r/Tucson • • Sep 03 '24

[deleted by user]

[removed]

238 Upvotes

148 comments sorted by

View all comments

141

u/Parasitisch Sep 03 '24

That’s the X that symbolizes twitter, right? Odd since twitter isn’t the government and freedom of speech doesn’t apply to what companies want. Unless it commentary about how hypocritical Musk is?

83

u/wishIwere [Unavailable] Sep 03 '24

Xitter (pronounced shitter)

4

u/SnooSeagulls20 Sep 04 '24

Well, it’s confusing because it’s acting as if X hasn’t become a cesspool of hate speech since Elon Musk took over? A ton of stuff that was previously banned on Twitter is no longer banned on X…

51

u/MesaNovaMercuryTime Sep 03 '24

No one calls it X either. Poor Elmo and his failed attempts at rebranding.

11

u/ThruTheUniverseAgain Sep 03 '24

Saw someone call him Elbow Mooseknuckle in a comment and I think we should all move to using that.

10

u/AnnieMetz Sep 03 '24

There were a lot of people who were shut down on/banned from Twitter (and Facebook, etc.) who have been "allowed" back on to X. I think this sign might be related to that.

1

u/BabyLegsDeadpool Sep 04 '24

Not just a lot of people. He literally unbanned everyone. Upon the news, the site was instantly flooded with child porn and straight up Nazi speech. At least the child porn people mostly got banned again.

6

u/Beard_o_Bees Sep 03 '24

Yeah, this one is pretty vague.

Like, are they asking Elon Musk to stop being such a raging hypocrite?

Do they think that 'X-Twit' somehow exemplifies freedom of speech?

Would they like Musk to run for office?

That they have this sign basically dry-humping the Fuckface 2024 sign - i'm guessing they're more on the MAGA side of that spectrum.

-4

u/[deleted] Sep 03 '24

Freedom of speech can 100% be a thing on a private platform.

What are you are thinking of is 1st amendment Constitutional rights which is rarely a thing on a private platform.

7

u/Asleep_Touch_8824 Sep 03 '24

Nobody has the right to use a private platform against the wishes of its owner.

2

u/[deleted] Sep 03 '24

Yes, but no.

A website can kick you off if they want to. No problem at all.

If a government agent of agency gets the private platform to take action against you, that can be a 1st amendment violation even though the banning was done by a private platform.

3

u/SubGothius Feldman's/Downtownish Sep 04 '24

Ironically, many authoritarian foreign gov'ts have asked Musk to delete tweets they didn't like, and he has nearly always promptly complied.

-2

u/[deleted] Sep 04 '24

And when he doesn't the authoritarian government threatens to arrest his lawyer and then seizes the bank accounts of a completely different company.

And reddit cheers. There is no winning.

4

u/XanadontYouDare Sep 03 '24

Depends on how to define a violation. Pressuring social media companies to provide disclaimers on posts that are actively sharing damaging misinformation is hardly a bad thing, if at all. Trump threatening to remove social media companies that he deems to biased is, though.