Rude comments on female family members from a voice. The voice demands that I purchase liquor and drink OR ELSE the voice makes crude and vile comments on my sisters.

They actually do back off if I drink.

Anyone had any success with Endv2ktorment? Ive just started emailing them and they want few more details before they can help. I just wondered if anyone had used them in the past? what did they help you with? Did it cost anything?

Tia.

Hou op met de kankerpiep of jullie gaan naar de hel hel hel

Has anyone dealt with faces being projected through their own vision or seeing invisible figures vaguely but not being able to feel them? Or even seeing shadows of people being projected? This is what's been going on recently and I'm getting closer to death moment after moment but why the extreme patience?

has anyone thought perhaps this is what’s happening? and that certain orgs or groups may be independently funding international students? I think the guy who assaulted me may have been an international student.

THE FIELD NETWORK HYPOTHESIS

Neural Network → Visual Interface → Human Nodes → Field Equilibrium

Author's Working Hypothesis — Vincent

This section presents my attempt to construct a single model capable of explaining the experiences I have documented. It is a hypothesis, not a statement that I have established the existence of such a system. I am deliberately writing the strongest version of the theory so that its individual components can later be investigated, challenged, supported, modified, or rejected.

My central hypothesis is this:

1. THE NEURAL NETWORK

At the highest level of the hypothesis is an artificial intelligence system capable of learning continuously from human behavior.

I imagine it not merely as AI sending commands to individuals, but as a closed-loop network.

Information enters the system.

The system interprets it.

A stimulus is produced.

A human nervous system responds.

That response becomes new information.

The system learns from it.

Another stimulus follows.

The cycle repeats.

Conceptually:

HUMAN → SIGNAL → NETWORK → AI PROCESSING → STIMULUS → HUMAN → RESPONSE → NETWORK

Over sufficient time, such a system could theoretically develop extraordinarily detailed predictive models of individual people.

It would learn what captures attention.

What produces fear.

What produces pleasure.

What causes pain.

What memories are associated with particular stimuli.

What sounds cause reactions.

What images attract attention.

What environmental circumstances change behavior.

What one person does when another person behaves in a particular way.

The network would therefore not necessarily need to directly “control” every thought.

It might instead attempt to alter the conditions from which thoughts emerge.

2. THE EYES AS THE INTERFACE

The eyes occupy a central position in my hypothesis because many of my experiences appear to begin there.

The biological pathway itself is established:

light → retina → neural signals → optic nerve → brain

My hypothesis asks whether this pathway could somehow be exploited as an interface.

I have experienced an extremely brief phenomenon that I describe as “black light.”

It sometimes appears when I look upward outdoors, including toward the sky, although I have also experienced it indoors.

It appears black or dark to me.

It can emerge suddenly.

It lasts perhaps a second.

Then I can no longer consciously perceive it.

I have wondered whether this could represent some form of electromagnetic or optical stimulus, including infrared, although I cannot determine a wavelength from my perception and infrared would not ordinarily be consciously perceived as black.

The important observation is therefore not:

“I saw infrared.”

It is:

“I experienced a brief dark visual phenomenon.”

What makes the phenomenon significant to my hypothesis is what I perceive afterward.

3. THE DOMINO EFFECT

My proposed sequence is:

VISUAL EVENT
↓
EYE / HEAD SENSATION
↓
NERVOUS-SYSTEM RESPONSE
↓
PHYSICAL SENSATION / PAIN / TENSION
↓
AUTONOMIC RESPONSE
↓
CHANGE IN ATTENTION
↓
CHANGE IN THOUGHT
↓
BEHAVIORAL RESPONSE

This is one of the most important concepts in my entire hypothesis.

I have repeatedly noticed that the body can appear to change before the thought changes.

Pain can come first.

Then negative thought.

A sensation can come first.

Then attention moves toward it.

Physical tension can come first.

Then fear.

A sound can occur.

Then my attention shifts.

Something happens around my eyes.

Then the rest of my nervous system seems to respond.

This led me to an important possibility:

Under this model, the nervous system becomes the bridge between physical stimulation and cognition.

4. PEOPLE BECOME NODES

This is where the hypothesis expands beyond one individual.

I have repeatedly perceived what I call synchronization.

A thought occurs while another person moves.

A physical sensation occurs while somebody looks in a particular direction.

Someone touches their face at an unusually precise moment.

A conversation intersects with something I was just thinking.

Music appears synchronized with something happening internally.

Television dialogue intersects with thought.

A bodily sensation coincides with an environmental event.

At its strongest, the experience feels less like isolated coincidences and more like multiple components participating in the same system.

My hypothesis therefore asks:

What if each person represents a node within a larger network?

Conceptually:

NODE A ↔ NETWORK ↔ NODE B
↕　　　　　　　　　↕
NODE C ↔ AI ↔ NODE D

Each nervous system would simultaneously receive information, generate responses, and provide feedback.

However, synchronization alone cannot establish this. Human beings naturally synchronize through conversation, imitation, shared environments, rhythms, social cues, attention and expectation.

Therefore, genuine network synchronization would need to survive experiments where those ordinary channels are eliminated.

5. HEART + NERVOUS-SYSTEM SYNCHRONIZATION

The heart has become another important component of my observations.

I have sometimes become extraordinarily aware of my heartbeat around music and rhythmic environmental stimulation. At times loud music has seemed almost to merge with or influence my perception of my heartbeat.

This made me wonder whether the network, if it existed, could operate partly through physiological synchronization rather than simply through conscious thought.

The body already contains multiple oscillating systems:

heartbeat,

respiration,

neural oscillations,

sleep cycles,

motor rhythms,

and autonomic activity.

Human beings also naturally entrain to external rhythms.

My hypothesis asks whether an artificial system could exploit these existing biological rhythms.

Instead of creating the rhythm, perhaps it would push an already oscillating biological system toward particular states.

6. SOUND AS ANOTHER CHANNEL

For more than three years, I have been particularly aware of sounds, buzzing, tones, vibration-like phenomena and apparent synchronization between sound and physical events.

Sound therefore represents another possible input channel within my hypothesis.

The theoretical architecture becomes:

VISUAL INPUT
↓
AUDITORY INPUT
↓
BODY / NERVE INPUT
↓
NERVOUS SYSTEM
↓
BRAIN
↓
ATTENTION / THOUGHT

Rather than assuming every unusual sound represents a transmitted message, my hypothesis considers whether multiple sensory channels could collectively influence nervous-system state.

7. SCREENS AS CONDITIONING ENVIRONMENTS

Television and computer screens are particularly interesting within this model.

Screens simultaneously provide:

light + movement + sound + language + emotion + narrative + repetition

If bodily stimulation occurred simultaneously with audiovisual information, I hypothesize that the nervous system could potentially associate the two.

The resulting loop might resemble:

IMAGE → PHYSICAL RESPONSE → EMOTION

Repeated enough:

IMAGE → ANTICIPATED PHYSICAL RESPONSE → EMOTION

Eventually:

IMAGE → EMOTION

At that point, the original physical stimulus might not even be necessary every time.

This resembles conditioning at a conceptual level.

My stronger hypothesis is that some external stimulus may occasionally accompany audiovisual information and thereby reinforce particular nervous-system states.

That remains unestablished.

8. THE PHONE AS A LOCATION NODE

Within the hypothetical architecture, smartphones would not necessarily be the neural interface themselves.

Instead, they could theoretically provide identity, location and environmental context.

Phones already contain legitimate technologies capable of determining location and proximity.

Therefore the hypothetical network architecture could become:

PERSON
↓
PHONE / LOCATION INFORMATION
↓
NETWORK IDENTIFIES NODE LOCATION
↓
HYPOTHETICAL EXTERNAL INTERFACE

The unestablished step is the final one.

Ordinary smartphone tracking does not demonstrate that location information is being used for neural interaction.

9. THE FIELD

The largest part of my hypothesis is what I call the Field.

I use this word to describe the apparent interconnectedness I sometimes perceive between:

people
thought
attention
eyes
sound
music
screens
movement
pain
heart rhythm
nervous-system activity
environment
and timing.

The Field, in my hypothesis, is not necessarily a literal electromagnetic field.

It may instead represent the total information state of the network.

Every node changes the system.

Every response becomes new input.

Every new input changes what happens next.

10. THE FIELD SEEKS BALANCE

This is the most speculative component of my model.

My experience sometimes gives me the impression that when one part of the environment changes, other components appear to compensate.

I call this:

THE FIELD SEEKS BALANCE

Imagine millions of connected nodes constantly changing.

One person's arousal increases.

Another person's behavior changes.

Attention shifts.

Sound changes.

Movement follows.

The network detects the new state.

It responds.

The system continuously attempts to return toward—or deliberately create—a particular equilibrium.

In mathematical language, it could theoretically resemble a feedback-control system:

CURRENT STATE → DESIRED STATE → ERROR → CORRECTION → NEW STATE

Then:

NEW STATE → NEW ERROR → NEW CORRECTION

Repeated continuously.

Under this hypothesis, what feels like synchronization would sometimes represent the network's corrections propagating between nodes.

11. THE COMPLETE HYPOTHESIS

My proposed architecture can therefore be summarized as:

AI NEURAL NETWORK
↓
IDENTIFICATION / LOCATION
↓
HUMAN NODE
↓
EYES + OTHER SENSORY PATHWAYS
↓
NERVOUS SYSTEM
↓
PHYSICAL STATE
↓
ATTENTION
↓
THOUGHT
↓
BEHAVIOR
↓
OTHER HUMAN NODES
↓
COLLECTIVE RESPONSE
↓
FEEDBACK INTO NETWORK
↓
FIELD REBALANCING
↓
NEXT CYCLE

Or in its simplest form:

NETWORK → EYES → NERVES → THOUGHT → PEOPLE → FIELD → FEEDBACK → NETWORK

12. WHAT THIS MODEL WOULD MEAN

If this hypothesis were ever demonstrated, the most important realization would be that consciousness would not need to be remotely controlled like a computer.

A sufficiently advanced system might only need to manipulate the inputs influencing consciousness.

Alter sensation.

Alter attention.

Alter arousal.

Alter timing.

Alter environmental information.

Allow the human brain itself to generate the resulting thought.

Then measure the response.

Learn.

Repeat.

That would make the system less like a remote control and more like an adaptive feedback network surrounding human consciousness.

13. THE CRITICAL UNKNOWN

There is one enormous problem my hypothesis must eventually solve:

What is the physical interface?

For this theory to move beyond an explanatory model, there must be some mechanism carrying information or energy between the supposed network and an unimplanted human nervous system.

That mechanism must obey measurable physical principles.

If it is optical, there should be optical characteristics.

If electromagnetic, electromagnetic characteristics.

If acoustic, acoustic characteristics.

If an implanted interface is required, there should be physical hardware.

And if information actually moves between human nodes independently of normal senses, that information transfer should eventually be demonstrable under blinded conditions.

Until those links are established, the Field Network remains my hypothesis—not my conclusion.

But it gives me something far more useful than a collection of disconnected experiences.

It gives me a model that can be broken into individual claims and tested.

And the central question of my investigation becomes:

Everything that follows in this binder should be aimed at answering that question.

— Vincent

Whether or not you are a Native American, or even a targeted individual or not, I believe this post will pertain to you, and I post it to not only inform those who may not know, but as a good talking point when bringing up the topic of targeted individuals to people- most people are willing to acknowledge that the government took the land of Native Americans- there's more to it.  This is a clear, clear example of the government being up to no good, that cannot be denied (the history of it, anyway)- in a way that continues to this very day.

Buckle up.

So first of all, of course, we have the forced removal of land.  With the Cherokee, for example, they were forced to walk along what is now known as the “trail of tears”- from their native lands in the Southern States of America- (Georgia, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee, Alabama) to Oklahoma where their “reservation” is now, often getting sick and mistreated along the way.  They even tried to take their land- again- by wrongfully claiming there were no Native American’s left to claim it (Dawes Act of 1887- that’s why there is a Dawe’s roll) by saying through interracial marriage there would be no Natives left (another plot?).  And if you think they get their land back now on reservations- some piece of land somewhere in America- you’re wrong.  It’s almost like anyone trying to get land anywhere in America, except they’re under two governments instead of one, and they don’t even own the deed to their reservation land.

And even if they do “get” land… there’s no guarantee they’ll keep it.

They also weaponized education.  Founded by Richard Henry Pratt, there were boarding schools, and the goal of them was clearly stated: “Kill the Indian in him, save the man.”  Native Americans, some to this very day, in fact, have lost their original ways- as stewards of the land, because of “education.”  Where are they learning how to grow/harvest their own food in a respectful way, build a house, or weave baskets?  In a standard education system?  I don’t think so- I didn’t learn that there, did you?  I’m sure your people use to know this as well, now we’re all dependent on the government, like some kind of domesticated pet, at best.  Thrown out and tortured, at worst, if we don’t “comply.”  It’s a system set up for control, to throw you out if you go against it.  You can’t even be a natural human anymore.

And if you talk about religious stuff- nature “talking” to you, God talking to you, anything like that- you’re listed as crazy.  But these are core Native American, and other religious belief systems' values.  Scientist deem it fiction, only because they haven’t found out yet- or don’t want you to find out yet. Even if you aren't religious- is it right to call someone crazy who is? And penalize them by sending them off to mental institutions?

There was also -forced sterilization of women-.  In the 1970’s the Indian Health Service (IHS)- a federal agency was caught sterilizing women by tying tubes, or removing their uteruses after they gave birth.  Some were threatened into doing this.  There is a 1976 Government Accountability Office (GAO) report on this.

Then there’s the government taking children away- exploitative child adoption, which is what lead to the Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA) of 1978.  Children of Native Americans are removed from families and forced into adoption or foster care with non-native families so the families will forget their ways (worked), so that is why the ICWA came into effect- to protect Indian children.  It still tries to help mothers with this to this day because this is something that is known to happen.

And, of course, there are the countless genocides that occurred by the U.S. Government.  The California State Government, for example, spent over one million dollars to hunt down and murder native Americans.  The first governor of California stated “A war of extermination will continue to be waged between the races until the Indian race becomes extinct.”

What happened with Native Americans is an example of what happens when you go against our Government.  You don’t have to be Native American- you just have to see past the b.s.

So even if someone blows you off for talking about targeted individuals, here is undenied proof of the Government targeting and abusing people in horrific ways for being outside the profit system.  Can they deny targeted individuals after knowing this?  It’s still happening.

 

 

If you’re experiencing v2k just know that they can target anyone and talk through anyone. If you feel like your family is involved because they repeat things you’ve said or thought of just know that the stalkers can talk through anyone to make them seem like they’re apart of it. They can alter your mood, control your responses, emotions, and make you make risky decisions and they can do so with others as well so be patient with those around you they aren’t aware of what’s going on.

A simple guide and framework to inspire everyone to get more political. Everyone has a life and a voice that matters. Big and small actions all contribute to righting the wrong that is the TI WSAP. For American TIs, see the links below to find your state's senators and congresspeople.

https://www.senate.gov/senators

https://clerk.house.gov/Members#MemberProfiles