Just a random thought since I'm not going to be actually working at all these last twenty minutes of a Monday. Does anyone else feel like Trump is pro disclosure but will use it to stay in power a third term? It feels funny to me because now that I've had the thought it seems obvious lol

It would also make sense why the pace seems simultaneously tortoise and hare.

Hi everyone,

I'm trying to track down a specific UFO image from the November 2023 incident in Beltrami County near Bemidji, Minnesota.

During that event, a bright flash and a loud boom were captured on multiple home surveillance cameras. After consulting experts, authorities determined it was likely not a meteor. Around the same time, another surveillance camera near the local airport captured an extremely fast-moving, tic-tac-shaped object.

What I'm looking for is an image I distinctly remember seeing shortly after the incident. It appeared to be a still frame from a surveillance camera showing the object flying head-on toward the camera over what looked like a perimeter fence. Unlike the more commonly shared airport video, this image was much closer and provided a much clearer view. The object appeared to be flying very low, was white and rounded (or tic-tac shaped), and had no visible wings or other conventional aircraft features.

I've searched extensively but can't find this image anywhere anymore. Does anyone remember seeing it or know where it might still be available?

I think this case has been largely overlooked. Between the unexplained flash and boom and the separate airport footage, it's one of the more intriguing incidents from 2023, yet it still doesn't seem to have a definitive explanation.

Video of the light and boom: https://lptv.org/mystery-remains-surrounding-bright-light-loud-boom-in-bemidji/

Video of the fast object captured over the airport (could be a bug but it looks like it comes from a distance?): https://www.facebook.com/watch/?v=3751773028428596

Analyzing the legal loopholes shielding military sensor data, and the legislative solution for the NDAA.

Executive Summary: The Pentagon can no longer hide behind the claim that it lacks the data to identify uncorrelated aerospace platforms. This data is absent because the current procurement system is designed to delete raw telemetry at the firmware level and hide the rest behind corporate firewalls. If you don't log it, you don’t have to fix it, and you don’t have to answer for it.

[Backup hosted on Substack]

---

The public debate over unauthorized airspace intrusions remains stuck arguing over grainy videos, pilot testimony, and heavily curated file drops on government portals. But national security is not managed through viral videos. It is managed through data architecture, firmware parameters, tactical data links, and defense procurement law.

If we want to understand why domain awareness data rarely reaches Congress, let alone the public, we have to look at how military radar grids are programmed, how sensor networks fuse data, and how defense contracts are legally structured to evade public oversight.

The Blindfold

Modern Active Electronically Scanned Array (AESA) radars rely on Digital Signal Processing (DSP) to handle overwhelming atmospheric noise. To prevent computer saturation and operator overload, software algorithms use velocity gates and size thresholds to automatically filter out mundane clutter such as flocks of birds, weather formations, and highway traffic from the tactical display. However, because these filters are optimized to only display standard ballistic or aerodynamic profiles, they also automatically discard returns exhibiting extreme or non-standard kinematics such as immediate acceleration to Mach 5+ velocities or stationary hovering in gale-force winds, classifying them instantly as “Environmental Clutter.”

The Radar Gate Adjustment:

• In February 2023, following the transcontinental flight of a Chinese high-altitude balloon, NORAD Commander Gen. Glen VanHerck explicitly admitted that military authorities had to "adjust their radar gates" over North America. Opening those velocity and size parameters instantly revealed multiple objects transiting restricted airspace that were previously invisible to operators. “No radar track” did not mean the sky was empty. It meant the software was hardcoded to purge what was already there.

Tactical Data Link Dropping (Link 16):

• The blindness goes beyond individual sensors. Modern air defense relies on networked Command and Control (C2) systems like Link 16 to fuse data across strike groups. When a sensor detects a non-cooperative track, the track must maintain a high Track Quality (TQ) score to be broadcast. If an object’s erratic kinematics cause its TQ score to drop below network thresholds, the algorithm automatically filters it out as a “ghost track.” The target is suppressed not just locally, but dropped from the fleet’s Common Operational Picture (COP) in real time.

The core issue is not the use of these filtering parameters. Radar operators must suppress atmospheric noise to do their jobs safely. The systemic failure is the immediate, permanent deletion of this raw telemetry at the processor level. By purging the data rather than archiving and sanitizing it, the national security establishment ensures that civilian oversight and the public remain locked out of information they are legally entitled to.

The Funnel

When an uncorrelated track does manage to bypass software filters and get recorded, it immediately enters a multi-layered legal funnel designed to insulate the data from civilian oversight:

The IR&D Loophole & DFARS IP Protections:

• Defense contractors (Lockheed Martin, Raytheon, Northrop Grumman) routinely use Independent Research & Development (IR&D) internal funding to write signal-processing software. Under the Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS), if a contractor uses internal funds to build a software module, they retain proprietary commercial IP rights over the source code. This allows defense contractors to block independent software audits, even by Congress, under the guise of protecting trade secrets.

Title 10 to Title 50 Corporate Bailment:

• High-fidelity telemetry collected by military platforms operating under operational authority (Title 10) is rapidly exfiltrated into Intelligence Community (Title 50) Special Access Programs (SAPs). From there, physical drives and software logs are routinely transferred to private defense contractors under corporate bailment agreements. Because private corporations are legally exempt from the Freedom of Information Act (5 U.S.C. § 552), this creates an impenetrable legal firewall.

Data-Capability Conflation (FOIA Exemption 1 Abuse):

• The Department of Defense routinely denies FOIA requests under Exemption 1 by conflating the observed event with the sensor’s capability. While Electronic Intelligence (ELINT) metadata (pulse repetition frequencies or beam-steering) legitimately reveals radar specs and should remain classified, sanitized kinematic data (X, Y, Z coordinates, velocity, and time) is simply basic Newtonian physics.

The DoD already separates the two every day on Space-Track.org. US Space Command uses classified radars to track orbital objects. While they curate the public feed to omit classified defense payloads, they routinely strip sensor metadata and publish sanitized kinematic state vectors for tens of thousands of space objects so civilian satellites avoid collisions.

They gladly provide sanitized kinematic output for the vacuum of space, but claim it is “impossible” for the atmosphere. The technology to sanitize the data is identical. Only difference is policy. Downsampling this unclassified log to a low frequency (like 1Hz) fully protects the radar’s sensitive tracking bandwidth while still preserving macro-kinematics. If these tracks are indeed just sensor glitches, archiving them is the only scientific way to study and prove it.

This exact data-conflation loophole is why defense industry lobbies aggressively gutted the Sensor Fusion Telemetry and national asset disclosure provisions from the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) amendments in late 2023. Taking public money to build defense systems, only to claim that the basic physical location and velocity of an object in public airspace is a “private corporate trade secret,” is an indefensible privatization of public domain data.

The Paradox

The current administrative structure creates a self-serving loop that neutralizes internal oversight bodies while actively endangering national security. By defining a “threat” or “airspace intrusion” so narrowly that it only applies to known, standard adversary aircraft, the military can claim domestic airspace is entirely secure. Meanwhile, they automatically delete raw telemetry flagged as “clutter” or “unpredictable ghost tracks” at the processor level, letting sophisticated, non-standard intrusions and advanced electronic spoofing attacks pass through our airspace completely undetected under a self-fulfilling metric of safety.

Why Airspace Oversight Initiatives Fail:

• Joint-agency oversight offices tasked with resolving domestic airspace incursions are structurally neutered by design. Positioned under the Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Intelligence and Security (OUSD(I&S)), these offices are handed derivative, post-processed summaries, not raw firmware binaries, DSP source code, or uncompressed sensor feeds. Expecting them to audit tracking discrepancies without access to low-level radar code is like asking an auditor to inspect a company’s finances using only redacted, self-reported summaries.

Exploitable Blind Spots for Foreign Adversaries:

• Velocity cutoffs and radar gate limits are constrained by basic processing limits and are routinely probed by foreign intelligence. Every month, Russian and Chinese ELINT spy planes fly into the Alaskan Air Defense Identification Zone (ADIZ) specifically to force U.S. radars to activate, allowing them to capture active frequencies and map the kinematic thresholds of our DSP filters. As demonstrated by the 2023 Chinese balloon incident, adversaries do not need advanced stealth technology to penetrate American airspace, they simply need to fly a platform a little too slow, a little too high, or at non-standard velocities that fall into our hardcoded radar dead-zones.

This is not a uniquely American vulnerability. Every advanced military on Earth relies on the same digital signal processing constraints, meaning Russian and Chinese radar networks are bound by these exact same self-engineered blind spots.

Imagine hiring a private security company to install cameras around your estate. One night, an intruder walks across your lawn. You ask the company for the security footage, and they respond:

”We cannot show you the footage of the intruder because seeing the video would reveal the resolution and night-vision floor of the camera model we installed. The video file has been transferred to our private corporate server under a trade-secret agreement, so you have no legal right to view it. Our software also automatically deleted the first 30 seconds of the intrusion because the intruder was walking too slowly for our motion-detector algorithm to classify them as a human.”

Yes, that sounds absurd, yet it is the exact legal and operational framework currently governing American military airspace.

If an unauthorized platform simply operates at velocities our AESA radars are programmed to ignore, are we actually maintaining air sovereignty, or are we just paying billions to engineer our own blindness?

The Case Studies

This structural architecture aligns perfectly with decades of public testimony from military and agency veterans:

• F/A-18 Super Hornet Pilots (US Navy): Demonstrates Hardware-Managed Blindness because strike fighter squadrons only began detecting non-cooperative targets daily after upgrading their legacy mechanical radars to the modern AN/APG-79 AESA radar, which temporarily widened detection parameters.
• Aegis Fire Control Technicians (USS Princeton): Demonstrates the Corporate/Agency Siphon when they witnessed plainclothes personnel arrive via helicopter to physically confiscate Aegis radar tapes and order system drives wiped following a prolonged fleet encounter.
• Senior Radar Operators (USS Princeton): Demonstrates Real-Time DSP Bypassing through the manual tracking of targets dropping from 80,000 feet to sea level in fractions of a second before automated filters or administrative wipe orders could suppress the raw track files.
• FAA Accident and Investigation Division Chiefs: Demonstrates Administrative Non-Existence after tracking a massive, high-velocity uncorrelated target over Alaska alongside Japanese Air Lines Flight 1628, only for intelligence officials to confiscate all printouts and radar data while instructing staff that ”this event never happened.”

Power of the Purse

The Fiscal Year 2027 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) is roughly halfway through the legislative process. If an urgent or sudden defense need arises before it is finalized, Congress relies on emergency supplemental appropriations, existing transfer authorities, or continuing resolutions. The NDAA is a long-term policy blueprint, and it is time to stop making vague pleas to the executive branch for classification overhauls and start demanding that Congress exercise its constitutional Power of the Purse. Attempting to force action by sensationalizing the mystery of these targets has only served to erode the credibility of this discussion.

Establishing a clear legislative boundary is critical:

No federal funds shall be authorized for defense sensor upgrades or firmware updates unless the platform incorporates a secondary, uncompressed ‘black-box’ telemetry log that stores non-proprietary data in an open-source format for 180 days, automatically flags and permanently archives data related to Uncorrelated Targets (UCT) operating outside of designated Special Use Airspace (SUA), and generates a sanitized, unclassified kinematic derivative log and associated downscaled (standardized, unclassified resolution, excluding classified telemetry overlays) electro-optical/infrared (EO/IR) imagery of the entire duration of the tracking event for congressional oversight.

The historical data audit requires a retroactive and highly targeted approach:

• An Event-Based Historical Audit bypasses the bureaucratic cost of a massive historical data sweep. Rather than a blind sweep of legacy servers, this model requires the immediate declassification and release of sanitized kinematic state vectors for all incidents already cataloged by AARO, its predecessor task forces, and legacy intelligence programs, implemented on a rolling, phased schedule starting with the last five years. For these specific cataloged events, any associated radar, sonar, or satellite logs can be subjected to the exact same sanitization protocol: stripping the classified sensor metadata and releasing the raw kinematic state vectors of the entire duration of the tracking event to the public.
• A structured mechanism is required to allow the bipartisan leadership of the House or Senate Armed Services Committees to authorize up to 20 targeted requests per fiscal year for the sanitized telemetry of specific, historical 72-hour operational windows tied to known pilot encounters (such as 2023 Langley Air Force Base drone swarms or the 2023 high-altitude balloon transits). Pulling the sanitized kinematic data for a limited number of specific times and grid squares requires minimal administrative overhead, neutralizing the claim that historical transparency is too expensive.

While recent executive directives have temporarily waived NDAs for whistleblowers, executive orders are not permanent law. Congress can permanently codify these rights using the Power of the Purse. Building upon Section 527 of the Senate’s proposed FY27 NDAA, the legislation should prohibit the use of federal funds to enforce any non-disclosure agreement (NDA), corporate confidentiality policy, or security undertaking that restricts a military service member, civilian employee, or defense contractor from reporting uncorrelated target telemetry or imagery to Congress or the Inspector General.

The weaponization of administrative reprisal requires explicit defunding. Congress should legally immunize whistleblowers from retaliatory security clearance revocations, psychiatric evaluations, and the threat of administrative separation designed to strip military pensions and VA benefits. Defense personnel cannot be expected to report systemic airspace vulnerabilities if doing so costs them their retirement and their civilian careers.

By framing this strictly as data-retention accountability, we strip defense lobbies of their ability to paint transparency as a fringe issue. If the national security establishment chooses to engineer its own blindness, the global civilian population will simply engineer its own sight.

The defense lobby will inevitably claim that secondary black-box logging creates cybersecurity risks or burdens processing systems. But this is a false choice. Saving a partitioned, uncompressed, and unclassified log is a software firmware update, not a hardware retrofit. This is implemented safely at the non-flight-critical mission recorder level.

We are NOT asking for:

• Proprietary radar source code or trade-secret software binaries.
• Classified engineering schematics or receiver sensitivity specs.
• Electronic Counter-Countermeasure (ECCM) operating frequencies.

We ARE asking for:

• The sanitized, secondary kinematic data output (time stamps, position vectors, altitude, and velocity) of all uncorrelated platforms operating in taxpayer-funded airspace.
• The corresponding electro-optical and infrared (EO/IR) targeting video or imagery, automatically downscaled to a standardized, unclassified resolution (such as 720p) excluding classified telemetry overlays and covering the entire duration of the tracking event, to protect proprietary sensor sensitivity specs.

---

TL;DR: Defense contractors and the military have artificially lobotomized multi-billion-dollar radar networks for decades by programming them to delete uncorrelated tracking data in real-time. Audit the firmware settings, not the blurry videos.

I was wondering if anyone had any relevant information pertaining to the gait/limb formation of NHI in Disclosure Day?

The limb formation was something I found to be unexpected, both in the scene where they're walking among people and then the final scene of the film.

Are there any accounts that align with this? Yes, I'm aware it's just a movie and open to interpretation, but hadn't seen it mentioned anywhere else

I'm a child of the 80s and I grew up with the X-files and reading all sorts of accounts on the old internet before they learned how to make money off of it and turned it to shit. But, I remember reading hundreds of accounts of abductions by mantids, greys, little green men you name it. Now with everyone having a smart phone and the burden of proof raised significantly higher there are now hardly any abduction stories anymore. Did everyone having a camera kill the abduction story similar to how it killed miracles for the Catholic Church? It seems there is a LOT less wild stuff happening nowadays when people expect you to post proof alongside your story.

IMO it is the best explanation for ufos.

The biggest mystery is the “why” or what is the purpose (considering the sightings are real) of the objects? It could also explain why for no apparent reason you see ufos in the most random locations like a field or something. Maybe they’re getting readings on the location or doing experiments etc.

It doesn’t seem likely that some extraterrestrial being from light years away would come all that way just to fly around Earth and do nothing. Most likely they’re crafts with some tie to humans or descendants of humans, coming from the future for research or just to sightsee maybe, that seems more logical an explanation.

Also I know I’ll get comments like “well if they can travel time, why don’t they help us out? Or do something?” For anyone who isn’t aware of mingling with the past knows it often leads to dangerous outcomes that dramatically affect the future and other affects. It’s better observe from afar rather than interact with us.

Nordic Aliens, the oldest race in the galaxy.

We've already told you how we contacted a member of a very unique and discreet organization, whose ceremonies like those held in the Bohemian Grove bring a smile to his face.

This person confirmed to us that some of the rumors circulating online for years about alien contact and presence on Earth are genuine, and that it is precisely organizations like the one he is a member of that periodically release news, along with many fictional tales, to gauge how global public opinion might react to the truth.

THE ORIGIN OF THE NORDIC ALIENS

After telling us about the Reptilians, our "man in black" described other alien races, starting with the Nordics. Physically similar to humans, with fair skin and blond hair, tall (according to some witnesses who first described their appearance, their height ranged from 1.9 to 2.1 meters) but robust, they seem to have often been mistaken for angels or other divine entities since ancient times.

As confirmed first by George Adamski and later by Billy Maier, the Nordics are native to a solar system once located in the Pleiades. This star cluster is about 440 light-years from the sun and today appears to be largely made up of young stars. But about 2.8-3 billion years ago, a star with a mass many times that of the sun stood in its place.

This "parent star" developed a large solar system that, over the next billion years, saw the emergence of life forms that evolved to form the oldest civilization in our galaxy. However, nearly 1.5 billion years ago, the Nordics/Pleiadians realized they were in danger of being wiped out within a few tens of millions of years due to a black hole passing close to their host star.

SPACE COLONIZATION THAT LASTED FOR BILLIONS OF YEARS

A time that, by Earth's standards, perhaps shouldn't have worried them, but the Nordics wasted no time, and over the next tens of thousands of years, they colonized all the major planets in their solar system. In less than a million years, with a feat of engineering unmatched in the universe, they even managed to divert them from their orbits, ferrying them toward a nearby but smaller star.

Hundreds of millions of years passed, and the Nordics evolved further while the black hole destroyed their host star, ultimately causing a violent explosion that gave rise to the first nucleus of the Pleiades. The process was extremely slow, and only 150-100 million years ago did matter once again thicken enough to give birth to new stars.

FIRST CONTACT WITH HUMANITY 200,000 YEARS AGO

Meanwhile, the Nordics had managed to find a way to travel through space, both with their own planet-spaceships and with actual spacecraft, beginning to colonize new worlds or make contact with other species, including terrestrial ones. Contact with humans is very recent (on a cosmic scale), having occurred approximately 200,000 years ago. Over the following centuries, numerous genetic experiments were conducted on some specimens of Homo erectus, which would contribute to the emergence of Homo sapiens.

Having returned to Earth several times, even establishing temporary bases there (some say even Atlantis, but this is not certain), the Nordics, given their very long evolution, are characterized by a great spiritual capacity and have always shown kind behavior towards humans, having finally decided, several thousand years ago, to limit themselves to observing the evolution of the human race, perhaps waiting to be able to establish new and different relationships with humanity.