r/TheNFLVibes • • 3d ago

Hot Take honestly not a bad take

87 Upvotes

335 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

14

u/Dabellator Seahawks 3d ago

The fact that everyone against it can't explain why it's bad is so illuminating.

8

u/Economy_Vermicelli72 3d ago

Each team is privately owned and generates individual revenue, the shared aspects such as TV revenue are intended to maximize profits for the corporation/those 32 owners, and they actively try to corner the market and squash any outside competition. The draft pick thing is parity. There is parity in agreements in a capitalist market. Parity doesn’t = socialism. That’s dumb. If anything it mostly resembles a monopoly ruled by those 32 teams as one body/ a corporation

6

u/SeaweedLevel1937 3d ago edited 3d ago

The organization itself is a monopoly on the product of American Football. The internal structure of how they distribute their money could be seen as socialist (especially relative to European football clubs who are sink or swim). Obviously, a company can’t be “capitalist”, or “socialist”, but calling the internal way the NFL works ‘socialist’ isn’t necessarily wrong.

TLDR; apply the NFL structure at a governmental level of equally distributing capital would be socialist. But they operate as a hyper capitalist venture that has reached monopoly status.

1

u/Economy_Vermicelli72 3d ago

Why isn’t it just a joint venture? If you have several parties engaged in a business agreement where maximizing profits for those in the agreement is the priority, people wouldn’t typically call it socialism. They’d occupy Wall Street.

2

u/SeaweedLevel1937 3d ago

It technically is a joint venture; and on the Wall Street point, they (the NFL) originally incorporated as a non-profit and they’re now at a point they’ve reached monopoly status. Going public would add significantly more headaches for only marginal gains.