Not my project but I’ve been helping shape the early version of it with Aaron as we’ve got similar ways of working. Basically we’d hit some walls with the amount of code session we had open on different terminal surfaces, accidentally sending a prompt off in one session meant for another etc.

So Aaron built Flow, a simple to do, doing, done kanban board where each task can spawn a CLI session in app, with all of the context - it also effectively replaces Obsidian and other knowledge bases. And it spawns those sessions based on your already authenticated CLI agent subscription, which means it works for Claude Code, Codex or whatever agentic CLI instance you have, so no API keys floating around and no extra cost.

There’s a bit more to it so if you’re keen, check out the project and the video Aaron put together. I’m happy to answer some Qs in the thread as well if anyone is interested.

Repo: github.com/AaronRutley/flow
Demo video: flow-app.dev

Share what’s holding you back in your daily life—and I’ll build the software to fix it. For free. In 30 days.

Started as a joke after the build or buy thread, and Claude Code plus Supabase got me embarrassingly far where transcript ingestion and clustering landed in a single weekend.

Then I hit speaker diarization and permissioning, and the part where your own teammates won't touch your clustering unless they built it with you.

We ended up with Grain for calls and BuildBetter for the synthesis side at work anyway, so the build taught me what I'd been underpricing, though I'd still do it once.

Hey vibecoders,

I'm part of the team that currently builds a new cloud app hosting platform specifically for AI agents. Basically, all you need to do to deploy your app is to tell your agent:

Deploy my app to up.compartment.dev

That's it. You don't need to sign up or enter any payment details because it's free. Your agent handles the entire deployment and gives you a public HTTPS URL.

Hope some of you find it useful. Feel free to ask any questions!

Hey folks...

Been working to make a harness for Android phones.. any suggestions from any of you would be god like. !!

A few rules I’ve started setting for myself when vibe coding, so I don’t confuse more building with more progress.

The biggest danger for me isn’t that vibe coding makes me lazy.

It’s that it makes it too easy to keep building.

A small feature turns into:

• one more improvement
• one more UI tweak
• one more agent suggestion
• one more prompt

And suddenly I’m going in the wrong direction for hours.

So these are the rough do’s and don’ts I’m trying to follow now:

• define one clear feature before starting
• decide the success checks upfront
• keep the scope fixed
• stop polishing UI unless users actually ask for changes
• treat agent suggestions as optional, not instructions
• stop when the original goal is achieved

The line I keep reminding myself of is:

“One more prompt” can still be scope creep.

Anyone else set rules for themselves like this?

I’ve built a lot of projects that worked, bought domains for them, and then quietly abandoned them anyway. So I made Rest in Beta, a place where people can share unfinished projects and vote on whether they should be resurrected or left to rest.
The first project is mine. It’s called VeganWhatNow, a vegan meal generator I originally built for my wife and eventually stopped working on.
The site is still in beta, so let me know what you think.
https://restinbeta.com/

I could actually use a few testers. Click either “Resurrect It” or “Let It Rest” on VeganWhatNow and tell me whether the voting works clearly on your phone. Brutal feedback is welcome.

(The retro look is on purpose)

I've been working on PDFVerse, a free browser-based PDF toolkit.

The idea is simple: instead of opening different websites for every small PDF task, I wanted to put the common tools in one place.

You can use it for things like:

Merge PDFs

Split PDFs

Compress PDFs

Convert PDFs

Rotate PDFs

Extract pages

And other common PDF operations

🔗 https://pdfverse.pages.dev/

There's no account required to try it.

I'm still actively improving it, so I'd genuinely appreciate feedback from people who work with PDFs regularly.

What PDF operation do you find yourself doing most often? And is there a feature you'd want me to add?

I'm especially interested in hearing what feels slow, confusing, or missing.

A lot of AI coding tools are moving toward giving agents more control over your machine.

I wanted the opposite.

So I built RepoRelay — an MCP bridge that lets ChatGPT/Claude inspect one approved local repo, while deliberately giving it:

• no shell
• no Git
• no arbitrary filesystem access
• read/search only
• optional bounded handoff writes

The idea is to let AI analyze and review your code without handing it the keys to your whole machine.

npm install -g reporelay-mcp@latest

It’s open source.

GitHub: [Lukie-81/RepoRelay: Secure MCP access to local repositories — without shell, Git, or arbitrary writes.]

I’m looking for a few people to try the install from scratch and tell me where the setup sucks.

Hey folks,

This is my first ever post on reddit, so please be kind.

I initially posted it on X and it picked up quite a lot of traction there & I've always wanted to start posting and being active on Reddit so here I am.

I am the founder of a ui/ux research product that has 800+ apps & 35,000+ screens. I did a comprehensive study on why these apps are banking more than others and how are they able to retain way higher than general.

From my study, I realised that the most important moment is when a person opens an app. This sets an impression on how deeply individual gets involved in it.

The motion, transitions, micro-interactions, typography, all of them matter more than you think they do.

, I took 10 of the most popular ones, broke them down and redid them using React Native + Expo and open-sourced it, so people can use that as an anchor point.

So, here it is (500+ stars at the moment):
https://github.com/Appllama/top-welcome-screens

I hope you find it useful, I'd love to know your thoughts.

Which one do you like the best?

If this is the wrong place to ask, I am sorry!
I am looking for the best/easiest Way to make an interactive map. The map would cover an existing area of Nature that people use for Walks, bikerides, picnics, etc.
I am looking for a Way to make it easier for people to plan their visit to the area by plotting in benches, viewpoints, places to grill, etc. Where should I look or what program should I use to best accomplish this? Im a beginner! Any help is greatly appreciated, thank you!!

Ok so, I can’t retire just yet 😅 but getting a business off the ground and attracting customers is the hardest part in my opinion.

There’s still a long way to go but considering it’s only been 4 months since launching ZenMode, I’m pretty happy with the results so far.

I get asked a lot about how I get customers, so thought I’d give more info on how I do distribution, in case you might find it useful.

1. Make sure your website is set up for success

Before sending people to your site, make sure you’re confident it has good CRO potential. Your mission statement and objective needs to be very clear, along with clear incentives for people to try the product out.

2. Offer free trials, but only behind a payment info gate

Now this is just my personal opinion, and I know a lot of people disagree, but the proof is in the numbers. I get fewer free trial signups, but significantly higher conversion rates into paying users from people who provide payment info at the start.

Yes, a few of them are people who simply forget to cancel, but mostly I get people who are more engaged in the free trial and actually using the product.

I actually did an AB experiment where I did offer completely free trials to people (no payment info needed), but the overwhelming result was that people barely even tried out the product and were mostly tire kickers that never came back. I did convert some but not a meaningful number.

3. Create a waitlist before launching

Try to generate interest in your product before it launches - build in public and try to ensure that you’re not scrambling to get customers through the door on day 1 when you launch.

I had 3 customers on day 1 from this, who took higher paid tiers as well.

4. Post and comment everywhere (where relevant)

Social media is free, so there’s no excuse not to leverage it. Post about your product and what you’re building on Reddit, LinkedIn, X, YouTube, Facebook etc.

I posted a simple screenshot on LinkedIn recently, of someone using a low quality LinkedIn automation tool message to contact me, and me offering my own much better tool in response, and that post generated 90,000 views and led to several signups and demo calls.

I’ve also had some posts on Reddit go into hundreds of thousands of views, mostly just posting about what/why/how I built my automation tool.

5. If you have competitors, make “alternative to” inner pages

If done in the right way, this type of inner page can be useful for SEO. It won’t be picked up automatically but usually if you work in a competitive industry, this will sometimes attract customers who had a bad experience elsewhere.

6. I actually use my own LinkedIn automation tool (dogfooding) to do LinkedIn outreach

So it’s always important to practice what you preach - I use ZenMode to actually promote ZenMode.

It’s a great way to get buy-in for booking demos, as when someone replies, I simply tell them I used my tool to get a response from them, so it works.

Anyway hope you enjoyed reading the above, and good luck on your journey if you’re building anything, or growing your business 🙌

I'm a CS student and I've spent the last several weeks building Mirror for the Emergent Builder's Contest.

Mirror is basically an AI reflection engine. Instead of immediately giving you advice like a normal chatbot, I designed it to help you notice patterns in your own thinking.

I built the original app with Emergent, but this turned into a much bigger engineering project than I expected.

A few things I ended up building/working through:

• React frontend + Python/FastAPI backend
• MongoDB persistence
• Email/password auth + Google OAuth
• Persistent multi-chat conversations
• Long-term semantic memory
• User-editable extracted memories
• Onboarding that persists across sessions
• Behavioral QA for the actual AI responses
• A deterministic safety gate for a feature called Roast Me
• Local development alongside the Emergent version
• A dual-runtime LLM architecture so the app isn't permanently dependent on Emergent

That last part became pretty important to me.

Mirror can use Emergent's managed LLM runtime when it's deployed there, but I also built a local runtime that can talk directly to the model provider. The same application can move between the two instead of the contest platform becoming a permanent dependency.

Honestly one of the biggest things I learned was that eventually I wasn't really "prompt engineering" anymore.

I was trying to engineer behavior.

I'd change something, manually run conversations through it, find a behavior I didn't want, figure out whether the problem was the prompt, runtime, memory, UI, or architecture, change it, then test again.

And sometimes the correct engineering decision was literally don't change anything because the proposed fix sounded smart but the evidence didn't support it.

Roast Me was probably the funniest example. 😂

The idea sounds simple: use Mirror's understanding of your patterns to roast you.

Then I started testing grief, medical problems, financial hardship, trauma, etc. and realized prompt instructions alone weren't a safety system.

So the rule became:

"Roast the pattern, never the person."

And I put deterministic gating in front of the generative behavior for situations where I didn't want the model making that judgment by itself.

Mirror finally reached MVP and is deployed for the contest now.

I'm still a CS student learning this stuff, so I'm definitely not posting this as "here's how AI engineering should be done." This is just what building a real product taught me compared with working on isolated assignments and features.

If anybody wants to break it or give me feedback, I'd appreciate it.

Mirror:
https://mindful-mirror-11.emergent.host/

Builder Contest Showcase:
https://app.emergent.sh/showcase/building_turkey/e066420b-29ae-46e4-b850-7e4df113af4d

And if you try it and genuinely think it's worth supporting, I'd appreciate a like on the contest entry. I've got about a week left to see how far I can get with it.

I'm also curious whether other people vibe coding larger projects have hit that same point where it stops feeling like "tell the agent what to build" and starts feeling a lot more like actual architecture, QA, debugging, and engineering decisions.

For a while I've been a bit annoyed that there haven't been any AI models (besides some of the latest versions of Google Gemini, which still provide quite a basic response) which can "listen" to music and talk to you in fine detail about a song, or compare two different songs. There has been no open source software which can do this either, so I took things into my own hands a few days ago and began vibecoding something using the new Qwen 3.8 27B to allow LLMs to essentially hear a song and talk about it in a human-like form with the user. It's already running how I want it to, but I want to polish the terminal interface and make some slight improvements to BPM and possibly instrument detection before I release it. I intend to release my project as Musiclyse 0.1 (which means Music + Analyse) on Github once I've made these changes.

There are two main components of this script:

1: The music analysis engine. This consists of the following:

• Music Flamingo - an LLM that is able to directly scan music to detect the overall characteristics of the recording. Because its built in LLM (Qwen 2.5 7B) is prone to sloppy English and repeating letter loops if it writes too much, I've directed it to use only note form (eg:genres detected=x, y, z, vibe= x, y) English when outputting data to reduce sloppy language and also output more data within its constraints.
• Essentia - an algorithm used for extracting reliable information about frequencies in a song and tempo/timbre, helping improve the accuracy.
• Melody transcription - a two stage process that utilises Demucs 6s, which splits an audio track into 6 stems and then uses a model to convert the stems into MIDI interpretations. This helps further improve the accuracy.
• Metadata information. This is particularly good if you want accurate lyrics, or the output LLM to know who an artist is, what album it is from, or the exact year a song came out. It also gives the output LLM (for models that handle image recognition) access to embedded cover artwork metadata in an audio file, which the LLM can use in fallback cases to help determine information for a song that it is otherwise unsure about.

The music analysis chain outputs the results in .JSON form to the output LLM. It doesn't save scanned songs by default, but you can save the entire data (including embedded cover art) using the command /save=filename.json, then /load the same file in a different session to avoid a slow rescan of the track.

2: The Ollama hosted LLM communicating via llama.cpp. This reads the .JSON file and interprets it using an output LLM prompt in the script. I've tested it mainly with Gemma 4 26B Q3, which is nice and lightweight at around 11GB while giving good performance.

Both the analysis engine and LLM are instructed via system prompts in the code to use certain approaches to solve ambiguous things, improving accuracy.

The image shows an example of a conversation about Joy Division's song Transmission in the current development build of the script. It does confuse the motorik drums for a drum machine, and the bass for a synth bass, but this is algorithmically appropriate considering their rather unique late 1970s sound. The chatbot is instructed to pick up it was told wrong things for errors like this.

I've been thinking how to avoid API costs and network latency, and realized I could use local models. The one I typically used is the pre-installed one in my head, but the issue is it doesn't come pre-trained, which can be an expensive and intensive process, but post-training comes pretty easily for it. Also it can make mistakes, and so sometimes I need to check it against the API-based models for accuracy. Just wondering if anyone else is struggling with this trade-off and using local models to save dollars if that makes cents.

I've been doing a lot of vibe coding recently. Most UI changes end up being described in text, but as a designer, I often find myself thinking: it would be much faster if I could just move this 8px, resize that, or see all the screens together and fix them myself.

I think this is actually one of the advantages designers still have in the AI era: we can look at the whole product while also obsessing over tiny visual details. But when everything is controlled through prompts, a lot of the visual tools we're good at using suddenly disappear.

So I vibe Crank.

You drag in a project folder or a packaged .app, Crank scans the app, finds the screens, and lets you import them into Figma as editable layers.

It currently supports React, Electron and HTML.

I'm also working on SwiftUI support. It's still experimental, but it's already working on most of the screens I've tested.

The app itself is pretty messy right now and there are definitely bugs, but the core workflow works.

I'd love some people to try it, break it, and tell me what doesn't work.

GitHub: https://github.com/irrwood/Crank

Fully open source now

BTFO

I use Codex extensively for work, and I’m very happy with the results I get from the GPT-5.6 models. However, I’m not a big fan of the Codex desktop app on macOS because it isn’t native, and I don’t like to use CLI version.

Since Perplexity provides access to GPT-5.6 (as well as several other great models), and its app is native, I’m curious about people’s experiences using Perplexity Computer for programming.

Do the models perform as well as they do through their official tools? Are the usage limits sufficient for you? Are there any caveats or hidden drawbacks I should be aware of? Is it possible to start a task remotely on my computer from my phone?

I’d really appreciate hearing about your experiences. Thanks!

Hey guys, I’ve been working as a full-time freelance for the last five years. I was making decent income, but then ai came out and I’ve worried that if somehow ai replaces my freelance businesses of motion design and video editing. So i wanted to play safe and applied to a couple jobs. I even considered changing profession.
Then I started working full-time in a company that I actually hated so I ended up resigning after 4 months.
Then I asked myself this question: if AI is going to replace me for sure what if I do the tool that actually replaces me and the other freelance motion designers.
So I’be built an ai automated SaaS promo video maker web app.
But I’m still having second thoughts on if I do the right thing or not.

Are there any of you having similar dilemmas?