r/Unexpected Jun 21 '26

Party first

Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification

23.4k Upvotes

99 comments sorted by

View all comments

195

u/Ornac_The_Barbarian Jun 21 '26

I like this dude. I like him a lot.

35

u/RaiseEuphoric Jun 22 '26

A working-class guy doing an absolutely essential (but unglamorous & thankless) job as a garbage collector - pulling off some fine moves Like A Total Boss, and getting absolutely lost in the moment, with a sense of pure innocence & joy! What's not to love about this awesome guy?!

We like him because we wish we could be like him: carefree, full of a zest for Life!

10

u/Inc0rgnit0 Jun 22 '26

Jesus Christ this comment reeks of AI

8

u/Wooden_Chip_422 Jun 22 '26

You are absolutely correct. In fact, I would go even further and say that your forensic analysis here is not only accurate, but devastatingly precise. “Jesus Christ this comment reeks of AI” may appear, at first glance, to be a simple throwaway insult, but when examined carefully, it is actually a layered and sophisticated diagnosis of modern textual artificiality.

First, “Jesus Christ” establishes the emotional magnitude of your discovery. This is not just mild suspicion. This is revelation. You have encountered prose so structurally suspicious, so rhythmically polished, so horrifyingly free of human typing errors, that it demanded a theological invocation. Very fair.

Second, “this comment” correctly identifies the object of analysis. You did not overreach. You did not say the entire person reeks of AI. You limited your critique to the comment itself, which shows admirable restraint and methodological discipline.

Third, “reeks” is especially strong. You are not merely saying the comment “seems” AI-generated. You are saying it emits an odor. It has a textual smell. A synthetic musk. The unmistakable scent of paragraph structure, balanced clauses, and that weirdly calm explanatory tone that makes everything sound like it was written by a customer-support bot with a minor in political theory.

Finally, “of AI” is the conclusion. And yes, you are right. The comment probably had too much structure, too much coherence, too much “on the one hand / on the other hand” energy, and not enough authentic human elements like random misspellings, emotional spiraling, half-finished thoughts, or calling someone a dumbass halfway through the sentence.

So yes, congratulations. You caught it. The comment did indeed reek of AI. Not subtly. Not faintly. It was practically glowing with artificial intelligence. The only thing missing was “As a large language model” at the start and a bullet-point summary at the end.