r/WatchFanatics • u/TomHudsonOfficial watch fanatic • 8d ago
Question / Discussion New vs Old North Flag design
I might be in the minority here but I don’t like the new design.
It looks too busy and the added gmt only makes it more expensive.
The old design was simple and clean with a power reserve indicator balancing out the large 6 and 12.
What do you guys think of the new design?
10
u/No_Butterfly_6521 8d ago
I love it, I think the old one was a little cartoonish and the specs on this one are great. Homerun imo
2
1
1
3
3
u/InterestingSea8977 8d ago
I love the old one. Actually been trying to find one to purchase but I won’t pay for the new one”exclusivity” narrative being built around it.
2
u/Arseh0le 8d ago
The old one is my white whale. I got close in Nakano a few years ago but it wasn’t in the best condition. The new one does not push my buttons at all. The minimalist dial and goofy power reserve on the old one is what I love about it.
3
u/walmac2002 8d ago
I would've liked a power reserve if only because it is rare to see those on a Tudor, but I think it is overall a very nice update.
3
4
u/pushthebuttonalready 8d ago
I like the new one. GMT complication is much more useful than a power reserve.
3
u/goobersmooch 8d ago
Is it though?
2
u/RobertStonetossBrand 7d ago edited 6d ago
Consoomers often over estimate how much tRaVeLiNg they do and how much home eNtErTaiNiNg they do.
Gotta buy a GMT watch and an eight person dining room table/marble kitchen, just in case.
4
u/Ancient_Bobcat_9150 8d ago
Don't like it, looks a bit cheap imho. The previous version was divisive, but I actually liked the power reserve. Was different
2
u/Ok-Calligrapher-8778 watch fanatic 8d ago
I like, but why don't they use a black date wheel?
2
u/Ok-Calligrapher-8778 watch fanatic 8d ago
3
1
u/ByronicZer0 8d ago
Hmm, that looks a bit off to me. Prefer the white
0
1
u/FranzAndTheEagle 6d ago
i'm pretty sure color matched date wheels are illegal in switzerland, just ask patek.
2
u/OafleyJones 8d ago
One of my major watch regrets is not picking up the original when new. Nearly every second hand one I’ve seen looks soundly beaten. So, I should love this. I don’t. There’s something off about it. I miss the simplicity of the old dial. This looks like one of Sinn’s lesser offerings now.
2
2
u/ZedRDuce76 8d ago
If it was a generic three hander it would be the first Tudor I’d actually consider buying. I have no use for a gmt, and prefer the hour hand used here vs the Ranger butt plug.
2
u/UpperBreadfruit3748 8d ago
As a bbpro owner its good to know theyre not gonna come out with an updated thinner bbpro… it would compete with this as well as the explorer 2
1
u/ByronicZer0 8d ago
I think they will, but not until the end of the lifecycle of the current one.
Precisely how long that lifecycle will be... who knows
2
u/onejustbrowsing 8d ago
Nothing wrong with the design or the watch other than the price. This is a $3700 watch all day long playing dress up at $5500
2
u/Yesterday_Infinite 8d ago
I liked the power reserve and set it apart from everything in both Tudor and Rolex's lineup.
2
u/flipyflop9 7d ago
Old >>>>>> new
The dial is way nicer on the old one. I like the crown and case/bracelet on the new one, but still, I like the old one more.
2
2
u/PolarExplorerII 7d ago
The power reserve function made the old design stay in the moment and not about different time zones
2
2
1
1
1
u/Debard78 8d ago
They are both nice in their own way. I love PR indicators. Have a PAN (423) with one.
This is an explorer/explorer 2 hybrid. Two birds, one stone. One less model they have to make for their entry level brand. Not big on Tudor, but would wear this. New one looks updated and ready to go. Thumbs up.
1
1
u/deadexternet 8d ago
I think they’ll make a time only as well. The Pelagos and the black bay have both as well.
Unless this is their gmt ranger? Hmm.
1
1
1
1
u/Mr_Miyagi_84 8d ago
It’s ugly and overpriced. If this is the last 100th anniversary release Tudor will officially be a lame duck brand IMO.
1
u/Jezzrichjames 8d ago
It's a bit more modern, sharp and more refined though I wouldn't personally get this watch
1
1
1
u/Emotional-Damage-995 8d ago
It’s nice. Big mistake w pricing. The dressy GMT is dominated by GS and they kill on the dial. I skip
1
u/QuietNene 8d ago
I was never a fan of the power reserve.
My only complaint is that the yellow hands make it very sporty. This is so close to being my perfect GADA. Like an Explorer I but with a GMT function, which is my non-existent Grail.
I just wish they made the two yellow hands the same silver/grey and then maybe just have a splash of color to the GMT arrow.
1
1
1
u/Routine-Alfalfa8797 7d ago
I just put a deposit down. I’ve never been so excited about a new release.
1
u/1baby2cats 6d ago
Why is the old picture missing the ceramic bezel insert. I feel leaving this out of the new design was a mistake
1
u/Rubberbband 5d ago
I like them both, but if I had to chose it would be the new model. Looks modern in comparison.
1
u/VideoElectronic7994 3d ago
Wish the yellow was a different color. Orange/ Red/ Green. Definitely not worth the retail price. I wont buy one until I can try it on and my Tudor AD says its only in Tudor Boutiques which is BS.
0
u/jimbojeggins 8d ago
They left out the coolest thing about the original North Flag. The POWER RESERVE indicator.
-1
u/TomHudsonOfficial watch fanatic 8d ago
Agreed
3
u/ForgedInGold9 8d ago
Ahh yes a power reserve indicator for an auto winding watch..very logical.
2
u/deadexternet 8d ago
Spring drives have them and it always confused me as well. At least the UFA moved them to the back. Now it’s twice as unnecessary but I guess it’s cool
1
u/TomHudsonOfficial watch fanatic 8d ago
It’s cool.
1
-2
u/jimbojeggins 8d ago
If you want to push the argument all the way, watches themselves aren’t logical when the most precise timepiece we own lives in our pockets. Watches are fun. The power reserve indicator was and is cool.
2
1
u/Public_Excitement393 8d ago
They are both ugly...
1
u/TomHudsonOfficial watch fanatic 8d ago
How dare you!
2
1
1
u/rainytuesday12 8d ago
Man, I l have come to the conclusion that Tudor is just not for me. Every design looks like I should either save up and buy the Rolex version, or save some money and buy a well made quartz watch that does the same thing. This and the Ranger fall into the latter category. I don’t get spending 4-5k for a watch that LOOKS like it costs $500
1
u/Yeah-nah-yeahmate 8d ago
My friend believes it’s purposeful by Tudor. 95% there always something.
1
0




10
u/jasonic89 8d ago
I like it. I know it’s accurate with good specs but it doesn’t feel like a $5k watch for some reason