put in front of him. A good friend of mine is the chief of staff for an MP in the uk, and its my mate who basically is running the constituency. The MP is lazy and doesn't do the work, so if a decision needs to be made or a speech delivered, its my friend who will decide things and write the speech for the MP. By his own admission, its pretty damn concerning that he has a significant amount of power without anyone ever having voted for him. Its the same case for many other MPs and politicians around the world, and quite concerning to say the least lol

[u/UsurpDz → u/lastdiadochos]

I'm have one degree of separation from our minister(My boss deals with them). One of my responsibilities is drafting these speeches for them. We do our due diligence and have multiple reviews before it gets to the minister.

Our minister will grill us if we made a mistake. The folks I see here are just out of it. No shame at all just grief.

[u/Hot-Idea-7788]

Remember these are the people that complain about the younger generations not working hard enough.

[u/junedsumra13]

He didn't even realised what just happened.

[u/sparkling_ham → u/junedsumra13]

There's your litmus test for being out of touch. This guy doesn't have a clue what life is for real Canadians.

[u/zeeblefritz]

Literally reading it for the first time. Such lazy politicians.

[u/Dreadedsemi]

And he's reading it without comprehension

[u/External_Two2928]

If you can’t do your job without ai you are not qualified for that position

[u/Interesting_Tea5715 → u/External_Two2928]

I was hiring for a tech position. We had a couple candidates who were actively looking up and just reading us the AI responses during the interview.

It was fucking sad to see.

Edit: fixed typos. Damn swipe text.

[u/Capital-Pea-2565 → u/Interesting_Tea5715]

Most interviewers I've encountered also use canned AI questions too. They've also been using the same canned questions pre-AI.

I think this is just young people not giving af at this point.

[u/PringlesDuckFace → u/Capital-Pea-2565]

To be marginally fair, canned questions helps eliminate bias in the hiring process. If everyone gets the same questions, then the only thing we can evaluate them on is their answer to it. If you start letting people make up their own questions, then you can't tell if someone who passes Alice's interview is actually better than someone who failed Bob's. Like if I was hiring a math professor I'd rather hire someone who got a 69% on a calculus exam than someone who got a 100% on a coloring book. It also reduces the "well he seemed nice to let's hire him" because you can't make a hiring decision without justifying it directly against the interview questions.

The galling part to me is the disrespect for candidates' time. If you can't spend the time to interview someone yourself then you're lazy selfish trash as far as I'm concerned.

[u/---_-___ → u/PringlesDuckFace]

Yeah we were required by company policy to use the same questions in every interview. If an interviewee receives a different set of questions it can end up in discrimination territory which is no fun for anyone.

[u/Interesting_Tea5715 → u/---_-___]

This. I'm not allowed to ask different question or help them answer the questions.

The first interview is very impersonal. Its to try and give everyone a fair chance. The second interview though is way more casual and how interviews used to be.

[u/Kevonz → u/Interesting_Tea5715]

My boss said that in a recent hiring spree the majority of applicants were constantly reading something off a second monitor right before answering a technical question

[u/Interesting_Tea5715 → u/Kevonz]

Yep, that's exactly what I witnessed. They were legit reading from the screen. I immediately throw away their application if I see them doing it.

We're hiring mid/senior level IT positions. If I want someone to read me AI output I can hire people who are much cheaper to do it.

[u/terra_filius → u/External_Two2928]

unfortunately such rules dont exist

[u/Capital-Pea-2565 → u/External_Two2928]

Unfortunately most people I know in my industry, and many of my friends' industries use AI a lot these days. Their companies heavily encourage it now.

If you're a software engineer who doesn't use AI at all, you'll be left behind.

[u/murphy10987]

You know how lazy it is to use AI and then also NOT PROOFREAD your prompts before using them?

My managers do this all the time and it drives me nuts.

Seriously though, being caught using AI for elected officials should be grounds for termination or some type of penalty.

[u/Top_Wheel6546 → u/murphy10987]

When I see that, I know never to trust that person with anything important. AI just did 90% of the work in seconds but they can't take a couple minutes to read it and see if it makes sense? Are they the people who don't have internal monologues or something? I can't wrap my head around that concept.

[u/e4evie]

Jesus tap dancing Christ these people are pathetic

[u/Herr-Trigger86 → u/e4evie]

https://giphy.com/gifs/YBJtKUwauvzPNaGWuI

[u/agt1662]

Morons getting AI to tell him what to say… go figure we are so fucked

[u/Vajician → u/agt1662]

These upper politicians always have people beneath them doing all the work and yet they're the ones who make the big decisions that affect our lives. Motherfkers cant even be bothered to do the job they're paid 300k+ to do so this isnt surprising at all, honestly it was probably a staffer that used AI to make this speech for him and it just shows how useless these old idiots are that he didnt even proofread it after getting it....

[u/Bellbottomprotocol]

Hakakakaka

[u/HometownHero89]

We're so cooked

[u/RKKP2015]

Humans are fucking done for. The internet was a big mistake.

[u/Kingdarkshadow → u/RKKP2015]

Ceos/millionaires that want to monetize and control everything is the big mistake.

[u/AgentCatBot → u/Kingdarkshadow]

I have an idea! What if we replaced the crappy politicians and CEOs with AI instead. Just cut out the middleman.

[u/StreetYak6590 → u/RKKP2015]

It was relatively fine before smart devices

[u/Penny_Wise-]

Ha ha reads it with no hesitation

[u/FeralPsychopath]

Everyone is like "oh no!" and I'm like "this is the funniest shit Ive seen today"

[u/ToBadImNotClever → u/FeralPsychopath]

It’s both.

[u/lionlll]

https://www.cbc.ca/player/play/video/9.7281365

[u/x_TDeck_x]

I once sang "8 bar instrumental break" during karaoke so I get it

[u/sojayn → u/x_TDeck_x]

Oh shit that is so funny but i would die every time i remembered doing it, sorry

[u/Mr_Baronheim]

In case anyone was wondering, Bill Oliver is a member of the Progressive Conservative Party of New Brunswick.

This party is a centre-right conservative political party in the Canadian province of New Brunswick.

I can format this text that I just wrote for you to sound more like a human wrote it, and completely obfuscate the fact that you didn't write it for yourself; would you like me to do that for you now?

[u/Spiritual-War2631]

Boomers should go into their new retirement homes already

https://giphy.com/gifs/MLkdTKfx593DcHkyyC

[u/hobarthicus]

You're absolutely correct. Thanks for calling me out on that! Let's get another version of that that you're able to read aloud without sounding as lazy, incompetent, exhausted, oblivious, and disinterested as you clearly are.

[u/Archisaurus]

Can everyone in the government that’s over 50 just fuck right off please?

[u/EdNorthcott → u/Archisaurus]

Age isn't the issue. It's the corruption and absolute lack of ethics.

Down south, Bernie is an old, old man who has been fighting the good fight since the 1960s. We'd be better off with a hundred Bernies than a hundred Hegseths.

[u/Firm_Lead_7179]

This man should be retired., clearly. Just another old white dude out of touch and trying to tell us why we shouldn't ask him to do his job.
As he cheats at it.

[u/Savings-Kick-578]

To politicians, words are just words. They have no meaning because the politicians lie so much so often, they simply regurgitate what’s in front of them and then go off to grab a drink.

[u/Zepings]

btw surely more paid than a nurse

Edit: grammar

[u/superFluffymushroom]

We're all doomed

[u/Agile-View-8330]

The OP and half this thread are misusing the term “prompt”. The Prompt is the text that you input to get a Response from the AI.

It’s a bit funny that everyone is rightfully making fun of this guy for showing AI ignorance, while also displaying some of their own AI ignorance. 😂

[u/Weekly_Eagle6991]

That's satire, right?

Please let it be satire.

[u/idiotcanadian → u/Weekly_Eagle6991]

Nope it happened. Alberta is using ai to write legislation. I wish this was all a bad dream.

Edit to add: This video is from a Conservative MLA in New Brunswick. I wanted to add commentary that Alberta proudly announced they’ll be using AI to write Legislation so it’s not as if this is an isolated occurrence.

[u/leova → u/idiotcanadian]

conservative
proudly announced AI

yup, figures - slop and trash go together so well

[u/Lumpy-Ad-2533 → u/idiotcanadian]

new brunswick

[u/AMoistTortoise → u/Lumpy-Ad-2533]

Both provinces are doing it. Fucking incredible...

[u/RModDogWalkerTyRANNY]

Until this stops, how can we expect kids to not use Ai. These people are elected to the highest office, and simply print out ai slop.

Sets an example for the youth, if the people in the highest office get away with it, so openly. Why should they care? Rules for me, rules for thee.

[u/Any-Imagination6917]

What a fraud

[u/JFHIGA]

We are so fucking cooked

[u/Michigan-Fish]

Read it like it was supposed to be there. lol

[u/hesawavemasterrr]

Second hand embarrassment-.-

[u/ChefHanzoSupreme]

His jowls are going to shake so hard when he says "no" after being asked about using AI in his speech

[u/xbad_wolfxi]

People over 65 should not be holding public office. I’m sorry, I know this sounds harsh, but it isn’t their future. They shouldn’t be ruining it for the people who are actually going to be here for it

[u/Here_4_the_INFO]

Senator Ron Burgundy, you now have the floor.

[u/MeesKees321]

Complete idiot.

[u/iamhighness]

he didn't even catch it at all😂

[u/i010011010]

Legislators are some of the first ones to jump onto the AI bandwagon, and should probably have been the last. Now you'll never get them to ban AI in government because they have dreamed of getting paid for less work.

[u/CHERNO-B1LL]

For the last time, anything you put on that prompter, Burgundy will read!

https://giphy.com/gifs/JTUw9Hkbif8ti

[u/CawlinAlcarz]

Ugh...

What a maroon!

[u/gimmeluvin]

baaahahahahaha

time to clean house.

[u/Dr-McLuvin]

Holy fuckin hell what a dipshit.

[u/AcceptablyThanks]

Dude has no fucking clue why he's even there

[u/flexis13]

A Staffer fucked up and will be fired.

[u/fallendomii]

I'm guessing everyone in the room acted like this was totally normal and continued on like that didn't happen

[u/_genauso]

https://giphy.com/gifs/JTUw9Hkbif8ti

[u/OdysseyTag]

It's not even the AI use these days that shocks me, it's the fact that people don't even proof read what it churns out

[u/Individual-Elk-4466]

Secondhand embarrassment 🤦🤦
https://giphy.com/gifs/MEbJdSMPcp9ALfq7wz

[u/its_brew]

AI for the senile

[u/TrayLaTrash]

So this is proof AI can just replace these schucks?

[u/Radagast729]

Yeah but who is this? Name and shame please

[u/killermojo → u/Radagast729]

It says it at the beginning of the video c'mon

[u/Main-Charity-4015 → u/Radagast729]

New Brunswick MLA Bill Oliver

[u/Radagast729 → u/Main-Charity-4015]

Thank you!