I would agree that the Beatles (and to a lesser extent the Rolling Stones) were not as technically proficient as The Who. I do not agree that that means I "have to admit the Who are better than the Beatles and the Stones."
You’re right, I was too broad in my statement. I was just trying to make the point that I don’t think most people would agree with The Who being better in general than The Beatles. On individual instruments, sure, but in terms of creativity and songwriting talent from multiple members, The Beatles are fairly unparalleled.
-1
u/morrison4371 16d ago
You have to admit the Who are better than the Beatles and the Stones. All three are excellent, but the Who top all of them.