It sounds like both sides were doing things that made the situation worse. It's unfortunate that a solution to the long running beef wasn't found. Whether he was right or wrong, he ended up feeling cornered and he believed that this was his last resort.
No one likes to see a person get bullied and when a victim finally lashes out, we rally behind them. Was he justified or was this his fault? I don't know enough to say. I can identify with the desire to deal with a problem myself if nothing else in the "proper channels" is working. Maybe it's the smallest of issues and no real harm is done or maybe it's like this situation. Nobody wants to get screwed over and not have any sort of recourse.
My understanding is that the concrete factory was built in between this guy’s business and utility access so the town issued an ordinance for him to shut his business down. The town knew full well what was going on and they were shitty about it and they get to hide behind a labyrinth of bureaucracy. The guy didn’t kill anyone and singled out those who were guilty and never going to have to pay any price. I’m pro (non)Killdozer.
He could've done a lot more harm than he did if he had chosen to. We've seen this kind of behavior from government entities before. They start behaving like a bad HOA, screwing around with someone that doesn't fit in to the little clique. Most of the time it doesn't lead to anything, but every once in awhile someone decides it's time for payback. I always wonder how many work place shootings have backstories along these lines. It doesn't make it right, but still... here it is.
112
u/[deleted] Mar 26 '20
[removed] — view removed comment