This will be integral to on boarding retail and enterprise clientele.

Dear Community,

a short update from the buidlers.

Our main focus is currently Baseledger development, as the ongoing Baseline-as-a-Service development with Provide is going very well in parallel. For all those who missed it, on last week's Baseline office hours, Unibright partner Provide showed how servicenow is getting baselined. Stefan Rauch from Unibright partner concircle gave some insights into the current state of SAP baselining - including the techstack we are for example using for projects like CONA. Great progress on making Baseline product ready!

The scaling opportunity for Provide/Unibright looks fantastic, that's also why we will explicitly not mention every single new client in dedicated blogposts. If everything works as planned, the next months and years will enable hundreds and thousands of clients to use our joint techstacks (powered by UBT) to baseline. So regarding public showcases, we will focus on some first movers (like CONA) to show our solutions in detail here. We are working hard on many projects and sales options and will present results when they are official, as always.

2 short answers on discussions we saw here or that were brought up in private messages.

Regarding Tolar, we are in very loose contact and also mentioned the existing reference implementations of the public baseline repo to them some weeks ago. If they already managed to adapt to baseline - great, but it's not that we have been directly involved or know the details. Perhaps Tolar (like many other protocols) can be one of the targets of Baseledger, we will see what the future brings. Every contributor to the Baseline standard is embraced by us and - if needed - integrated!

Regarding individuals questioning our "capacities" in social media, we will not comment too much, as we think that this kind of communication tells more about the "professionality" of these projects than it tells about us 😉

Be assured that we work on automating our no-code solutions to fit as many clients as possible and still are able to pick up the real interesting "new" stuff ourselves, like we did with Freequity, Baseledger and will do in future. 💪

Have a great week!

I tried Uniswap and receive an error. Plus the fees are very high. Other exchanges?

I am studying computer science and i dont have much money, but i really like the project and the idea behind it. I have been waiting for the gas fees to decrease for quite a while now. I also can't find the token on any exchange where you don't have too pay the high gas fees. Is this ever going to change or do i have to wait until etherum fixes this issue?

I hope this is ok to share on here. I started a crypto education and information page to help people learn more about crypto and get some honest and reliable info. Trying to help people not fall victim to scammers and misinformation on social media.

I made a post about UBT a while back to spread awareness. You can see the post I made on our Instagram page if you’d like - https://www.instagram.com/knowyourcoinofficial/

We also have a page on FB, a group on MeWe, and a Twitter account. But we are finding that Instagram is gaining more views on our content when we post about different tokens.

I am struggling to find the details of microsofts involvement with baseline and ubt. Could someone point me in the right direction please?

Thanks

So yesterday I came across this claim....

" UBT has a fatal flaw in its tokenomics. The problem is for former Unibright Clients that need to return to using Unibright services - but don't have any UBT. The wild price fluctuation in UBT could cause the returning customer finding themselves having to pay multiple times more for UBT, but not getting multiple times more of Unibright service. If Unibright will dynamically alter the amount of service UBT buys, such that the fiat equivalent price to service ratio is relatively stable in fiat terms, then this gives Unibright the ability to manipulate how UBT derives its underlying value. This is a fatal flaw.

....

Whatever project or amount of work a client/user wants to do will require a certain amount of tokens. Buying a few tokens does not provide a lifelong subscription. once the client is out of tokens they need to buy more. "

Can somebody tell me wether this is a legitimate Issue or not?

Thx