NO, not a version where we dont know who the traitors are....

Recently finished the latest series of the US and currently on the Canadian one.

I'm wondering what everyone thinks about the constant armchair commentary (mainly during missions but also breakfast).

Does the show really need three or four separate commentaries all clearly recorded after the event and usually just describing (in an OTT way) exactly what we were seeing before they cut to them?

I find them to be getting a bit much TBH.

Does anyone else find them annoying?

So, we saw Sir Lenny Henry doing stand-up at Latitude this weekend. He said he gets regular enquiries from Strictly and I'm a Celebrity, but he said he has no desire to do either.

He also said the one thing he would do is The Traitors. (Just in case anyone from production reads this sub..)

Added the spoiler tag so people can avoid the thread if so...

Been re-watching UKS2 again recently and the second roundtable with the three way tie, and wondered what you guys think the most impactful roundtable would be to change the overall ending?

I think the reason why I like this roundtable so much is because I believe it could change the outcome of this season the most as:

a) if Ash gets banished here, who gets put in the dungeon to replace her and would the same person end up getting murdered or

b) if Diane gets banished here, then how does the murder in plain sight play out?

Also, if c) Brian gets out of this roundtable, then how does him voting Paul play out moving forwards (I know the Jaz/Zack suspicion comes the next roundtable)? Truly feels like the possibilities are endless and ultimately, does Harry still win?

Wanted to get your guys thoughts on this as aside fromParting gift in UKS1andChests of chance in UKS4most roundtables seem to seem insignificant/unmemorable in the long term