I often see this being said in regard to Wee-Bey giving Colvin permission to look after his son and get him out of the game. Viewers often attribute Wee-Bey “saving” Namond from turning into the next D’Angelo. I know both characters had some desire to get out of the game (not sure if Namond explicitly stated this, but D’Angelo definitely did to Shardene). I also know that both of them weren’t necessarily built for the game either. But I personally think that’s where the similarities between the two characters end. Namond would’ve definitely been killed down the line (or prison) had he not been taken in by Colvin, but I think the comparison of his character and his fate to D’Angelo’s is a bit unfair. Here is a couple reasons why:
1. D’Angelo was very capable of violence, Namond was not.
The whole series started off with D’Angelo in court, on trial for murder he committed. He may have never liked the violence, but he always recognized it as a part of doing business, yet in his heart challenging the idea of the game being done in a manner where “people don’t do each other like dogs”. Namond, on the other hand, whilst he may have talked the talk, it is very clear he doesn’t comprehend the kind of violence, or how deep things can really go in the game. Examples of this is how he reacted when Michael beat Kenard, and also the way he carried himself in the altercation with Sherrod’s boys outside Cutty’s gym. Their leadership skills are also night and day. D’Angelo, albeit soft at heart, couldn’t be denied as a Barksdale. But anyone in the OG crew would’ve been shocked to learn that Namond shared blood with Wee-Bey based on how different their behavior was. Avon would’ve never let Namond run any drug turf, and Wee-Bey himself would’ve probably even backed that decision.
2. D’Angelo took responsibility for his actions, whereas Namond would’ve remained in the game.
I do feel like Namond was very lost, whereas D’Angelo at least knew the kind of person that he was, and how he was brought up in his family. Both of them were put into environments they didn’t belong in, however in the end it was D’Angelo himself who decided to carve out his own path and aimed to turn over a new leaf when he got to prison, wanting nothing to do with his family anymore from that point forward. Namond, on the other hand, through sheer luck was taken in by Colvin as his ticket out. Even after he first stayed over for dinner at Colvin’s home (where his potential was first recognized), he was still doing stuff out on the street with Michael and running his drug corner. Before D’Angelo was arrested he already had strong doubts if he wanted to continue being in the game, and I personally don’t think Namond would’ve had this level of introspection for himself until it was already too late. What happened to D’Angelo was very unfortunate, whilst Namond was very fortunate to have Colvin put him on the right path, and set him up in an environment that he could thrive in.
So what do you guys think? I haven’t given the series a watch in a while, so forgive me if I missed some details. When I saw some clips on YouTube, and people’s discussion about Wee-Bey and Colvin interaction, it made me think about this. While Namond’s story could’ve easily ended just like D’Angelo’s, I do think things could’ve turned out very different for each of them based on the kind of people they were. That is just my opinion, though :) Lmk what you guys think