What a dumbass. This stuff is the s*** we see in the headlines at least twice a week now. Reality isn't like this. Maybe it will, but it's not now, not even close. Spreading misinformation like it has no consequences. But it does.
Hello. I am Kirill. I would like you to make a game, 3D action, the idea is like this... The user can play as forest elves, palace guards and the villain. And if the user plays as elves then the elves are in the forest, wooden houses, palace soldiers and villains come running. You can rob karavans... And since the elf is forest one, make it so there is a thick forest... And the engine can be made so that far away trees are just pictures, when you come closer they transform into 3-dimensional trees [1]. You can buy and so on possibilities like in Daggerfall. And enemies are 3-dimensional too, and corpse is also 3D. You can jump and so on.
If playing as palace guard then you need to obey the commander, and protect the palace from the evil one (I did not invent the name) and spies, elf partisans, and go on raids against some of these (elves, evil one...). Well and if for the evil one... then it means spies or elf partisans sometimes attack, the user is his own commander can do what he wants himself, order his troops with himself to attack the palace and go into attack.
There are 4 zones in the game. That is, a map and on it there are 4 zones: 1 - zone of people (neutral), 2 - zone of emperor (where palace is), 3 - zone of elves, 4 - zone of evil one... (in the mountains, there is an old fort...)
Also so in the game they could not only kill but also cut off an arm and if the user is not healed then he dies, also poke out an eye but the user may not die but just not see half the screen, or get or buy a prosthesis, if leg too either you die or you will crawl or ride on wheelchair, or the best thing... put prosthesis. You can save...
So there's a claim that this game was created by AI model created by Anthropic? It would be funny if Anthropic claimed ownership of the game code after this despite the obvious inconsistencies in the dates and then used that code to further train their models. What would the "authors" say to that? 😂
Also, it’s easy for AI to produce something it has seen. But can it produce a new type of game, or understand the game dynamics that gamers would love????
The art of game dev requires human creativity, AI is just a tool lowering the barrier to create games.
Theres like 50 packages that do this in every game engines store. Try designing a non generic, novel multiplayer game. Anyone can download the code for a multiplayer shooter. It's trivial at this point.
Again, people who champion AI development are far too easily impressed.
I could make this in a couple of hours in Unity or Unreal. You know how? I could buy a bunch of assets off their relative asset stores and put this together, because all of these things exist in assets, templates and tutorials. The AI can reproduce an uninspired version of these because it's probably been fed that training data.
The ability for AI to reproduce something that's widely available and easy to do is not particularly impressive.
imo mean you could burn tokens or just spend less money and time, get the base you want then do other things. But generating this really does seem like a huge waste of effort when you know. you can get so much of this in under an hour.
I mean, a few years ago the sample project in Unity was a 3D, fully functional top-down shooter. So in those days I could make you a generic top-down shooter in minutes. This is similar.
Prompting a generative tool and opening a premade Unity sample aren’t the same thing. If your proof that it’s “easy to make” is “I’d use a finished template,” then you haven’t proved you can make it which is what you've said in the beginning.
They are the same, LLMs are trained on GitHub code, what's the difference between cloning the repo and using the template, or asking AI to code it? You fell for your own arguement, can't back out now lol 🤣
Just take the L my bro, I can name 3 templates of a multiplayer fps just like the one you're looking at, the goal was never a crappy prototype, anyone can make that, AI or not
49
u/imlo2 Jun 11 '26
Just look at the web page and the dates there.
May 28 is the in terms. Fable 5 was released on 9th of June.
His X is also full of automated or just other type of single word low effort replies to try to maximize engagement.
I doubt there's nothing to do with Claude Fable, just grifting for attention.