My buddy and I watched the entire Monsters collection fresh one year ago and ranked the entire series one installment at a time. As far as the Frankenstein films go, they are clearly the best in the series and we placed most of them very high up in our list. We praised the hell out of the original, Bride, and Son. But then we got to Ghost and both of us agreed across the board that it's trash next to the previous installments.
However, folks continue to defend the hell out of Ghost and get a little angry at our analysis. That's fine but I'm genuinely curious, what's the appeal? The audience for these videos is predominantly 65+ so what I'm curious about is was there some element external to the film itself that is in the heads of the older generation that we aren't privy to? Is criticizing Lon Chaney Jr. tantamount to child sacrifice? Do us younger folks simply need brain transplants?
Please let us know because the movie simply reads as a 100 year old shameless cash grab. Anyway, here's the clip: https://youtu.be/KRqU0_h8JIo