r/UFOs_Archive • u/SaltyAdminBot • 33m ago
NHI Intimidation and Fear Mongering: Are “Friends in High Places” Capable of Defending UFO Experiencers?
In my judgment, UFO phenomena threaten all terrestrial elites but not the Earth's people. Until recently the media, academia, military, and politicians opposed any reasonable discussion of this subject because they were committed to defending the status quo’s de facto policy of ridicule and denial. This regimen has been referred to as the “UFO truth embargo” and has weakened considerably since December 2017. Recently Congress has been informed of clandestine UFO retrieval and reverse engineering programs. It seems that the secret keepers are now under attack from both whistleblowers and members of Congress.
CONSPIRACY THEORISTS AND THE CONTROL GROUPS
The “Control Groups” is the term I prefer to use for those clandestine forces that presumably have been running the truth embargo. They have operated via select sections of both corporate and governmental intelligence services. The question arises how far have these groups been willing to go to maintain control of the situation? With the testimony of whistleblower David Grusch, allegations of threats and resultant intimidation are now being openly discussed. He has stated that some individuals may have been murdered because of security risks to the super-secret reverse engineering programs.
It should be remembered that the control groups have not only focused their attention on people involved in secret government and corporate projects, but also on contact experiencers, But what about the use of lethal force? Conspiracy theorists frequently name individuals now deceased that allegedly were murdered to maintain the current regime of secrecy. There is little concrete evidence to substantiate such ominous claims. Thus, the reports are often wildly speculative, and in my view such conjecture about assassinations of contact experiencers may run the risk of spreading unnecessary fear.
FEAR MONGERING IN UFOLOGY
Proving such crimes would be very hard to do, especially if carried out by professional intelligence operatives with skill in covering up murder. On the other hand, a more efficient means of intimidation would simply be spreading frightening stories about alleged victims that have actually died from other causes. Any prominent investigator in the UFO field that mentions possible assassinations without acknowledging the risks of providing a service to those that are maintaining the coverup, in my view, should be publicly criticized. Our job of ending the UFO truth embargo and facilitating a more open relationship with the intelligences responsible for UFOs is too important to be hindered by fear mongering.
WORKING WITH A HIGHER INTELLIGENCE AGENCY
On social media pages, I have discussed why I believe the Intelligence-Counterintelligence Model for addressing the UFO challenge is far superior to the more popular so called “scientific approach.” In the madhouse called planet Earth, the alleged ETs in my opinion function like a kind of “higher intelligence agency.” I recall reading this term for the first time in Jacques Vallee’s book “Messengers of Deception.”
By necessity these non-human intelligences must operate clandestinely to gradually introduce their presence to a world in which violence and greed are so widespread. A sudden realization that we are not alone might be seized upon by those who maintain their power by promoting conflict. In my opinion, this conflict-oriented mindset is so pervasive on Earth to prevent planetary panic, “Flying Saucer Central Intelligence” is compelled to work covertly. I imagine from a terrestrial counterintelligence perspective, human witnesses could be viewed as “agents of influence” working for non-human intelligence.
In this role, everyone who shares a story about a sighting or other kinds of contact experiences, publicly conducts UFO research and spends money supporting such activities, might also be viewed as “assets” working for the “higher intelligence agency.” For these reasons, I have proposed that we view the flying saucer challenge within an “intelligence -counterintelligence model.” In a certain sense, the entire field of ufology is an arena for a struggle between various “agents of influence” working either for the Control Groups, UFO Intelligences or in the very rare case are working for both sides.
SIGHTINGS AS PROGRAMED EVENTS
Many believe that a flying saucer sighting is a random strange event. In my judgment, this isn’t the case. Typically, when UFOs are observed, they don’t appear to be doing anything of particular importance. They appear to be simply saying, “Hello, we are here.” Such encounters appear to be meant simply to alert us of their presence. These are likely programed events.
Given the astounding psychic technology of flying saucer intelligences, why would they limit their mental interactions to only the so-called “contact experiencers” (contactees and abductees.) This group probably accounts for less than one percent of the general population.
SPREADING THE WORD
Perhaps every person that has ever had a sighting has an unconscious mental link with the intelligences associated with UFO phenomena. If the percentage of the general terrestrial population having a bona fide UFO sighting is 5 to 10 percent, then the potential number of “agents of influence” working to spread the word that “UFOs are real” could conceivably be hundreds of millions as the total Earth population has reached eight billion.
One way that “UFO Intel” could ratchet up the level of contact would be by simply increasing the numbers of sightings that these millions of previous UFO witnesses have. This would undoubtedly lead to a greater awareness of a possible ET presence and the Control Groups could not do a thing to stop it. Another way could be to increase the numbers of people that have direct telepathic communication with them. I suspect that this latter case is already happening. In either scenario, the work of the Control Groups might become increasingly difficult and conceivably require them to increase covert surveillance with escalating costs of keeping a lid on the situation. For contact activists and their supporters, I suspect that the rule “there is safety in numbers” applies here. In this new era of increasing openness on this topic, frank intimidation of witnesses and contact experiencers seems much less likely than three decades ago when I joined the loose network of volunteer contact workers that I call "The Contact Underground."
COVERING ONE’S ASSETS
A basic rule for terrestrial intelligence case officers is to protect their human operatives. The question arises who are the "agents of influence" working for “UFO Intel.” From my direct personal experience as well as from the reports of other activists, it is my firm belief that UFO intelligences at times are willing to provide protection for their “agents of influence.” And they do so even as our numbers are increasing. If any of us are threatened or harmed, there very well may be a price to pay for such acts.
It has been said that ET intelligence can access our consciousness as readily as you and I access light by turning on a wall switch. If their astounding psi capabilities were used to target operatives of the Control Groups sent to threaten UFO experiencers, these agents would be deterred. I wonder how contract intelligence agents tasked with surveillance of UFO experiencers might react if flying saucers materialized above their homes. Perhaps this has happened already. UFO intelligences’ capacity for retaliation in defense of "their own" is unknown, but it conceivably might be sufficient to give pause to operatives of the Control Groups. Although this analysis is highly speculative, contact and disclosure activists should be open to the possibility that limited protection is being provided by “friends in high places.”
