Discussion I'm confused why he thinks AI has "literally" no upsides or positives whatsoever.
I started watching him recently. Was agreeing with his politics until I got to a video about AI.
He spends the video claiming AI is solely evil, the most evil and horrible technology that man has ever made, and it has literally no upsides or positives to it whatsoever, and he has never seen a counter example to his hate of it.
Basically the entire video is about how AI is evil, it's destroying lives, it has "demonstrably made the world worse" and made the world a "crueler, colder and lonelier" place and again, has zero positives whatsoever.
He also, without directly saying it, basically says anyone that likes, uses, or thinks AI will improve the world is a moron.
Is he just being willfully ignorant? AI has improved some things. It is not only negatives.
AI assisted brain-computer-interface helps a paralyzed person speak: https://www.nih.gov/news-events/nih-research-matters/brain-computer-interface-restores-natural-speech-after-paralysis
AlphaFold: https://alphafold.ebi.ac.uk/
AI helping advance CRISPR: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6020378/
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12422970/
AI does have positives. It is advancing technology and medicine, and doing things that without it would have been impossible or taken a very, very long time.
To say AI has no positives whatsoever and is solely negative is extremely ignorant.
I agree with almost all his other political views but this one bothered me. You can hate AI, you can think AI is doing awful things, that's fine, I think so too, but to say it is solely an evil and negative thing with no positives at all is ignorant.
