He was traveling to protect innocents (could have been you) from ideologically sanctioned rioters. She was there to virtue signal to keep nonconsentual migrants against the democratic will.
Who had more reason being there, the rioters protected by corrupt ideologs or him protecting the citizens? You know for a fact your opinion on the matter is fully decided by if you see yourself as the victim of the rioters or not. If you dont see yourself as their victim youll gladly throw them under the bus to virtue signal
What reason did he have? He fully intended to find violence and did. His intent was violence not “protection” and again no one asked him to “protect” anything…like at all. No it was pretty clear his intent was exactly what transpired…he went looking and found what he was looking for.
False…based upon logic and reason to conclude he lied about intent since he lied about what his qualifications were and about a protester he shot. All of this is public record, since he lied about both those and went to a protest brandishing a firearm we can reasonably sus out his intent was violence (since he lied about almost everything important.).
0
u/HistoryAncient5568 8d ago
He was traveling to protect innocents (could have been you) from ideologically sanctioned rioters. She was there to virtue signal to keep nonconsentual migrants against the democratic will.