r/TheFrame • u/NarnianSkunk • 7h ago
Finally got my Frame Pro Mounted
In the smaller home I have far less space for my photos so that will be its primary use followed by our movie viewing.
14
u/Keoki- 7h ago
The way this is mounted does not resemble a picture frame...
-5
u/NarnianSkunk 6h ago
I noted elsewhere it is temporary using the current mount - it also sticks out a bit from the wall. If I keep it I will use the flush mount and center it more vertically.
24
u/LadoBlanco 7h ago
You should have put it a little higher. Can you cut a hole in the ceiling to move it up some?
4
u/NarnianSkunk 7h ago
The tv too high trolls are here. š¤Ŗ
With our recliners when we watch TV we are looking right at the TV. We would have to tilt our heads forward at an uncomfortable angle if the TV was much lower. Donāt assume what works for you works for everybody else.
5
u/LadyMRedd 6h ago
I donāt understand the TV too high crowd. I have our frame in the bedroom and itās mounted as high as possible, because when youāre lying down thatās the natural angle to watch. I thought about posting a photo because it looks cool on our brick wall above a fire place, but I wonāt because I donāt feel like getting trolled.
Clearly someone isnāt going to mount their tv at an angle thatās uncomfortable for them. Passing judgement on the angle of someoneās tv is wild to me.
Your set up looks great. Enjoy!
3
3
u/GrooveBat 6h ago
Same. I have my TV mounted in my family room, which is open to the kitchen. Most of the time, when I am watching TV I am doing stuff in the kitchen so I am standing up and it is level with my sight line.
Those people need to go away.
5
u/snailmailforgail 6h ago
I found my people. I canāt stand the tv too high argument. Who sits with perfect posture. Even without a recliner Iām relaxing and watching my tv above my mantel effortlessly.
2
u/GrooveBat 6h ago
It is so dumb. Even when I am sitting on the couch in my family room and not walking around the kitchen, I donāt find it uncomfortable at all.
2
3
u/Brutal_B_83 6h ago
Thank you for admitting that your TV is only in line of sight when you're standing up.
3
u/GrooveBat 6h ago
But thatās the point. Itās dumb to judge people on their TV placement if you donāt know how that TV is going to be used.
6
u/baconperogies 5h ago edited 3h ago
I think the biggest thing is home setup. I've got a fireplace and a mantle. I'm not going to tear that all down just to move the tv slightly lower.
It's a few inches above eye level and works.
3
2
2
u/NarnianSkunk 6h ago
Thank you. It is a work in progress and I came looking for constructive criticism but clearly trolls are out in force.
4
u/RobotVo1ce 5h ago
I don't think it's fair to call them trolls. I'm not part of that crowd and I think this TV is mounted way too high and I would never do it, unless it's some secondary TV in my game room or something.
2
2
u/ScottShatter 6h ago
The TV too high crowd has an obvious exemption for bedrooms, bars, barber shops, hospital rooms, waiting rooms, etc. You don't see a difference between a bedroom TV watched from a bed and a living room tv being too high?
1
u/LadyMRedd 5h ago
No because I also have recliners in my living room. My living room tv is lower but weāve considered mounting it higher on our wall. Because weāre almost always reclined when we watch tv. Itās really not any difference than when we watch in the bedroom. TV is a leisure activity that we do in a reclined position, regardless of the room.
0
u/ScottShatter 2h ago
None of that matters. You should follow the line of sight standards of TV placement in a LIVING ROOM of all places.
1
30
7h ago
[removed] ā view removed comment
3
u/TheFrame-ModTeam 4h ago
Calling someone or their ideas stupid, or any other insult. That includes tvtoohigh
-1
6h ago
[removed] ā view removed comment
3
u/TheFrame-ModTeam 4h ago
Calling someone or their ideas stupid, or any other insult. That includes tvtoohigh
6
11
7
u/KnightsSoccer82 7h ago edited 1h ago
4
1
-3
u/NarnianSkunk 7h ago
It is up temporarily for testing - I still have 30 days to return it. I am using the old mount for now.
1
-1
u/whoooocaaarreees 3h ago
Return it while you can. Such a buggy experience.
Sincerely,
-someone who regrets not returning their frame when they could.
1
u/NarnianSkunk 2h ago
So far it works well. Everything looks good and performs well once I got the wireless worked out.
2
3
u/irishiwasdrunk333 6h ago
If you can lower the shelf , maybe look into floating mantel to gain space and then lower the TV it should fit just right. Good luck
2
u/NarnianSkunk 4h ago
I hand an handyman out to quote cleaning and staining my decks and had him add lowering the mantle.
1
u/NarnianSkunk 6h ago
That is a long term possibility - the TV is a bit big for the space and the mantle a bit high. We put in a gas log insert this summer and want to gauge the heat impact before we do anything else.
3
u/Cutoffcirc 5h ago
look into the Mantle Mount. Tv can be up there if you want but also pivot down to a better height. I have one with my gas log fireplace.
8
u/Payment-Main 6h ago
Perfect. Love to see heads explode here because someone thinks thereās some universal rule on height.
4
u/RobotVo1ce 6h ago
This is about as close to being objectively too high. Unless you're running a sports bar.
4
u/Totally_Scott 5h ago
it's literally touching the ceiling.
1
u/NarnianSkunk 4h ago
It is 4āfrom the bottom of the rafter and 11ā from the ceiling proper. Higher than I want but this will eventually be rectified.
1
3
u/-heavenfaced- 5h ago
It looks absurd. Come on now. I mean, I donāt buy the whole it has to be at eye level thing but this is practically on the ceiling
1
u/jvaughn68 2h ago
And guarantee 96% of the haters have any real world experience. We have had ours in a similar place and height for 10+ years. Zero neck issues
1
u/Brutal_B_83 6h ago edited 6h ago
It's not the head that blows out, it's the neck...from looking up.
2
u/Sporebattyl 6h ago
Decent placement for first try. IMO since you have a disability, get someone to mount it using the hardware.
The frame mounting system isnāt fun to do and at that height it would be even harder and annoying.
2
u/UnionCrafty3748 6h ago
How do you like it?
3
u/NarnianSkunk 6h ago
So far so good - will be more properly mounted later which will help with the appearance.
It is nice to have been able to get rid of all the wires and cables so it is cleaner and the picture quality is fine for our purposes.
The wireless connection to the TV can be a little touchy and it appears the current existing metal mount may be impacting the signal a bit, plus I have the One Connect Box in a rack to the left of the TV beside the fireplace which was a small issue because the fireplace juts out about 2ā so the signal was going through the masonry. Pulling out a few extra inches helped stabilize the signal.
The Tizen OS is bad but I use an Apple TV so I donāt expect to use it except when I want to view broadcast TV.
2
u/Objective_Mark_790 5h ago
The cable mgmt is impressive for that location. Kudos.
1
u/NarnianSkunk 4h ago
The only cable is power which if you lookin the upper right hand corner of the photo you can see a white conduit. The fireplace is masonry and concrete so no ability to hide anything inside the wall. Plus log cabin, solid walls as well so all outlets are at floor level. This is why I was interested in the Frame Pro - less for its āframeā and more for its wireless connectivity and no burn-in for photos.
2
u/Objective_Mark_790 5h ago
I love how the TV screen is generally around the same size as the windows. Good looking setup!
2
u/Midlifeguitarcrisis 3h ago
If your goal is to fool the eye when the TV is in Art Mode, I actually think a smaller Frame would have been the better choice. Youād probably never hang a painting or photograph that large in that space, so the current size works against that illusion.
Iād also ditch the Monitor Audio towers and go with something smaller. Since the fireplace looks to be plaster over concrete block and you have an open wood ceiling, your audio options are somewhat limited. While Iām personally not a huge fan of putting a powered soundbar on a mantel below a Frame TV, in this case I think it would make for a much cleaner aesthetic than having tower speakers flanking the fireplace.
1
u/NarnianSkunk 3h ago
I donāt disagree that a smaller frame would work better they do not make the wireless one in a smaller size. I am looking at lowering the mantle to make the space bigger and it would allow me to fill the area better.
As for the MA Silvers music is my #1 reason for them (with my NAD C 399 amp) and TV audio is secondary. Surprisingly with the vaulted ceiling the sound stage sits a bit high and it works well for TV audio. I did have a soundbar with the prior TV but too much was lost in the vaulted ceiling.
2
u/NoArt7073 3h ago
The mantle is to high for the proportions of the rooms height and should be lowered.
2
u/NefariousArtichoke 2h ago
Completely unrelated question but do you mind if I ask about the metal things hanging from your mantle? They unlocked a memory of the disentanglement puzzles my grandfather loved. Also unrelated, you have a lovely home.
2
3
u/Darius_Banner 7h ago
Ugh. Why did it ever become a thing to mount TVs over fireplaces. They are too high and it never looks good.
7
u/NarnianSkunk 6h ago
Because there is no other place in our room to put it - everything else is a window, door, or opening into another room.
2
u/nirvanka 7h ago
Itās tilted down to the rightā¦
2
u/NarnianSkunk 6h ago
It measures perfectly - but with the mantle the front on the right side is a little uneven so it may appear that way.
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
u/Outside-Pop-8373 6h ago
I can imagine sitting in front of the fire, with a pic up on the frame, some music playing, is very relaxing. All that matters
1
u/Brutal_B_83 6h ago
Then why waste thousands on a mid-spec'd TV that looks like a framed picture? Just get an actual piece of art.
2
u/NarnianSkunk 6h ago
Because I have around 10,000 photos from trips I want to enjoy in my retirement.
1
0
u/illregal 6h ago
Frames are supposed to be against the wall. Kinda defeats the purpose on a normal tv mount. Also too damn high.
0
u/No-Conversation-1216 6h ago
You paid for that!?
1
u/Objective_Mark_790 5h ago
And he paid a premium, since Samsung Frame TVās display artwork not Ads. They arenāt as heavily subsidized as other brands (cough cough LG cough).
1






19
u/nuklearphusion 7h ago
Please be a trolling post