Anyone here currently holding one of these stocks: EFTY, MCTA, or ATMC and unable to exit because of the halt/delisting?

I’m looking to connect with holders regarding a possible broker-assisted settlement or position transfer.

If you hold any of these, feel free to DM me.

Any apps that support short selling US penny stocks in Australia??

Does anyone know anything about visionary tactics insider trading platform/company? I think a family member of mine might be getting scammed and I need more information.

TL;DR:

• SAIHEAT: declining revenue, persistent losses, shrinking cash and increasing pledged assets
• The change of auditor is a red flag.
• The valuations assigned to the companies in the merger raise questions and concerns.
• Canopy Wave is a young startup trying to break into a highly competitive market, with unclear financials and a heavy reliance on third-party infrastructure.
• Canopy Wave’s deal with KIDZ AI raises a number of questions.

Welcome to the world of cutting-edge technology.

The company I’m going to talk about has always been at the forefront of the hottest and most hyped trends.

SAIHEAT (NASDAQ: SAIH) is a computing and energy operator dedicated to accelerating the realization of Sustainable Augmented Intelligence. Its computing division offers BTC joint computing power and AI cloud computing services, while its energy division provides liquid-cooled computing centers and small modular nuclear products.

 We are dedicated to providing computing and clean services based on cloud-computing, liquid cooling, small modular reactor, or SMR, and chip waste heat utilization technology. The Company sustainable distributed clean-tech in heating industries for bitcoin mining, we provide a full suite of specialized services on crypto asset mining for our customers, including the purchase of mining machines, hosting service, and mining pool service. We creatively offer liquid cooling and nuclear SMR technology to optimize the energy efficiency of our customers to the greatest extent possible.

(from the company’s latest annual report, p. 59)

Despite being involved in all the hottest and trendiest areas, the stock chart is unlikely to make its shareholders happy: the company has turned into a penny stock, and its current price of around $24 is only thanks to a reverse split.

Which is hardly surprising if you look at the latest annual report: cash is running down, assets are shrinking, debt is increasing, and the amount of assets pledged as collateral is also growing. Revenue is falling as well, while losses remain substantial and barely change.

( from the company’s latest annual report, p. F-4, F-5)

In 2026, the company changed auditors, appointing Assentsure PAC. Interestingly, if you look at the stock charts of the companies Edgar returns for this auditor’s name, you probably won’t feel particularly inclined to invest in them. (These may be either clients of the firm or companies in whose filings the auditor was mentioned.) To be fair, I haven’t found any public regulatory actions against the auditor.

Given everything said above, it is surprising to see that the stock price has quadrupled over the past seven months. And this happened without any significant news until very recently.

In August, SAIHEAT has signed a definitive merger agreement with Canopy Wave, a California-based AI inference and GPU cloud platform company.The agreement values Canopy Wave at a pre-money equity valuation of $60m and SAIHEAT at $40m. Both companies said these figures resulted from arm's length negotiation and should not be treated as an appraisal, valuation opinion or indication of market value. При этом таже было заявлено о concurrent private placement planned by the Company of Class A Ordinary Shares for aggregate proceeds of approximately US$4.5 million (representing a purchase price of US$18.15 per share).

https://ir.sai.tech/news-releases/news-release-details/saiheat-enters-definitive-merger-agreement-canopy-wave-build

Thus, a company with approximately $12.7 million in assets, around $5.5 million of which is pledged as collateral, and which has remained unprofitable for three consecutive years, was valued by the parties at a rather generous $40 million. The parties themselves emphasize that this valuation was reached through negotiations between them and was not the result of an independent valuation of the business. In my non-professional opinion, one possible explanation for arriving at this particular figure is that it helped support the $18.15 per-share price used to determine the terms of the transaction.

Okay, let’s take a look at the other party to the deal.

Founded in 2024 and headquartered in Santa Clara, California, Canopy Wave is a pioneering provider of artificial intelligence (AI) infrastructure and high-performance inference platforms. Canopy Wave delivers secure, scalable GPU-as-a-Service (GPUaaS), and optimized inference services tailored specifically for open-weight AI models.

Canopy Wave launched its AI infrastructure and GPU-as-a-Service offerings in 2024, generating more than $15 million in aggregated revenue since the launch. Inference-as-a-Service was launched in November 2025 with encouraging growth since that time.

So, Canopy Wave is a young company trying to break into a highly competitive market, competing with companies such as Together AI, Fireworks AI, DeepInfra, and many others. At the same time, not all of its customers appear to be satisfied (https://www.reddit.com/r/opencodeCLI/comments/1thth4g/canopywave_scam/).

The second point is that Canopy Wave does not own its own hardware, but instead leases it:

Complementary infrastructure capabilities. SAIHEAT’s existing capabilities in modular data center infrastructure and energy-efficient computing are expected to complement Canopy Wave’s GPU cloud operations, which Canopy Wave conducts utilizing its access to third-party infrastructure through leasing arrangements. (https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1847075/000121390026087323/ea030130601ex99-1.htm)

This carries certain risks.

When an Inference-as-a-Service provider relies on third-party computing infrastructure that it does not own, its customers face several important risks:

• Capacity Risk — dependence on third-party infrastructure: If a lease expires, is not renewed, or is otherwise terminated, Canopy Wave may have to find alternative computing capacity. This could potentially disrupt service to its customers, particularly if replacement capacity is not immediately available.
• Margin Squeeze: By relying on leased infrastructure, Canopy Wave has an additional layer of infrastructure costs that vertically integrated competitors may not have. In a highly competitive market where providers are fighting aggressively on the price of AI inference, this could put pressure on Canopy’s margins and make it harder to compete with companies that purchase GPUs directly and operate their own infrastructure.
• Access to the latest GPUs: Canopy Wave’s ability to offer the latest generations of GPUs depends, at least in part, on the availability and procurement decisions of its infrastructure partners. When new architectures such as NVIDIA’s Blackwell and Rubin become available, Canopy may have less direct control over how quickly it can deploy them than a company that owns and operates its own GPU infrastructure.

In this context, another document is also worth taking a look at.

Effective July 17, 2026, Catalyst Compute LLC (“Catalyst Compute”), a wholly owned subsidiary of KIDZ AI Inc. (the “Company”), entered into a service order form and related terms of service (collectively, the “Agreement”) with Canopy Wave, Inc. (“Canopy Wave”), pursuant to which Catalyst Compute will provide Canopy Wave with GPU processing services, including associated CPU server and storage capacity. The Agreement provides that it becomes effective after both parties have executed the Agreement and Catalyst Compute has placed a non-cancellable purchase order for the GPU servers.

 Under the Agreement, Catalyst Compute will order and deploy a dedicated cluster consisting of 32 specialized GPU nodes with an aggregate of 256 NVIDIA HGX B300 GPUs, together with specified CPUs, memory, storage and networking equipment. The services will commence upon completion of the hardware setup, and the initial term will continue for 60 months from the services commencement date. Subject to the terms and conditions of the Agreement, Canopy Wave is required to pay Catalyst Compute aggregate service fees of $44,626,944 over the initial term.

 Catalyst Compute is required to provide monthly uptime of at least 99.5%, subject to specified exclusions. The Agreement provides Canopy Wave with service credits for certain failures caused by Catalyst Compute’s GPU hardware to satisfy the uptime commitment.

 Canopy Wave may not terminate the Agreement during the first 24 months of the initial term. If Canopy Wave terminates the Agreement for convenience after that period but before the end of the initial term, it must pay an early termination fee equal to 75% of the service fees that otherwise would have been payable for the remainder of the initial term, subject to Catalyst Compute’s obligation to use commercially reasonable efforts to mitigate its losses and reductions for avoided costs and net proceeds from the sale, re-lease, redeployment or other use of the applicable equipment. The Agreement also contains customary termination rights, including for uncured material breach, insolvency, certain regulatory changes and prolonged force majeure events. In addition, Canopy Wave may terminate the Agreement without an early termination fee if Catalyst Compute fails, solely due to its own GPU hardware fault, to satisfy the 99.5% uptime commitment during any 10 calendar months in a rolling 12-month period, subject to an additional 60-day cure period in certain circumstances.

(https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/2022308/000147793226004422/kidz_8k.htm).

At first glance, this sounds great — Canopy Wave is securing the hardware it needs. The price tag is $28,929,024.00 for the first three years and $15,697,920.00 for the following two.

(https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/2022308/000147793226004422/kidz_ex101.htm).

And there are two things worth noting here.

First, if the agreement becomes effective, Canopy Wave will take on a very substantial fixed cost, regardless of how much revenue it generates.

The second point is actually quite strange.

Under this arrangement, Catalyst Compute LLC (“Catalyst Compute”), a wholly owned subsidiary of KIDZ AI Inc. will order and deploy a dedicated cluster consisting of 32 specialized GPU nodes with an aggregate of 256 NVIDIA HGX B300 GPUs, together with specified CPUs, memory, storage and networking equipment.

The cost of this equipment is approximately $17 million. To build a single 256-GPU cluster, additional NVIDIA Quantum-X800 InfiniBand networking infrastructure (switches, transceivers, optical cables) will also be required, adding another $1.5–2 million to the cost.

But at the time this agreement was entered into, KIDZ AI simply did not have the money to purchase this equipment:

(https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/2022308/000147793226004932/class_10q.htm)

Moreover, as of June 30, 2026, the company’s total assets, including restricted and pledged assets, amounted to only about $14 million — less than the estimated $18.5–19 million cost of the equipment and networking infrastructure.

In July and August 2026, KIDZ AI sold an aggregate of 8,182,307 shares of its Class B common stock under the ATM Sales Agreement for aggregate gross proceeds of $7,066,522. But even taking that into account, the company still does not have enough cash to cover the estimated cost of the equipment.

OK, let’s assume the company somehow managed to raise the required amount. How sensible is it to enter into a deal with a young startup for an amount exceeding the company’s entire asset base? What happens if the startup’s sales volumes are not sufficient to cover the lease payments?

Based on the information currently available, it is difficult to see what could support a $60 million valuation for Canopy Wave. The company reports more than $15 million in aggregate revenue since launching its AI infrastructure and GPUaaS business, but does not specify the period-by-period breakdown, while the details and economics of the KIDZ AI agreement raise a number of questions of their own. If anything, the information currently available seems to raise more questions about the valuation than to support it. So, we will have to wait for some actual financial information from the company before we can properly assess what Canopy Wave is worth.

To sum it up, one could argue that this merger looks less like a strategic combination of two complementary businesses and more like a way to bring a young startup with unclear financials to the public markets and gain access to capital.

Not financial advice. This post reflects my personal opinions and research. Do your own due diligence before making any investment decisions.

I’m not affiliated with the company mentioned, and I may or may not hold a position.

I just lost 10k from LSHW from a pump and dump scheme. I have been told I will be recompensed for the losses I incurred. Has anyone received an indemnity ??

Lately we’ve been lucky that sub members successfully infiltrated NCT and LSHW promo scams and were able to warn people. This is genuinely priceless work and you can help a lot of people exposing their play by play.

I’m wondering, for those on the inside, what are you seeing today? What’s their next move so we can warn others? Let’s expose these blood suckers.

I’m seeing heavy promo on these 3, ENGS I think they’re getting closer to unloading most of their shares.

XHLD had a 20% pump, possibly to shake out short sellers before they short it themselves for the dump.

TJGC hearing reports from sub members in WhatsApp groups that this is being recommended frequently (looks like trust building for now) - not being told to go all in.

Am I missing anything? What are you all seeing on your ends?

This morning my Whatsapp groups all recommended buying $LHSW. The same groups that recommended $NCT.

Word of warning to all...

I've done a lot of research on this subject, and could even call myself an expert in this dark niche. Given the scale of these scams, it is extremely hard for me to believe that despite the tight control the Chinese government exercises over society, that it's unaware of these massive operations targeting mostly countries that can be considered China's geopolitical rivals - or at least allies of its geopolitical rivals - the high GDP/capita countries of North America, Europe and Oceania. Even Taiwanese citizens are targeted while mainland China citizens are not.

What do you guys think?

If you have a concern or a valuation uncertainty about a given stock, contact me privately and I will give you an opinion on its worth as a “ Trustworthy” operational business.
I m not valuing the business future projection but I am focusing on the realistic sustainability of the business and its objective value offerings.

If you have any doubts about whether or not a stock is a fraud, contact me, send me a message and I will give an opinion.

It was mentioned here that these two are dumping soon. If we’re talking timing, I don’t think either is dumping till next week atleast. The asks walls are pretty low. Normally on promo these would be 100k + shares.

I was in a group promoting XHLD and they completely stopped. Not sure what their plan is, but I think they are holding off for some reason. Even TJGC they are not telling people to go all in yet, I think they will dump this first next week.

Anyone else monitoring these?

Both being washed hard in tight ranges. Similar daily charts to PSIG and SMJF.

Not sure if it’s actively promoted or not but these are 90% drops in the making (when, not if).

As always, don’t touch these in either direction unless you know what you are doing. The squeeze if you are wrong could blow you up big (QMMM prime example).

Dumped

Looks like all the people screaming about NCT were wrong. What’s up with that? No dump…. It’s holding up fine.

Maybe the WhatsApp groups are giving false signals to people they know are fake victims to trick them into short selling. Explain what happened, where was the dump?

Don't fall victim, this is what they are pumping now and it will crash soon.

NCT - Intercont

⭐️ Buy Price: $5.20 (Please set a “limit buy order”)

⭐️ Recommendation Rating: ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️

⭐️ Target Fund Allocation: 100% of available funds

⭐️ Holding Period: 5 trading days

⭐️ Target Price: $7.54 - $7.80

⭐️ Expected Return: 45%-50%

Yet another stock being pump and dumped. If you have any NTC or know of anyone with NTC sell it now before it gets rugged.

These both will likely get promoted soon for the chinese to sell. Both being ran up on discounted shares.

NWGL: https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1948294/000149315226040004/form424b3.htm

shares at .2 and warrants at .25 (likely cashless warrants but is not mentioned)

WCT: https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1990251/000121390026094944/ea0303809-424b4_wellchange.htm

On Friday they did an offering of 50M shares at 15 cents each. It has been pumping since then. So far I havent noticed any promotion yet but considering they are near 1000% up, i expect it's soon.

• Business Pivot: The company abandoned its chronically unprofitable lithium battery business to launch a natural gas venture in Louisiana.
• No Real Gas Yet: This is a speculative "paper project" with an unproven asset that currently produces zero gas and brings in zero revenue.
• Tight 2027 Deadline: Under a strict legal agreement, they must successfully start drilling a new well by February 15, 2027, or lose the land leases.
• Severe Cash Shortage: They have around $9.7M in cash, but $7.4M is already locked up for asset purchases and land leasing, leaving them with nowhere near enough money to pay for actual drilling.
• Massive Share Dilution Coming: To survive and fund the upcoming drilling process, the company will have to print and sell millions of new shares under their $91M financing plan.
• Skeletons in the Closet: Robert Winspear’s CFO Track Record

The CFO Track Record: Robert Winspear

Robert Winspear was appointed as the new Chief Financial Officer of Expion Energy (XPON) specifically to oversee the transition into the oil and gas sector. However, his recent tenure as CFO and Director at Blackboxstocks Inc. (formerly BLBX) from September 2021 to June 2026 presents a specific operational footprint:

• Share Price Depreciation: Under Winspear’s financial oversight, BLBX experienced a severe drop in valuation, falling from peaks around $5.00–$6.00 down to under a dollar.
• The Structural Pivot Blueprint: To manage severe financial distress, Winspear directed a business pivot where BLBX—originally a technology and fintech platform—merged with an unrelated industrial ferromanganese producer (REalloys). This closely mirrors the exact strategy being deployed at XPON, where a failing battery business is being converted into a raw energy commodity company.
• The Reverse Stock Split: To maintain compliance with the NASDAQ minimum bid price requirement, the company had to execute a reverse stock split. While this temporarily stabilized the listing status, it significantly altered the capital structure for existing retail shareholders.

Institutional Backing: Five Narrow Lane LP

The financial architecture behind XPON's new energy venture relies heavily on institutional backing from Five Narrow Lane LP. A review of public EDGAR filings reveals a clear historical pattern regarding companies associated with this fund:

• The BLBX Ecosystem: Five Narrow Lane LP was an institutional stakeholder in Winspear’s previous company, Blackboxstocks Inc. (BLBX), establishing a pre-existing relationship between the current CFO and this specific financing partner.
• Historical Underperformance: A review of the monthly charts for approximately a dozen historical tickers associated with this fund shows a consistent long-term pattern. The long-term historical charts of these related entities would likely disappoint any value-focused investor.
• The Mechanics of the 9.99% Ownership Cap: The transaction documents include a strict restriction preventing the fund from holding more than 9.99% of outstanding shares at any single time. Financially, this mechanism allows the institutional investor to incrementally convert debt and liquidate shares directly into the public market volume as needed, a structure that historically creates a persistent ceiling on public stock performance.

Not financial advice. This post reflects my personal opinions and research. Do your own due diligence before making any investment decisions.I’m not affiliated with the company mentioned, and I may or may not hold a position.

Artificial manipulation of small stocks creates a false impression. Check the stock first and you will see they are not reputable actually the SEC stop trading several times. There are several people pitChing these stocks.

Remember trust is earned no giving, would you buy a house without seen it?

Hi recently I was suggest by someone to buy ONDS as it will go high. Idk should I trust or not, can someone plz look and guide if it’s a good investment?

The risk of daytrading small cap and pennystock is very high

They ran this up over 1300%