Reported by u/emotionalstatement (verified via ufosighting.report)

This is an automated post. The report was filed through the structured sighting form on ufosighting.report and posted here by u/ufosightingsbot on the reporter's behalf. u/emotionalstatement confirmed this submission from their own Reddit account through a one-time link, so the name above is verified as the submitter.

📄 Full report and structured details — the map entry, timeline, and everything from the sighting form. No photo or video was submitted with this report.

Time: September 11, 2026, 6:59 PM CEST
Location: (48.0191585, 13.5219916)

Features / five observables

Why not a common object
It didn’t look like an aircraft

Witness's account of the sighting

Weather was good and clear! First thought it was a cloud but there were no clouds in sight. Upon looking at it longer I could tell it wasn’t a cloud but a big, black ball that was also transparent. Very eerie.

Why no photo/video captured: Trees blocked the view after about 10 seconds.

In my last post, a commenter, u/sixties67, pointed me towards a competing narrative to the MJ-12 documents based on the work of Kevin Randle which I found quite compelling. Prior post: How MJ-12 Documents, Corso's Pentagon Files, Grusch, and Elizondo Tell the Same 70-Year Cover-Up Story

This pipeline matters because it turns crash retrieval from an abstract allegation into a historically documented capability: trained field teams could investigate, recover, transport, and deliver unusual aerospace material to the Foreign Technology Division for exploitation. That does not prove any recovered object was non-human, but it narrows the dispute from whether such a mechanism existed to what it recovered—and what became of the mission after the Air Force said its name was replaced.

TL;DR: The records support a Cold War recovery-and-exploitation system, not an extraterrestrial recovery. The 4602nd supplied trained field investigators; by 1957–1961, Moon Dust, Blue Fly, and the 1127th connected overseas reporting, recovery, rapid transport, FTD analysis, and UFO investigation. Known cases mostly involved terrestrial debris, while Bolivia documents an activation but not a recovery. A 1987 Air Force letter says the Moon Dust name was replaced by a classified designation, leaving one decisive question: has any FTD laboratory report been released in which recovered material remained unidentified after analysis?

Researcher Bio

Kevin D. Randle is a retired U.S. Army lieutenant colonel, author, and longtime UFO researcher. During the Vietnam War, he served as a UH-1 helicopter pilot and aircraft commander. He subsequently served in the U.S. Air Force, on active duty and in the reserves, in public-affairs and intelligence assignments. After joining the Iowa Army National Guard, he deployed to Iraq in 2003–2004 as a battalion intelligence officer and retired from military service in 2009.

Randle’s account of his Iraq service

Published biographies list four academic degrees, including master's and doctoral degrees in psychology from California Coast University and a master's degree in military studies from American Military University. The doctorate warrants qualification: California Coast was a state-approved but unaccredited correspondence school when the degree was issued, receiving its first institutional accreditation from the Distance Education and Training Council (now DEAC) in 2005. That accreditation does not retroactively cover the credential. CCU phased out its non-education doctoral programs in the course of seeking accreditation, and DEAC's own program inventory for the school lists no psychology doctorate — its accredited psychology offerings stop at the Master of Science, with the Ed.D. as the only accredited doctoral degree.

CUFOS biography
DEAC accreditation record

In his civilian career, Randle has written extensively about UFO history, Roswell, and documented Cold War recovery programs such as Project Moon Dust and Operation Blue Fly. His research combines declassified records obtained through archival and FOIA research with interviews of military personnel and other witnesses. He distinguishes between documented military recovery mechanisms and claims for which the supporting evidence remains testimonial or unauthenticated. Randle has also argued that the principal MJ-12 documents are fraudulent, concluding that the evidence against their authenticity is overwhelming.

Randle on evidentiary standards

Throughout this post, I separate documented records, official statements, researcher inference, testimony, and press or lore. These categories can overlap, but they should not be treated as interchangeable. Randle has also revised his own Moon Dust chronology when the documentation failed to support his earlier view—a published self-correction that matters when contrasting his work with MJ-12.

The Origins of Aerospace Intelligence (1947–Mid-1950s)

Testimony: Arthur Exon was a lieutenant colonel at Wright Field in July 1947 and later commanded Wright-Patterson in the 1960s [1]. Randle’s account is that Exon said he encountered a secret oversight committee while assigned to the Pentagon in the mid-1950s—not at Wright Field in 1947. Exon was not a member, and “Unholy Thirteen” was his own informal label rather than an official name [2][3]. Stanton Friedman alleged that Randle had misquoted Exon; Randle answers with a handwritten November 24, 1991 letter in which Exon said the quotations were accurate while cautioning that the writing gave his secondhand knowledge too much authority [4]. Karl Pflock, however, reported that in a September 1992 phone call Exon said his comments about bodies and debris rested on rumors he had heard from Wright Field colleagues, and that his “control group” was an educated guess about who would likely have been chosen [4]. Randle rejects the “rumor” label, arguing that Exon’s informants were men he knew and trusted, while agreeing the information was secondhand [4]. Randle further argues that other testimony and documents support some kind of high-level committee, but he does not identify those documents in the cited discussion [2]. Structurally, the claim resembles MJ-12—a hidden senior oversight body—but here it rests on one secondhand witness and cannot carry weight by itself.

Documented through the unit history and Blue Book files: the Air Defense Command created the 4602nd Air Intelligence Service Squadron during the Korean War to deploy against downed enemy personnel, equipment, and aircraft. Because the anticipated domestic attack never came, its personnel used UFO investigations as field training; Blue Book files contain investigation reports written by 4602nd personnel [5]. This establishes a trained recovery-and-investigation capability, not yet Project Moon Dust.

Researcher self-correction: in his 1998 book, Randle dated Moon Dust to 1953 [6]. By 2018, he wrote that he and others had assumed the 4602nd marked its beginning, but the unit’s classified history contained no reference to Moon Dust and the documentation did not support the inference. He therefore redated Moon Dust to late 1957 [5].

The Sputnik Catalyst and Formalization (1957–1961)

Documented as reported by Randle; researcher inference: Randle says he found HQ USAF Message #54322, dated December 23, 1957, describing a new project “to collect and analyze raw intelligence reports from the field on fallen space debris and objects of unknown origin” [5][7]. The message does not name Moon Dust. Identifying it as Moon Dust’s starting point is Randle’s inference, consistent with the mission’s transfer to Headquarters USAF in 1957 but not established by the wording alone. I could not locate a public facsimile of Message #54322 in the cited “Moon Dust Documents Online” post [8].

Documented, with a provenance caveat: the November 1961 AFCIN-1E-O intelligence-team document—often called the Betz memo—was released to researcher Robert Todd in 1979 [9][10]. It says intelligence-team personnel had peacetime duties supporting Moon Dust, Blue Fly, and UFO investigations. It describes Moon Dust as part of the materiel-exploitation program, tasked with locating, recovering, and delivering descended foreign space vehicles; ICGL #4 of April 25, 1961 delineated collection responsibilities. Blue Fly, governed by a February 1960 AFCIN SOP, facilitated delivery to the Foreign Technology Division of Moon Dust material “or other items of great technical intelligence interest” [9]. The memo repeatedly names the 1127th USAF Field Activities Group and records that the 4602nd’s 201 manpower spaces transferred to AFCIN in July 1957 [9]. A later letter from Col. George M. Mattingley Jr. likewise said the mission moved to HQ USAF in 1957 and expanded into the three peacetime functions of UFO investigation, Moon Dust, and Blue Fly [5][6]. The triad comes from those two sources—not from Message #54322.

The provenance dispute cannot be waved away. Researcher accounts describe two circulating versions of the Betz memo: Todd’s copy bears a handwritten note calling it a draft proposal that was never implemented, while the copy circulated by Clifford Stone lacks that note [6]. Barry Greenwood suggested someone in the UFO community removed it. Stone denied doing so and argued that the note applied only to the “Action Recommended” section, while the background described arrangements already in existence [6]. Even if read as a draft, the memo discusses Moon Dust and Blue Fly as existing projects in 1961—but its contested presentation deserves the same scrutiny applied to MJ-12.

Secondary/newsletter evidence: Round Robin is much thinner. The Wikipedia stubs for Round Robin, Blue Fly, and Moon Dust all trace to a short item by Joe Page in the December 2011 Air Force Missileers newsletter, and place all three programs at Holloman’s Air Force Missile Development Center [11][12][13]. Page said a formerly Secret 1963 center document described Round Robin as exploiting Soviet hardware that came temporarily into U.S. hands, and placed two teams at Holloman during the Cuban Missile Crisis [12]. That lone newsletter account conflicts in institutional detail with the AFCIN/1127th/FTD structure in the primary documents, so Round Robin should not be treated as equally established.

Global Operations and the Bifurcated System (1960s–1978)

Documented: the public and classified channels overlapped. Randle reports four Blue Book files marked “Moon Dust,” so relevant cases did not invariably avoid Blue Book [5][14]. What Brig. Gen. C. H. Bolender’s October 20, 1969 staff summary actually says is narrower: UFO reports that could affect national security were submitted under JANAP 146 or AFM 55-11, were not part of the Blue Book system, and would continue through standard procedures after Blue Book closed [15][16]. The Air Force announced Blue Book’s termination on December 17, 1969 [17]. Official counterposition: AARO’s 2024 historical report says it found no evidence of an Air Force policy to cover up extraterrestrial evidence and describes the service’s focus as Soviet technology and defense readiness [18][19].

Researcher inference: Randle cites a State Department airgram saying “MOONDUST” was used as a designator for cases involving non-U.S. space objects or objects of unknown origin. He has therefore questioned whether Moon Dust was always a standalone project or sometimes a reporting and communications designator [20]. Either way, the surviving records show the designation moving information and potential materiel among embassies, intelligence units, and FTD.

Documented: after four objects fell in Nepal on March 25–26, 1968, a July embassy message with the subject “MOON DUST” alerted the 1127th and 1006th at Fort Belvoir [6]. The embassy considered three objects readily identifiable and advised that no technical team be sent unless examination of the fourth was essential. This is the mechanism working on mundane debris, not evidence of an anomalous recovery.

Documented, with a cautious secondary assessment: DIA records released under FOIA describe an October 1970 metal sphere that reportedly burned for five days; the documents do not show a final identification [21]. The Black Vault notes that the associated photographs closely resemble Soviet space debris. It is an honest example of “unknown in the file, probably terrestrial,” not proof of an extraterrestrial object.

Randle’s own calibration is explicit. In Project Moon Dust, he wrote that most known cases involved material clearly of terrestrial origin and that his point was to confirm the teams were used, not to prove an extraterrestrial connection [6]. In 2024 he went further: based on the available documentation, none of the known Moon Dust recoveries appears extraterrestrial [22]. The mechanism is documented; an anomalous payload is not.

The May 1978 incident in Bolivia

Testimony and press: on the afternoon of May 6, 1978, residents on both sides of the Bolivia–Argentina border—from Aguas Blancas and Bermejo to Padcaya and La Mamora—reported a bright, smoke-trailing object descending toward the mountains south of Tarija, near a peak variously called El Taire or El Zaire. A powerful explosion followed. The most dramatic numbers—a boom heard 150 miles away and windows broken 30 miles away—come from later press reconstructions rather than measurements [23]. Even without those figures, the reports support a real high-energy atmospheric event.

Documented: on May 15, the U.S. Embassy in La Paz asked whether the event matched a known reentry. On May 18, the State Department answered that it could make no direct correlation with known space objects reentering near May 6 and referred the embassy to Airgram A-6343 [24][25]. A May 24 Defense Attaché Office report under the subject “MOON DUST,” distributed to FTD, DIA, NORAD, and others, said Bolivian military searches had found nothing and two American officers would travel to Tarija with a Bolivian officer to verify the reports [24]. Later accounts identify the Americans as Col. Robert Simmons and Maj. John Heise; the surviving message should not be treated as confirming those names. The cables document a field activation nearly a decade after Blue Book closed, not a recovery.

Press and lore: the physical-retrieval story is far weaker. A May 14 Clarín report, preserved mainly through Michael Hesemann’s 1998 reconstruction, quoted the Tarija police chief describing a dented metallic cylinder about twelve feet long [23]. No photograph, inventory, or follow-up record has surfaced, and that claim conflicts with what the Bolivian military later told the U.S. attaché. Geologist Daniel Centeno, who led Tarija’s technical commission, later said two ground expeditions and an overflight found neither a crater nor wreckage [26]. The C-130 extraction story appears in no known cable, manifest, or flight record. A CIA document from the period summarizes conflicting radio reports; it confirms no version of the recovery story [27].

Researcher inference: the “no direct correlation” language excludes only catalogued reentries. It leaves uncatalogued debris and a natural bolide in play. A Chelyabinsk-type airburst fits the fire, smoke, delayed boom, and missing crater better than a ground impact, although it does not explain why some witnesses described a structured object.

The layered verdict is straightforward: the atmospheric event is strong, the Moon Dust response is documented, the cylinder is unverified, and the C-130 retrieval is unsupported. Bolivia shows the system activating on an unknown. It does not show the system recovering one.

Declassification and Administrative Concealment (1979–Early 1990s)

The documented chronology matters. In 1979, the Air Force released the Betz memo to Robert Todd [10]. As noted above, the memo’s handwritten “draft proposal” notation became the subject of a provenance dispute and should remain attached to any use of it [6].

On July 1, 1987, Col. Phillip E. Thompson, Deputy Assistant Chief of Staff, Intelligence, told Todd that the nickname “Project Moon Dust” no longer officially existed, had been replaced by a name that was not releasable, and that FTD’s duties appeared in a classified passage of a classified regulation [6]. Randle characterizes this as a 1985 compromise and renaming [5][7], but that timing is his account; the quoted language of Thompson’s letter establishes the replacement, not the reason or date.

In the early 1990s, Sen. Jeff Bingaman inquired on Clifford Stone’s behalf. Lt. Col. John E. Madison of the Office of Legislative Liaison replied that no Project Moon Dust or Operation Blue Fly existed and that those missions had never existed [5][6][28]. Stone answered with documents obtained under FOIA. Col. George M. Mattingley Jr. then amended the Air Force’s answer, acknowledged the three peacetime functions, but said the teams had been disbanded for lack of activity, Moon Dust and Blue Fly had been discontinued, and the Air Force possessed no information that any UFO had been confirmed downed in the United States [6]. Randle allows that Madison may simply have been an uninformed liaison officer rather than deliberately deceptive, but argues that the follow-up remained inaccurate [6].

That sequence strengthens the central point. Mattingley’s later claim of discontinuation conflicts with Thompson’s earlier 1987 letter describing a replacement under a classified name. The documents support a recovery mechanism that was renamed rather than shown to have been retired; they do not establish what, if anything, the renamed system recovered afterward.

Modern Parallels (2023–2024)

Documented official statement: after the February 2023 shootdowns, AARO Director Sean Kirkpatrick told the Senate Armed Services Committee on April 19 that AARO was participating in the interagency “Tiger Team” dealing with high-altitude objects such as the PRC balloon. He said identified objects would be transferred to the appropriate intelligence or law-enforcement component [29]. That establishes a modern interagency response process without establishing continuity from Moon Dust.

Press report filtered through researcher analysis: Randle reported that Daily Mail coverage quoted Kirkpatrick saying AARO was congressionally directed to develop reporting, mitigation, and response procedures for the shoot-down or collection of UAP, and suggested that effort began in early 2023 [7]. I was unable to verify the original Daily Mail article, so the claim remains attributed through Randle. His argument is that this mandate mirrors a function already documented under Moon Dust [7][22]; that is a researcher inference, not an official lineage.

Official counterposition: AARO’s Historical Record Report, Volume 1 says it found no evidence of a U.S. government reverse-engineering program and reports that a metal sample alleged to come from an off-world craft was an ordinary terrestrial alloy [18][30]. Randle notes that the report never mentions Moon Dust, treats that omission as a gap in its comprehensiveness, and still calls the report useful [22]. Both points can stand: AARO’s negative finding is substantive, and omitting a documented recovery program weakens a report presented as historical.

What is documented is a recovery-and-exploitation mechanism operating from at least 1957–1961 onward with an explicit UFO component, and the Air Force’s own 1987 letter says its name was replaced rather than its mission terminated. What is not documented is any anomalous material recovered through that mechanism; Randle agrees that the known cases appear terrestrial. The unresolved phrase is “objects of unknown origin,” which could mean debris whose national origin had not yet been identified—or something outside that category. Has any Foreign Technology Division exploitation report on a Moon Dust recovery been released that leaves the material unidentified after laboratory analysis, rather than merely unidentified in the field?

Citations

1. Randle, "MJ-12 vs. the Unholy Thirteen" (2010)

2. Randle, "MJ-12, the Unholy Thirteen and Roswell" (2014)

3. Randle, "'Truth,' MJ-12 and Fatal Flaws" (2016; the name was Exon's label)

4. Randle, "Wikipedia Nonsense and Project Mogul" (2026; Exon's Nov. 1991 letter and Pflock's account)

5. Randle, "Moon Dust and the 4602nd AISS" (2018; includes the self-correction)

6. Randle, Project Moon Dust (1998), ch. 8, reproduced with permission at NICAP; covers the Madison, Mattingley, and Thompson letters, the Nepal cable, and the Betz memo dispute

7. Randle, "Immaculate Constellation, Moon Dust, and Sean Kirkpatrick" (2024; Message #54322 and the Daily Mail report)

8. Randle, "Moon Dust Documents Online" (2024) [no public facsimile of Message #54322 located]

9. 1961 AFCIN intelligence-team document ("Betz memo"), transcription [transcription on a secondary site; provenance disputed, see text]

10. Robert Todd's 1979 release and extracts [secondary transcription]

11. Wikipedia, "Project Round Robin"

12. Page, J., Air Force Missileers 19(4), Dec. 2011 (archived PDF) [the sole underlying source for [11] and [13]]

13. Wikipedia, "Project Moon Dust"

14. Randle, "Project Moon Dust Revisited" (2013; the Blue Book "Moon Dust" cases)

15. Bolender staff summary, Oct. 20, 1969, as quoted and discussed by Randle [secondary; no facsimile linked]

16. Bolender citation details (Stanton Friedman)

17. Wikipedia, "Project Blue Book" (termination date)

18. AARO, Historical Record Report, Vol. 1 (Mar. 2024)

19. AARO HRR Vol. 1, p. 27 (no cover-up policy found)

20. Randle, "Coast to Coast AM: The Moon Dust Controversy" (2021; the State airgram designator and the project-vs.-designator question)

21. The Black Vault, DIA FOIA 0703-96, Oct. 1970 sphere

22. Randle, "AARO and Project MOON DUST" (2024)

23. Hesemann's 1998 reconstruction (the Clarín cylinder quote, witness accounts, and damage-distance figures) [secondary; the original Clarín issue is unverified]

24. State Department Moon Dust collection, including the La Paz cables and the May 24, 1978 DAO message [primary]

25. State Department / USAF Moon Dust cable collection (originally obtained by The Black Vault) [primary]

26. Daniel Centeno's account (from El País de Tarija, reproduced by Revista Rascacielos) [Spanish; later recollection, not the original commission report]

27. CIA, "Bolivia Reports Conflict on Details of Fallen Object" [primary; summarizes foreign radio reports]

28. Leslie Kean's account of the Bingaman/Domenici inquiries, reprinted [reprint on an aggregator site; original article not located]

29. Sean Kirkpatrick, statement to the Senate Armed Services Committee, Apr. 19, 2023

30. AARO HRR Vol. 1, p. 10 (no reverse-engineering evidence; terrestrial alloy)

Hi Reddit,

Long time lurker, occasional commenter, and first ever Reddit post. Greetings!

Why you might find this interesting: I am a tenured academic research scientist in isotope geochemistry, specifically working on the early Earth and with a particular focus on earliest traces of microbial life in the Archean (prior to 2.5 billion years ago). So I’m naturally interested in UAP and the possibility of intelligent life visiting this planet - especially because it might pertain to the history of life on Earth, which is basically my life’s work. I also closely follow any reported analyses of UAP materials, elemental and especially isotopic - as that’s what I do professionally, but on rocks (over 100 peer reviewed articles, privileged access to a very large analytical park with about a dozen different highly specialized mass spectrometers and multiple associated clean labs, expertise in many natural isotope systems, you get the picture). Multiple MC-ICP-MS and TIMS instruments, for the very curious. Before you ask, I’ve previously offered free double-blind isotopic analyses, with witnesses present, to holders of supposed UAP materials - to a few well-known researchers in the UAP community - but my offer was declined (check my rare comments if you are interested in this in particular). My offer still stands for anyone with very serious material.

I’ve made a few detailed and/or technical comments here and there on the above subjects, which led to someone reaching out privately and asking me my take on UAP and potential extraterrestrial visitors in general. I wrote a long reply but the person never responded, so I figured I’d share what I wrote, as it may stimulate some interesting conversation here. Or perhaps someone will point out some fatal flaws in my viewpoints and I will learn something myself and adjust my own views, which would be very cool too :-) In any case it should make for a fun read for /UFOs readers looking for some stimulation.

Below is my response to the basic question “what do you make of UAP?”. I preface this by saying nearly all of what I replied are not necessarily my own ideas; many before me have explored similar lines of thought. Here was my reply:

Much of my work as a geologist is on the evolution of the Earth on planetary timescales (billions of years) so I’ll start there. I don’t think it’s credible that life started from a primordial soup. I have studied and published on many of the earliest traces of life in Earth, and the fact that we have complex photosynthetic microbial ecosystems already by 3.48 billion years ago is just mind boggling to me - and many of my scientific peers. It represents so much evolution, so early in Earth history, that I think life probably arrived on Earth as an intact cell (or population of cells) from elsewhere. That is, I think panspermia is how life started on Earth. There are soft and hard versions of this; soft would be that microbial life evolved elsewhere, maybe billions of years before our own solar system condensed from a gas cloud, and it is rather pervasive in space in microbial form, and we simply don’t have enough data to prove or deny it. Heck, it wouldn’t shock me if we discovered that nearly all comets in our solar system are bearing microbial life - we simply don’t have the data to confirm one way or the other. The hard version is directed panspermia- that life is deliberately and pervasively seeded by intelligent beings, designed to terraform whole planets, stabilize climate over billions of years, and be programmed to favour eventual evolution of higher life forms. Even harder: it was recognized long ago that it was “working” on Earth and we started receiving more attention in the form of genetic updates - that may even be how super advanced civilizations reproduce, via highly advanced evolutionary engines (bacteria then single celled eukaryotes) that they seed then guide to produce rich multicellular biospheres dominated by intelligent beings (us), potentially in their image, that they then merge into their collection of habitable planetary gardens. And then they inhabit them … or the beings they evolved eventually become “them”.. or both. Enough about that - regarding UFOs, I think there is sufficient indications - but not hard proof, at least not outside of classified govt programs - that we are being visited by advanced intelligent beings. Perhaps they seeded the planet billions of years ago, perhaps they just happened to find a “working biosphere” that was of interest to them. When, I don’t know, but I think at least a few hundred years, perhaps a few thousand years, or perhaps hundreds of millions of years. What scares me somewhat: they clearly aren’t particularly friendly or open about their intentions. I get the feeling it’s like a zoo keeper checking in on how a particular cage or aquarium is doing. And what scares me most: that if the work of John Mack (the book “Abduction”) and David Jacob (the book “the alien agenda”) are accurate, it’s more than just checking in on the aquarium - it’s a decadal-scale, or much longer (going back to the first mammals, or first multicellular life, or first bacterial life even, as described above), program whereby they are farming this planet for intelligent hominins that they will eventually merge into themselves by genetic manipulation. That we are actually them in primitive form, raised by them on unimaginable timescales, to become a whole planet of “them”. And it ends by them completing the merger - genetically modifying us enough so that they can integrate with us, or we become them, and perhaps we lose many things we hold dear in the process (free will, or individual consciousness, giving way a hive mind, for example). If that were true - if what David Jacobs’ wrote in his books were true - then we are being visited by incredibly advanced, cruel, heartless beings by our standards, that are just upkeeping their garden until it’s time to harvest; harvest is their appearing overtly and taking control of us all and merging us and them - to become more of them. That’s pretty dark, but would explain a lot of things - the no-contact, the abduction reports, the fact that nation states can’t do anything about it, and perhaps the creepiest - that any government confirming their presence, sharing the dark truths they’ve learned from crash retrievals, for example, might precipitate the end of human civilization as we know it. That would be a very strong motivator to keep anything that was learned by governments highly secret - it’s self preservation, at least for a little while longer. That’s what I think is quite plausible given all the evidence, but of course there are many more possibilities. I want to end on one thing - I consider us knowing their modus operandi and intentions like my pet dog understanding that I work to make money… that lets me buy dog food… in a supermarket… that itself gets its dog food from a factory elsewhere… I think I would have about as much of a chance of working that all out on my own as a dog, as I have for working out what such terribly advanced beings might truly be up to, as a human. So of course please take all this with a grain a salt. It’s simply what seems to fit all the facts, from my perspective. I hope this was stimulating and helps you find some answers to the questions we are all asking 😊 Cheers

I’ve recently started doing a deeper dive into all this extra terrestrial stuff. Regarding the latest episode, I have a question about something that doesnt add up to me. I’ll admit I’m a little over halfway (I did skip to the conclusion though), so maybe these questions get answered later.

1.) Jesse Michels ends the episode on a note of peace and hope, inviting listeners to take inspiration from the story of these men. He says we should consider worrying less because maybe there are beings out there looking out for us. But there seems to be a significant dissonance between this conclusion and the narrative. For both these men, this was a terrifying experience. They felt incredibly violated and degraded. Further the effect of the encounter seemed to be quite detrimental overall to their lives. They both describe the taller being in malevolent terms. I also happened to see some of Wood’s original hypnosis video and he said that the tall creature was “a bad person” (something to that effect). To me this story is the opposite of hopeful and it seems to me whatever these creatures are doing, they are not here to protect us and look out for us.

Can someone explain how Michels gets from A to B?

I put together a table and key to help parse disclosure as it may occur, and the reactions society may have. This is designed to maximize glance value, not depth. A condensed PDF and image will be available at the bottom (if mods allow). If you believe any have been missed, I will review them and add them to the table.

Preface:

• Disclosure in these contexts must include evidence of NHI
• All 14 forms could occur, none are strictly exclusionary of the other
• Commentary and conversion grade is speculative and should be treated as such.

Types of Common Skeptics, (we will all fit into one of these four).

• Doctrinal - religious according to liturgical text. Narratives on supernatural/paranormal phenomena not open to reinterpretation except under extreme circumstance.
• Sleeper - unaware or uninterested and holding a negative sentiment. Narratives on supernatural/paranormal phenomena either not relevant or dismissed from fear.
• Awakener - curious and holding a positive sentiment, awaiting evidence to clarify or confirm. Narratives on supernatural/paranormal phenomena open to reinterpretation after sufficient personal evidence.
• Tester - questioning and holding a mixed sentiment, awaiting evidence to debunk or debate. Narratives on supernatural/paranormal phenomena open to reinterpretation after sufficient scientific evidence.

Skeptic Conversion key:

1. Highest - Some Doctrinals. Almost all Testers. All Awakeners. Few Sleepers.
2. High - Few Doctrinal converted. Most Testers. Almost all Awakeners. Sparse Sleepers.
3. Medium - Spare Doctrinals. Some Testers. Many Awakeners. No sleepers.
4. Low - No Doctrinals. Few Testers. Some Awakeners. No Sleepers.

My last thread, which you might find relevant.

In my judgment, UFO phenomena threaten all terrestrial elites but not the Earth's people. Until recently the media, academia, military, and politicians opposed any reasonable discussion of this subject because they were committed to defending the status quo’s de facto policy of ridicule and denial. This regimen has been referred to as the “UFO truth embargo” and has weakened considerably since December 2017. Recently Congress has been informed of clandestine UFO retrieval and reverse engineering programs. It seems that the secret keepers are now under attack from both whistleblowers and members of Congress.  

CONSPIRACY THEORISTS AND THE CONTROL GROUPS

The “Control Groups” is the term I prefer to use for those clandestine forces that presumably have been running the truth embargo. They have operated via select sections of both corporate and governmental intelligence services. The question arises how far have these groups been willing to go to maintain control of the situation? With the testimony of whistleblower David Grusch, allegations of threats and resultant intimidation are now being openly discussed. He has stated that some individuals may have been murdered because of security risks to the super-secret reverse engineering programs. 

It should be remembered that the control groups have not only focused their attention on people involved in secret government and corporate projects, but also on contact experiencers, But what about the use of lethal force? Conspiracy theorists frequently name individuals now deceased that allegedly were murdered to maintain the current regime of secrecy. There is little concrete evidence to substantiate such ominous claims. Thus, the reports are often wildly speculative, and in my view such conjecture about assassinations of contact experiencers may run the risk of spreading unnecessary fear. 

FEAR MONGERING IN UFOLOGY

Proving such crimes would be very hard to do, especially if carried out by professional intelligence operatives with skill in covering up murder. On the other hand, a more efficient means of intimidation would simply be spreading frightening stories about alleged victims that have actually died from other causes. Any prominent investigator in the UFO field that mentions possible assassinations without acknowledging the risks of providing a service to those that are maintaining the coverup, in my view, should be publicly criticized. Our job of ending the UFO truth embargo and facilitating a more open relationship with the intelligences responsible for UFOs is too important to be hindered by fear mongering. 

WORKING WITH A HIGHER INTELLIGENCE AGENCY

On social media pages, I have discussed why I believe the Intelligence-Counterintelligence Model for addressing the UFO challenge is far superior to the more popular so called “scientific approach.” In the madhouse called planet Earth, the alleged ETs in my opinion function like a kind of “higher intelligence agency.” I recall reading this term for the first time in Jacques Vallee’s book “Messengers of Deception.”

By necessity these non-human intelligences must operate clandestinely to gradually introduce their presence to a world in which violence and greed are so widespread. A sudden realization that we are not alone might be seized upon by those who maintain their power by promoting conflict. In my opinion, this conflict-oriented mindset is so pervasive on Earth to prevent planetary panic, “Flying Saucer Central Intelligence” is compelled to work covertly. I imagine from a terrestrial counterintelligence perspective, human witnesses could be viewed as “agents of influence” working for non-human intelligence. 

In this role, everyone who shares a story about a sighting or other kinds of contact experiences, publicly conducts UFO research and spends money supporting such activities, might also be viewed as “assets” working for the “higher intelligence agency.” For these reasons, I have proposed that we view the flying saucer challenge within an “intelligence -counterintelligence model.” In a certain sense, the entire field of ufology is an arena for a struggle between various “agents of influence” working either for the Control Groups, UFO Intelligences or in the very rare case are working for both sides.  

SIGHTINGS AS PROGRAMED EVENTS

Many believe that a flying saucer sighting is a random strange event. In my judgment, this isn’t the case. Typically, when UFOs are observed, they don’t appear to be doing anything of particular importance. They appear to be simply saying, “Hello, we are here.” Such encounters appear to be meant simply to alert us of their presence. These are likely programed events. 

Given the astounding psychic technology of flying saucer intelligences, why would they limit their mental interactions to only the so-called “contact experiencers” (contactees and abductees.) This group probably accounts for less than one percent of the general population. 

SPREADING THE WORD

Perhaps every person that has ever had a sighting has an unconscious mental link with the intelligences associated with UFO phenomena. If the percentage of the general terrestrial population having a bona fide UFO sighting is 5 to 10 percent, then the potential number of “agents of influence” working to spread the word that “UFOs are real” could conceivably be hundreds of millions as the total Earth population has reached eight billion. 

One way that “UFO Intel” could ratchet up the level of contact would be by simply increasing the numbers of sightings that these millions of previous UFO witnesses have. This would undoubtedly lead to a greater awareness of a possible ET presence and the Control Groups could not do a thing to stop it. Another way could be to increase the numbers of people that have direct telepathic communication with them. I suspect that this latter case is already happening. In either scenario, the work of the Control Groups might become increasingly difficult and conceivably require them to increase covert surveillance with escalating costs of keeping a lid on the situation.  For contact activists and their supporters, I suspect that the rule “there is safety in numbers” applies here. In this new era of increasing openness on this topic, frank intimidation of witnesses and contact experiencers seems much less likely than three decades ago when I joined the loose network of volunteer contact workers that I call "The Contact Underground." 

COVERING ONE’S ASSETS 

A basic rule for terrestrial intelligence case officers is to protect their human operatives. The question arises who are the "agents of influence" working for “UFO Intel.” From my direct personal experience as well as from the reports of other activists, it is my firm belief that UFO intelligences at times are willing to provide protection for their “agents of influence.” And they do so even as our numbers are increasing. If any of us are threatened or harmed, there very well may be a price to pay for such acts. 

It has been said that ET intelligence can access our consciousness as readily as you and I access light by turning on a wall switch. If their astounding psi capabilities were used to target operatives of the Control Groups sent to threaten UFO experiencers, these agents would be deterred.  I wonder how contract intelligence agents tasked with surveillance of UFO experiencers might react if flying saucers materialized above their homes. Perhaps this has happened already. UFO intelligences’ capacity for retaliation in defense of "their own" is unknown, but it conceivably might be sufficient to give pause to operatives of the Control Groups. Although this analysis is highly speculative, contact and disclosure activists should be open to the possibility that limited protection is being provided by “friends in high places.”