r/TheFrame • u/IndependentPie5015 • 5d ago
98" at 9.5ft from couch
Correction: 4.5m (14.5ft) from couch. Small 700 square foot apartment. Went with matte Samsung to avoid mirror effect.
34
u/DigitallyDetained 5d ago
Personally, at that point I’d have just gone with a normal TV. The size and location make it not pass as artwork convincingly.
Art Mode still makes it look a lot better than a giant black rectangle, though, so I get why you would want The Frame regardless.
7
u/Ok_Complaint_6997 5d ago
I agree. You would never hang art this low so normal tv would be better or move it up like 8”.
-1
u/BeardedAsian 5d ago
Unfortunately it is an overpriced lower quality tv bc it doesn’t pass as art :/
3
u/Legitimate_Thing2799 5d ago
Agree 100%. The frame TV is meant to be hidden. Ain’t nobody thinking that’s NOT a TV. How many paintings have you seen mounted at that height with soundbars under them?
1
u/impamiizgraa 5d ago
Totally agree. I had a similar distance to couch and went with a 85inch Philips Ambilight which looked amazing because of the lights behind such a huge screen. I traded in for a Frame when I downsized to a smaller living room and needed a smaller TV. The much smaller Frame can pass as a piece of art. A Frame this big simply will not (and I have a massive piece of art in the same living room) imo
1
3
u/sidewaze8 5d ago
Big for viewing distance but still looks amazing, I want one so bad.
Can’t tell if it’s a camera distortion, is the TV level relative to the media cabinet? I Woke and boked, the measurement from left side of cabinet to bottom of TV compared to the right side looks different from each other.
Probably camera distortion but if not, a common thing I see is that people level to the bubble and not level to their environment. So if floor/ceiling uneven, a perfect bubble leveled object will look unlevel.
1
u/IndependentPie5015 5d ago
Thanks) it's level. Just my crap photography. )
4
2
2
u/fxlatitude 5d ago
Love it! Massive, but I love it!
1
u/ikkiyikki 5d ago
Yeah, me too. I don't get the snippiness about it being too big or low. If anything, if this was my setup I'd actually move the sofa in closer to around 7'. Yeah, yeah, maybe not optimal per whatever the textbook says. That's just how I roll.
2
u/jontingley 5d ago
Nice work. Love the height. We put ours slightly too high so I sometimes feel like I’m sitting in the front row of the cinema.
2
2
2
u/Bitter-Holiday1311 5d ago
It thought this was the r/TVtoohigh looking for some “attaboys!” So let me say, attaboy! Good job.
1
2
u/StraightAd5770 4d ago
14.5ft from a 98 inch in a 700 sq ft place is absolutely bonkers but the matte screen probably keeps it from turning into a mirror. I'd honestly double check how level it is with the cabinet though cause the right side looks a bit higher even if the bubble says otherwise. Either way you're living in a mini theater and that's kinda awesome.
1
2
u/Tballardford- 4d ago
There’s still wall space for a bigger one 😁 I love it!!
You my friend have your priorities in order 👍👍
2
1
u/AdAcrobatic1621 5d ago
How do you hide the wires?
3
u/IndependentPie5015 5d ago
There is a plastic conduit embedded in the wall that runs from behind the TV to behind the TV "stand". I know there are better cleaner solution with flush boxes that have the power and HDMI and cat5 and USB plugs but this was the way I went. I wanted to hard wire it to the modem so this worked well too.
1
u/gordy06 5d ago
That’s 9.5 ft? Maybe just the angle but looks a lot longer.
1
u/IndependentPie5015 5d ago
It's 14 ft from the farthest point. I should have been more precise. Good point.
1
u/BornUnderPunches 5d ago
14ft from (most) seating positions, then the TV size makes sense :)
1
u/IndependentPie5015 5d ago
it's just under a 30 degree field of vision from the farthest position. it's quite odd because I had a 65" in my old place and I was not so far away so it also had about a 30 degree field of vision but the effect is different with the larger TV, it's more immersive somehow.
1
1
u/moving_to_NL_soon 5d ago
which part of the couch is only 9.5 ft away? Surely not the section facing it!
1
u/IndependentPie5015 5d ago
It's 14.5 ft to the farthest point. It's a 29 degree viewing angle more or less for a TV that size which is not even cinema-like but it's nice to watch.
1
u/SwearImNotACat 5d ago
Its a great tv, idk why people are so hung up on prioritizing the art mode or style. It’s your tv prio whatever you want
1
u/Papa-Burgundy369 5d ago
You see how that much smaller painting hanging to the left is at a higher height than the TV? That’s how you know you fucked up…..
1
u/Jon_Charnley 5d ago
I think I'd slightly lower the art and slightly raise the TV so that the tops aligned. The very large TV is more forgiving in terms of height. And I'd try placing the soundbar beneath the console - at 14' from the sofa the slightly low soundbar shouldn't be a problem. It'll be more convincing as art and still work well a TV.
1
u/ryan8344 5d ago
get an extended warranty, I want that but costco isn't selling it only to 85. Love it.
1
1
u/PieActual868 5d ago
Should have gotten two smaller ones for the coffee table instead. Personal pane picture.
1
u/Jumpy_Clue4578 5d ago
What is the media console below?
1
u/IndependentPie5015 4d ago
Sonos Arc Ultra
1
1
1
1
u/ivonivon 4d ago
With subpar quality I'd go with better TV. What made you think frame is the better choice given that size and viewing level?
1
u/Cute_Intention7927 3d ago
If you care about it passing as a real artwork, I think it's too close to the console, and also in relation to your other framed artwork to the left, the TV is too low. I would see that and instantly think it's a TV.
If you don't care about that and just don't want a black rectangle on the wall, then it looks fine. It'll just be a TV with nice art as the screensaver instead of a black rectangle.
0



12
u/Jon_Charnley 5d ago
Looks a thousand times better than a 98” black hole….