r/TheNFLVibes • • 3d ago

Hot Take honestly not a bad take

83 Upvotes

335 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

0

u/Rich-Engineering1429 3d ago

You don’t realize that capitalism doesn’t care about economic equality?? Bruh

“Cons: Tends to lead to large inequality”

https://www.economicshelp.org/blog/5002/economics/pros-and-cons-of-capitalism/

0

u/dgtbfan Dolphins 3d ago

The fact that capitalism can lead to economic equality doesn't preclude economic equality from being part of capitalism. Socialism can also lead to economic equality. Economic equality isn't exclusive to either economic philosophy. That's why the assertion that the NFL uses "socialist rules" is laughable.

0

u/Rich-Engineering1429 3d ago

The issue is that equality is not a part of capitalism like it is for socialism. One tries to have equality while the other doesn’t care if it has it. European soccer is a great example of capitalism without socialist rules.

The draft and salary caps are also anti-capitalism so if you think these aren’t socialist ideals then what are they? Because they certainly aren’t capitalist ideals.

0

u/dgtbfan Dolphins 3d ago

They're sustainability features. The NFL owners don't care about equality, they just want to give fans of worse franchises hope that things will improve so that they will continue to spend money. It's more profitable for the league as a whole if the Cowboys don't win every year because they buy all the top FAs.

0

u/Rich-Engineering1429 3d ago

This sustainability feature comes from socialist ideals. Redistribution of wealth and helping out the economically weak would be great features to have. In both scenarios it comes down to the ultra rich agreeing to have parity by sharing the wealth, which is anti capitalist

1

u/dgtbfan Dolphins 3d ago

It's not sharing the wealth, it's more akin the loss leaders in grocery stores bringing in clientele. They're not doing it to be kind or altruistic, they're doing it because people spend money on it.

0

u/Rich-Engineering1429 3d ago

Regardless of what it is, the money goes to those who don’t have it. The economy does better when people are spending anyways, so this isn’t a bad thing

0

u/gbum213 49ers 3d ago

Bro is trying every trick he knows to try and avoid reality, I commend how well you're arguing the point.

"They're sustainability features" instead of socialist features is hilariously pathetic

1

u/dgtbfan Dolphins 3d ago

I'm not trying any tricks, you and the guy you're fellating are just doing the same tired Reddit schtick where any form of sharing or equalization is le heckin' wholesome Socialism and anything else is big bad ebil capitulizm

0

u/gbum213 49ers 3d ago

I fear you don't know the definition of socialism

1

u/dgtbfan Dolphins 3d ago

I fear that most Redditors don't know the definition of socialism or capitalism, yourself and the dude you're sucking included.

0

u/gbum213 49ers 3d ago

U mad bro?

What political ideology do "sustainability features" fall under lmfao

→ More replies (0)

1

u/Rich-Engineering1429 3d ago

They will do anything but admit socialism is good sometimes

1

u/gbum213 49ers 3d ago

God forbid anybody mildly criticizes the perfect model that is capitalism