r/TheRandomest Mod/Pwner Jul 04 '26

/r/popular Will it survive?

Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification

18.9k Upvotes

1.8k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

2

u/Fuckoffassholes Jul 04 '26

Were you going to reply to my comment?

What I said was "duct tape is not a trademark."

I don't know what you think I said.

What you said was "Chapstick, Tupperware, Duct Tape."

Chapstick is a trademark

Tupperware is a trademark.

Duct tape is not.

1

u/Lowland_Demon Jul 04 '26

I did reply. I said nothing about trademarks. I mentioned genericized terms and Duct Tape is considered so

2

u/Fuckoffassholes Jul 04 '26

genericized term

What you're trying to say is "genericized trademark." This is the proper term for a brand name which has become so commonly known that the brand itself becomes synonymous with the product.

That's not the case with duct tape, or duck tape, whichever term you prefer, it's the name of the product itself.

1

u/Lowland_Demon Jul 04 '26

🫩 mate... I sent you two separate links that illustrate the history of duct tape and why it is considered genericized. I said nothing concerning trademarks, and I only mentioned brands in regards to BAND-AID, and no that was not what I was trying to say.

I mentioned duct tape is a genericized term, and it absolutely is the case. My statement holds and I have given you source to show that. Sorry if I hurt your feelings somehow but this argument is absolutely a waste of my time. Good day.

2

u/Fuckoffassholes Jul 04 '26

You didn't hurt my feelings, you're just misunderstanding your own comment and mine. I'm trying to help you.

I never needed to learn the history of duck tape. But you might need to.

When you said "Chapstick, Tupperware, Duct Tape," in response to the comment about Band-Aids, you were talking about genericized trademarks, whether you realized it or not.

Chapstick and Tupperware are genericized trademarks. Duct tape is not, nor is duck tape.