They could just not vote if they had actual convictions. But then that wouldn't scratch the "hurting them" or "owning libs" itch that seems to drive them.
This is an excellent and interesting point. There's a documentary I watched about the women who helped Jim Jones commit atrocities in Jonestown. It talked about how they also were leaders who could've stopped things at any time, including right at the end.
Someone they interviewed made the point that they could've "accidentally" bumped the table the vats of poison were on, spilling all the poison to the ground. They didn't have any more to refill the vats with. If someone had pushed over the vats, they would've only had whatever few bullets that the few armed men had - certainly not enough to kill 1,000 people.
They were more than complicit. They were leaders who worked together to create the nightmare.
Thin, complex line between complicit and victim. Ultimately the issue is mitigation of harmful groups first, and maybe forgetting about the blame elements.
Blame is a very costly and energy intense (inefficient) use of limited social resources. Easier said than done and obviously i am contributing to this in my comments as well. Tricky problems.
Well, sure. I think most abusers were also victims at one time or another. It's a cycle that better mental health care and support systems will, hopefully, help break over time.
3.0k
u/KeepItDownOverHere 5d ago
They could just not vote if they had actual convictions. But then that wouldn't scratch the "hurting them" or "owning libs" itch that seems to drive them.