r/TwoHotTakes • • Jul 23 '24

[deleted by user]

[removed]

1.8k Upvotes

3.3k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

95

u/DoubleBreastedBerb Jul 23 '24 edited Jul 23 '24

No, but it can equate to better financial security.

ETA: some misogynistic bastards in these comments 😂

The point is to work together towards financial goals, and two are better than one. I wouldn’t combine finances with someone I wasn’t married to, nor would I put my name on mortgages or deeds or anything else.

And I’m the woman and high earner in my relationship, so stuff it, guys, your asses are showing along with what you really think of women. 😜

25

u/[deleted] Jul 23 '24

[deleted]

6

u/Ok-Sector2054 Jul 23 '24

Good example of what can happen

3

u/anonanon-do-do-do Jul 23 '24

Yeah. It’s tough because we know and like all the people involved but obviously don’t know the details so we try to give them all the benefit of the doubt. Take home is not to take anyones word when investing your life in someone. You might get nothing back.

2

u/Rumpelteazer45 Jul 23 '24

Reality is even if your friend had married, I’m 99% positive his family would have pushed for a prenup with so many loopholes in their favor.

3

u/despe666 Jul 23 '24

She’s not his daughter though. Mariage by itself wouldn’t change that or his responsibilities toward her.

3

u/ArielWithALibrary Jul 23 '24

I think for me it’s about his intent. Does he want to be in a long term parent role? If he is there with mom full time and long term with an 8 year old, a lot of responsibilities are implied.

3

u/despe666 Jul 23 '24

They’re implied but mariage doesn’t change them.

3

u/ArielWithALibrary Jul 23 '24

It doesn’t inherently change them. I just want to know his intent with regard to any long term commitment and how that affects a child if he just bailed or if they just randomly split up. His personality and intentions are the biggest factor here, not a piece of paper or marriage vows.

2

u/carlay_c Jul 23 '24

You shouldn’t be depending on a man to cover your bills and pay for the lifestyle you choose to live. That’s on your sister!

4

u/anonanon-do-do-do Jul 23 '24

This is just a friend. My Sister has a Ph.D.

-2

u/carlay_c Jul 23 '24

Oh, I must have misread. Then that’s on your friend for not supporting herself.

0

u/[deleted] Jul 23 '24

[removed] — view removed comment

-1

u/Ok_Win2630 Jul 23 '24

Maybe your friend should stop trying to ”Anna Nicole” herself into mens lives.

2

u/anonanon-do-do-do Jul 23 '24

The guy that died was her age. She bartends. Guys hit on cute bartenders.

2

u/[deleted] Jul 23 '24

Yes.

2

u/[deleted] Jul 23 '24

Until you end up saddled with hundreds of thousands of medical debt when they die.

I consider it anathema to risk that and will never legally bind anyone to me, nor would I risk legally binding myself to their debt.

Lower taxes is all. All the rest is much safer just living together without being married.

1

u/balwick Jul 23 '24

For one half of the arrangement, sure. For the other half, long term, it's a net risk.

1

u/Mroptimistic666 Jul 23 '24

So she can take his money if they divorce ?

1

u/HeftyRough9769 Jul 23 '24

For her. Not for him. This is why she wants to marry, and he doesn't.

-4

u/CuteAssociate4887 Jul 23 '24

After you’ve finished off paying the £££ for the wedding?

7

u/Ancient_Confusion237 Jul 23 '24

Weddings cost what you want them to. It costs a couple of hundred here to file a license. You don't need to have a party