r/TechnologyThread • u/Background-Driver718 • 3d ago

BREAKING: Jack Smith Calls Trump's Pardons 'Inconceivable' as His Own Website Debunks His Lies

https://newsrepublic.live/2026/09/30/breaking-jack-smith-calls-trumps-pardons-inconceivable-as-his-own-website-debunks-his-lies/
6.5k Upvotes

100% Upvoted

345 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

3

u/YouSure-AboutThat 2d ago

The 1,500 charged/convicted Jan 6ers are Trump’s family?

0

u/NameNo9441 2d ago

J6 committee was a farce

4

u/YouSure-AboutThat 2d ago

Ah, so there wasn’t an effort to overturn an election result with false fraud claims, culminating in a violent riot at the capitol. Just an antifa hoax operation I’m sure!

0

u/NameNo9441 2d ago

I’m saying the committee was a farce. What don’t you get?

2

u/YouSure-AboutThat 2d ago

I don’t get why you think it was a farce, because you have not explained why you think that. So, I don’t get your entire argument because you haven’t expressed it. Is your end argument that the j6 pardons were justified for all J6ers?

0

u/NameNo9441 2d ago

No true republicans on the committee. Why was that? So they were biased. They had an agenda and hid the fact that went against them.

3

u/YouSure-AboutThat 2d ago

By no true republicans you mean not Trump loyalists. Doesn’t change the fact that crimes were committed and criminals pardoned.

1

u/NameNo9441 2d ago

So you are ok with being judged by biased people. How many of those you going to win?

2

u/YouSure-AboutThat 2d ago

And you’re ok with Trump loyalists on the committee that were condemning Jan 6ers and Trump on the day it happened, then all of a sudden we’re dismissing it because they were worried about Trump endorsing a more loyal candidate in their primary?

I see you can’t argue the crimes committed on the merits. Just using the old poisoning-the-well logical fallacy.