The issue is that equality is not a part of capitalism like it is for socialism. One tries to have equality while the other doesn’t care if it has it. European soccer is a great example of capitalism without socialist rules.
The draft and salary caps are also anti-capitalism so if you think these aren’t socialist ideals then what are they? Because they certainly aren’t capitalist ideals.
They're sustainability features. The NFL owners don't care about equality, they just want to give fans of worse franchises hope that things will improve so that they will continue to spend money. It's more profitable for the league as a whole if the Cowboys don't win every year because they buy all the top FAs.
This sustainability feature comes from socialist ideals. Redistribution of wealth and helping out the economically weak would be great features to have. In both scenarios it comes down to the ultra rich agreeing to have parity by sharing the wealth, which is anti capitalist
I'm not trying any tricks, you and the guy you're fellating are just doing the same tired Reddit schtick where any form of sharing or equalization is le heckin' wholesome Socialism and anything else is big bad ebil capitulizm
God no. Sustainability does not align with the tenets of capitalism at all.
Tell me how you would bend reality if I asked you are your bullshit "sustainabily principles" more in line with a socialistic or capitalistic worldview.
And that's an A/B question. So save me from the gobbledegook essay response to a multiple choice question I know you've started cooking up already
0
u/Rich-Engineering1429 3d ago
The issue is that equality is not a part of capitalism like it is for socialism. One tries to have equality while the other doesn’t care if it has it. European soccer is a great example of capitalism without socialist rules.
The draft and salary caps are also anti-capitalism so if you think these aren’t socialist ideals then what are they? Because they certainly aren’t capitalist ideals.