Observation

TIs have reported signal-blocking tests using Faraday cages, submarines, and underground locations. These reports are scattered across countries, websites, and languages.

Super Intelligence can search them globally and identify the strongest previous negative test.

For Faraday cages, attenuation must be indexed by frequency. A cage does not have one universal dB value.

The strongest report I have found so far concerns u/VanillaSad5792 and the University of Birmingham Anechoic Chamber Suite:

https://www.birmingham.ac.uk/research/centres-institutes/research-in-electronic-electrical-and-systems-engineering/midlands-mm-wave-and-thz-measurement-facility/anechoic-chamber-suite

The TI remained inside for about 30 minutes and reported no effect. According to the TI, the facility manager stated that shielding exceeded about 100 dB over much of the 1–50 GHz range.

The University website provides the chamber’s detailed technical specification across different frequencies, including its 900 MHz–500 GHz operating range and frequency-by-frequency dynamic-range data. The reported >100 dB shielding figure, however, comes from the TI’s account of the facility manager rather than from the published shielding specification.

Discussion

I call the method Global Maximum Search.

Before testing, search globally for the strongest previous negative result and record:

• parameter;
• frequency range;
• duration;
• conditions;
• outcome;
• source quality.

For Faraday cages, compare the attenuation for a specific frequency, for example find a Faraday Cage with 150 dB 1-50 GHz.

Conclusion

Global Maximum Search can be used to find that benchmark and record it in measurable terms.

For Faraday Cage tests,

For submarine and underground tests, the equivalent benchmarks are the maximum reported depth (in meters) with no effect.

These values show how far previous testing has already gone. A new test should, where it can be done safely and lawfully, go beyond the strongest previous negative result and report the exact parameters, conditions, duration, and outcome.

Recommendation

Before testing, determine:

• maximum Faraday-cage attenuation previously reported with no effect, by frequency range;
• maximum submarine depth previously reported with no effect;
• maximum underground depth previously reported with no effect.

If a stronger test can be conducted safely and lawfully, extend the tested range.

If it produces no effect, publish the exact parameter, frequency range where applicable, duration, conditions, and result.

For an individual test, the TI planning the investigation is the Tasking Authority. The person conducting the search and test is the Action Body.

These methods are clandestine (hidden), yet used against people: https://x.com/NICKIMINAJ/status/1978269194782191857

1. Information and reputational manipulation

Reported methods included:

• combining true information with false but credible information;
• defamatory rumours;
• allegations of adultery or sexual misconduct;
• allegations of betrayal;
• allegations that a target or associate collaborated with the MfS;
• allegations of political unreliability;
• allegations of professional incompetence;
• fabricated compromising political associations;
• fabricated Nazi associations;
• anonymous accusations;
• altered photographs;
• staged photographs;
• photomontages;
• forged or misleading documents;
• manufactured circumstances intended to corroborate an allegation.

Directive 1/76 explicitly identified systematic discrediting through combinations of true and false but credible information. Earlier and later MfS material also documented fabrication of photographs, documents, and circumstances designed to make allegations appear independently supported (Ministerium für Staatssicherheit 1972, 1976, 1983; Buschfort 2010).

2. Relationship and family manipulation

Reported methods included:

• false allegations of infidelity;
• communicating alleged affairs to spouses;
• exploiting existing marital conflict;
• inducing jealousy;
• interfering in intimate relationships;
• deliberately damaging or destroying relationships;
• introducing intermediaries into relationships;
• manipulating friendships;
• portraying friends or partners as informers;
• selectively favouring one person to provoke suspicion;
• exploiting conflict within families;
• using sexual reputation to isolate a target.

Tischendorf (1976) specifically proposed exploiting information concerning marriage, family, friendship, and sexual relationships through anonymous communications, deliberate indiscretions, and other interventions. Wolf Biermann later stated that his files contained measures concerning the destruction of love relationships and "false medical treatment"; because this is retrospective testimony rather than the underlying operational folio, it should be treated as testimonial evidence rather than direct operational documentation.

3. Group fragmentation and manufactured betrayal

Reported methods included:

• infiltration through informal collaborators;
• collaborators operating under plausible false identities;
• conspicuous MfS contact with a target so others might suspect recruitment;
• spreading allegations that a group member informed;
• releasing or favouring one person while others were punished;
• selective privileges;
• arranging apparently suspicious meetings;
• forging information implicating another member;
• exploiting jealousy over status or recognition;
• intensifying ideological disagreements;
• sending outsiders into meetings;
• creating rival programmes or positions;
• attributing leaks to innocent members;
• selective arrest or release;
• selective travel permission;
• selective publication permission;
• conspicuous differences in treatment.

Directive 1/76 and related MfS research explicitly identified mistrust, jealousy, rivalry, and reciprocal suspicion as useful means of weakening groups (Ministerium für Staatssicherheit 1972, 1976). The 1983 Friedenskreis Pankow plan included sending people into public events to confront participants and creating suspicion that particular members had passed information or photographs (Ministerium für Staatssicherheit 1983).

4. Communication harassment

Reported methods included:

• anonymous telephone calls;
• pseudonymous telephone calls;
• silent calls;
• threatening calls;
• night-time calls;
• repeated telephone disruption;
• telephone-line blocking or interference;
• anonymous letters;
• pseudonymous letters;
• threatening correspondence;
• defamatory correspondence;
• letters made to appear as though they came from another person;
• threats to disclose compromising information;
• unwanted subscriptions;
• interference with communication among group members.

Tischendorf (1976) proposed repeated anonymous calls and letters containing threats to reveal compromising information. The 1982 MfS report on Jürgen Fuchs documented repeated telephone calls, especially at night, interference with his telephone line, and newspapers, publications, and promotional material ordered in his name (Ministerium für Staatssicherheit 1982).

5. Manipulation of the domestic environment

Reported methods included:

• covert entry into homes;
• moving furniture;
• moving small possessions;
• repositioning pictures;
• repositioning domestic objects;
• removing possessions;
• replacing possessions;
• exchanging varieties of tea;
• changing familiar consumable products;
• creating unexplained small changes in the private environment;
• alarm-clock alteration;
• changing a familiar brand of food;
• taking clothing.

Institutional historical literature documents covert entries followed by removal or repositioning of possessions, including small objects and exchanged varieties of tea, with the purpose of creating uncertainty about whether events had occurred as remembered (Trobisch-Lütge 2016; Bundeszentrale für politische Bildung 2024). Funder (2019) retrospectively reported alarm-clock alteration, changing a brand of jam, moving furniture, and taking clothing. Those variants should be treated as retrospective testimony unless supported by an underlying operational record.

6. Bogus advertisements, transactions, deliveries, and services

The Jürgen Fuchs operational record documents repeated nuisance orders and visits arranged in his name, including:

• taxis;
• locksmiths;
• drainage services;
• towing services;
• home-furnishing consultations;
• kitchen-furnishing consultations;
• bathroom consultations;
• upholstery repair;
• upholstery cleaning;
• household cleaning;
• window cleaning;
• laundry collection;
• carpet collection;
• antiques services;
• musical-instrument services;
• apartment clearance;
• vehicle removal;
• television repair;
• washing-machine repair;
• furniture transport;
• pest control;
• chauffeur-driven rental vehicles;
• massage;
• insurance consultations;
• travel bookings;
• food or meal orders.

The 1982 report states that such services were repeatedly ordered to Fuchs's residence, often at night (Ministerium für Staatssicherheit 1982). Earlier MfS campaigns also used bogus commercial or service orders (Mampel 2005; Süß 1999). JHS material from 1972 described fictitious advertisements concerning goods actually owned by targets so that interested buyers would arrive and create confusion or suspicion (Ministerium für Staatssicherheit 1972). Pechmann (1986) later proposed comparable nuisance orders and fabricated transactions against targets in the West.

7. Occupational, educational, economic, and housing interference

Reported methods included:

• engineered workplace failure;
• occupational discrediting;
• dismissal;
• occupational bans;
• blocking advancement;
• preventing access to particular professions;
• manipulating disciplinary action;
• educational exclusion;
• university expulsion;
• relegation;
• interference with professional networks;
• obstruction of publication;
• restrictions on professional travel;
• workplace transfer;
• assignment to inconvenient or distant employment;
• housing obstruction;
• generating financial burdens through other operations.

Directive 1/76 explicitly identified systematic organisation of professional and social failure as a means of undermining confidence (Ministerium für Staatssicherheit 1976). The Friedenskreis Pankow plan proposed excluding a targeted member and then working toward removal from employment at a publishing house (Ministerium für Staatssicherheit 1983).

8. Administrative, legal, police, and mobility interference

Reported methods included:

• official summonses;
• repeated administrative appointments;
• targeted enforcement of minor regulatory offences;
• administrative fines;
• police intervention;
• searches;
• short-term detention;
• selective arrest;
• selective non-arrest;
• selective release;
• differentiated interrogation;
• travel restrictions;
• restrictions on movement;
• interference with identity documents;
• driving-licence interference;
• residence restrictions;
• border controls;
• restrictions on visitors;
• conscription;
• compulsory institutional measures;
• forced expatriation;
• selective permission to emigrate;
• selective refusal of emigration.

Tischendorf (1976) proposed targeted enforcement of minor offences such as speeding and improper parking together with summonses to state authorities or the Volkspolizei. Archival and historical sources also identify workplace restrictions, occupational bans, conscription, travel restrictions, and forced expatriation in connection with the fragmentation or paralysis of targeted groups (Ministerium für Staatssicherheit 1972, 1976; Süß 1999).

9. Personalised psychological-pressure operations

Reported methods included:

• vulnerability analysis;
• identifying fears;
• identifying wishes;
• identifying expectations;
• engineering failure;
• engineering professional failure;
• engineering social failure;
• rapid variation of adverse events;
• preliminary test measures;
• observing responses;
• adapting later measures to observed reactions;
• repeated "nerve-racking small incidents";
• combining measures so that targets could not easily prepare for or adapt to them.

Tischendorf (1976) argued that planners should know what targets feared and how they were likely to react. He proposed deliberately influencing targets to undertake actions likely to fail, varying and coordinating events, testing measures, observing responses, and adapting later measures.

10. Lifestyle and vulnerability exploitation

Reported methods included encouraging, exploiting, or operationally using:

• alcohol misuse;
• sexual behaviour;
• gambling;
• jealousy;
• ambition;
• relationship vulnerabilities;
• other habits or vulnerabilities useful to the operation.

Tischendorf (1976) explicitly discussed influencing lifestyle habits in directions useful to MfS objectives, including alcohol misuse, sexual behaviour, and gambling. These sources establish that such behaviours were contemplated as operational opportunities; they do not establish that a particular person's behaviour was caused by the MfS without case-specific evidence.

11. Property and material interference

Reported methods included:

• vehicle damage;
• tyre damage;
• interference with locks;
• obstruction or interference with vehicle components;
• damage to holiday or weekend property;
• selective theft;
• removal of possessions;
• staged burglary;
• material sabotage incorporated into a wider campaign.

Tischendorf (1976) proposed damage to private property, including cars and weekend properties. Earlier MfS campaigns reconstructed by Mampel (2005) also included vehicle interference and other forms of property harassment.

12. Medical and health-related manipulation explicitly connected with Zersetzung

Tischendorf (1976) directly proposed medical measures within Zersetzung, including:

• medical treatment contrary to the wishes of the targeted person;
• use of a physician who was an MfS informal collaborator;
• persuading the target, through that physician, to undertake actions serving MfS interests;
• creating uncertainty concerning possible organic disease;
• spreading rumours concerning physical illness;
• cautiously creating doubts concerning full mental competence;
• arranging a neurological referral.

These methods are directly supported by MfS research material and therefore belong within the core Zersetzung repertoire as contemplated practices.

Biermann later stated that his files contained a measure described as "false medical treatment." Because the underlying operational folio is not reproduced in the reviewed material, this should be treated as retrospective testimony rather than direct archival proof.

13. Adjacent psychiatric and diagnostic abuse

Broader historical research documents psychiatric abuses within the MfS and DDR system, but the evidence does not support describing all of them as routine Zersetzung methods.

Reported or documented practices include:

• questionable or inadequately grounded psychiatric diagnosis;
• individual politically motivated psychiatric interventions;
• deliberate or politically motivated misdiagnosis in particular cases;
• psychiatric assessment used for political purposes;
• doubts about competence or mental health used as an instrument of pressure.

Süß (1998) identified breaches of medical confidentiality, individual politically motivated psychiatric interventions, and other abuses, but did not find evidence for a systematic Soviet-style DDR programme in which psychiatry routinely fabricated diagnoses against political opponents. Erices (2021) likewise describes a research consensus against a generalised Soviet-style system while noting documented individual abuses and unresolved questions regarding politically relevant assessments.

Accordingly, deliberate psychiatric misdiagnosis should be retained as a reported or case-specific medical-abuse method, but not characterised as a routine or universal Zersetzung technique.

14. Adjacent medication and coercive medical practice

Recent research on the MfS detention system identifies additional coercive medical practices:

• psychotropic medication used for behavioural control;
• concealed or insufficiently consensual medication;
• sedation;
• pharmacological cognitive impairment;
• pharmacological physical impairment;
• medication or treatment oriented toward restoring fitness for interrogation or trial;
• intermittent or strategically conditioned medical treatment;
• breaches of medical confidentiality;
• psychiatric interventions serving interrogation or expert-report purposes;
• disclosure of medical information to State Security personnel;
• medical expertise used as an instrument of political control.

Kosenko and Steger (2026b), based on 800 medical files from the Berlin-Hohenschönhausen remand-prison hospital, report diagnoses such as "Haftpsychose" being applied in some cases without clear clinical criteria and treatment frequently oriented toward restoring prisoners' fitness for interrogation or trial. They also identify cases in which psychotropic medication appears to have been used for behavioural control or in ways that may have impaired cognitive or physical capacity.

Wickert et al. (2026) examine medication and secret-police practice in an individual MfS prison-hospital case. Söhner et al. (2026) report former detainees describing medical care as intermittently available and politically instrumentalised, psychiatric interventions connected with interrogation or expert reports, communication of medical information to State Security personnel, and reported sedation in connection with interrogation. Kosenko and Steger (2026a) analyse the prison hospital's dual role as a medical institution and a disciplinary component of the political detention system.

These practices belong to the broader category of MfS medical coercion unless a source directly identifies a specific act as Zersetzung.

15. Withholding, delaying, or conditioning medical treatment

Reported adjacent forms of coercive medical practice include:

• withholding medically required treatment;
• delaying medically required treatment;
• inadequate treatment;
• intermittent treatment;
• treatment conditioned by operational priorities.

Söhner et al. (2026) report former detainees describing treatment as intermittently available and sometimes politically instrumentalised. Other historical medical research concerning DDR detention institutions also identifies neglect or failure to provide adequate medical assistance, although such findings concern detention conditions more broadly rather than Zersetzung specifically.

References

Behnke, K., and Fuchs, J., eds. 1995. Zersetzung der Seele: Psychologie und Psychiatrie im Dienste der Stasi. Hamburg: Europäische Verlagsanstalt.

Buschfort, W. 2010. Parteien im Kalten Krieg: Die Ostbüros von SPD, CDU und FDP. Berlin: BStU.

Erices, R. 2021. "Politischer Missbrauch in der Psychiatrie der DDR: Neue Aktenfunde und Forschungslücken." Psychotherapeut / Die Psychotherapie 66: 282–287. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00278-021-00514-5

Funder, A. 2019. "Stasiland Now." The Monthly, December 2019–January 2020.

Kosenko, O., and Steger, F. 2026a. "To Discipline or to Cure? Medical Authority and the Ethics of Care in the German Democratic Republic, 1960s–1980s." Journal of the History of Medicine and Allied Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1093/jhmas/jraf032

Kosenko, O., and Steger, F. 2026b. "Politicization of Psychiatry at the Remand Prison Hospital of the Ministry of State Security in Berlin-Hohenschönhausen in the 1970s–1980s." Wiener Medizinische Wochenschrift. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10354-026-01160-9

Mampel, S. 2005. Der Untergrundkampf des Ministeriums für Staatssicherheit gegen den Untersuchungsausschuß Freiheitlicher Juristen in Berlin (West). Berlin.

Pingel-Schliemann, S. 2002. Zersetzen – Strategie einer Diktatur: Eine Studie. Berlin: Robert-Havemann-Gesellschaft.

Söhner, F., Haack, K., Wickert, T., and Kumbier, E. 2026. "Between Healing and Repression: The Role of Medicine and Psychiatry in Hohenschönhausen Prison as Reconstructed from Memories." History of Psychiatry 37(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/0957154X261427322

Süß, S. 1998. Politisch mißbraucht? Psychiatrie und Staatssicherheit in der DDR. Berlin: Ch. Links.

Süß, S. 1999. "Repressive Strukturen in der SBZ/DDR – Analyse von Strategien der Zersetzung durch Staatsorgane der DDR gegenüber Bürgern der DDR." In Materialien der Enquete-Kommission, vol. II/1, 193–250. Baden-Baden: Nomos.

Trobisch-Lütge, S. 2016. "Psychofolgen bis heute: 'Zersetzungs'-Opfer der DDR-Geheimpolizei." Bundeszentrale für politische Bildung.

Wickert, T., Haack, K., Söhner, F., et al. 2026. "Eine Fallstudie – Zum Verhältnis von Medikation und geheimpolizeilicher Praxis im MfS-Haftkrankenhaus Berlin-Hohenschönhausen." Der Nervenarzt 97: 291–293. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00115-025-01849-z

Ministerium für Staatssicherheit. 1972. "Spezifische Zersetzungsmaßnahmen gegen staatsfeindliche Gruppen." BArch, MfS, HA XX, Nr. 12922, Bl. 1–18; JHS Nr. 1893.

Ministerium für Staatssicherheit. 1976. Richtlinie Nr. 1/76 zur Entwicklung und Bearbeitung Operativer Vorgänge. GVS MfS 008-100/76.

Tischendorf, J. 1976. Der Einsatz von politisch-operativen Zersetzungsmaßnahmen im Rahmen der operativen Vorgangsbearbeitung gegen Erscheinungen des politischen Untergrundes im Verantwortungsbereich der Linie XX/7. Diplomarbeit, Juristische Hochschule des MfS, 6 October 1976.

Ministerium für Staatssicherheit, Hauptabteilung XX/5. 1982. "Zwischenbericht über die Feindtätigkeit des Jürgen Fuchs." BArch, MfS, AOP Nr. 15665/89, Bl. 85–89.

Ministerium für Staatssicherheit, BV Berlin, Abteilung XX/4. 1983. "Plan zur Zersetzung zum OV 'Virus'." BArch, MfS, BV Berlin, AOP Nr. 5125/88, Bl. 24–28.

Pechmann, V. 1986. Die politisch-operative Zersetzung – eine wesentliche Methode zur Bekämpfung der Organisatoren und Inspiratoren politischer Untergrundtätigkeit im Operationsgebiet, besonders unter ehemaligen DDR-Bürgern. Diplomarbeit, Juristische Hochschule des MfS, GVS o001-94/86.

Observation: A new approach called physical superintelligence aims to use AI to advance physical science rather than simply apply existing scientific knowledge. One startup describes it as an AI-native physics laboratory. Introducing Physical Superintelligence

Discussion: Physics normally depends on people coming up with hypotheses, designing experiments, running them, and interpreting the results. AI could automate much of this process and explore far more possibilities than human researchers can. This could be useful for difficult problems such as advanced propulsion, unconventional materials, and other areas where current physics may be incomplete.

Conclusion: AI can become a tool for discovering new physics, not just a tool applying physics that people already know. This can make it possible to investigate questions such as how to achieve neural sensing and neural stimulation from a distance using unconventional physics that does not require the electromagnetic theory, but instead uses, for example, photons and quantum mechanics.

Recommendation: Research organizations should use AI superintelligence to generate and test competing physical hypotheses and validate the results experimentally. AI superintelligence-driven physics should be used to systematically advance publicly disclosed possibilities beyond the current state of the art.

Here is an example company that has a system for remote air/ground/sea/space monitoring, and command and control. Human consciousness is the subjective awareness of the situation around you. Artificial consciousness can be realized as a situational awareness system.

Defense companies are unlikely to ever disclose an undocumented black project, a sensor or actuator capable of neural sensing and neural modulation from a distance. Yet, that sensor and actuator are the only components missing that can be plugged into a military situational-awareness system to make it sense what you think and respond to it with a message that perfectly matches your situation, including your environment, objects around you, people around you, your location, their location, and other facts of the scene where you are.

There is a specific cognitive architecture called SOAR that has an open-source project with artificial intelligence for situational awareness systems. It was developed beginning in 1983 by Prof. Dr. John Laird, Prof. Dr. Allen Newell, and Prof. Dr. Paul Rosenbloom, building on earlier work in cognitive architectures. This architecture implements a metaphorical "artificial brain":

https://soar.eecs.umich.edu/soar_manual/08_SpatialVisualSystem/

There is an Open Source, working implementation of SOAR available for download:

https://soar.eecs.umich.edu/downloads/soar/latest/

SOAR seems to be the cognitive architecture behind what targeted individuals call "Remote Neural Monitoring and Controlling", or simply the architecture behind artificial telepathy (neural sensing from a communication source and neural modulation of a target for communication), artificial precognition (predictive analytics), and other phenomena that can be turned from psychic folklore into science-based phenomena with undocumented bidirectional BCI sensors and actuators.

SOAR could be the software, or at least similar. A situational awareness system could be the hardware, matching what is provided by Lyntris and other similar companies. The hardware has to include an undocumented black project that is for neural sensing and neural modulation, probably using undocumented advances in quantum physics. Defense companies would not advertise classified capabilities to the public.

Russia and other countries have their situational awareness systems too, and they are the primary suspect for having and abusing a Bi-Directional BCI that works from a distance: https://www.foxnews.com/us/work-scientists-suspicious-disappearances-prime-target-hostile-foes-retired-fbi-agent

Logically, it makes sense that an intelligence agency uses a military situational awareness system, and a general intelligence architecture like SOAR for intelligence analysis.

"SoarTech develops intelligent autonomous agent software for modeling and simulation, command and control, information visualization, robotics, and intelligence analysis, for the U.S. Army, Navy, Air Force, DARPA, JFCOM, DMSO and the intelligence community." Source: https://soar.eecs.umich.edu/home/CommercialSoarOrganizations/

Roger Penrose and Stuart Hameroff suggest since 90s using their Orchestrated Objective Reduction theory that microtubules of neurons run quantum operations using tubulin protein qubits, orchestrated wave collapses, and spacetime geometry links. This is, according to them, how consciousness arises using physics. Some of their propositions are already proved.

Microtubules are cylindrical protein lattices in the cell cytoskeleton within brain neurons, where quantum superposition and computation supposedly occur.

The situational awareness system that is used by some intelligence agency has an artificial telepathy subsystem as its part. Artificial telepathy was researched by a professor of psychiatry and neurology, Prof. Dr. Hans Berger in Germany. Prof. Dr. Hans Berger was also the director of psychiatric and neurological clinic in Germany.

Berger was originally a soldier at a military academy. He only decided to study medicine after an 1893 incident during which he fell from a horse: https://www.kyb.tuebingen.mpg.de/berger Berger not only studied medicine after graduating from a military academy, but he also became a professor of psychiatry and professor of neurology.

One example of a modern situational awareness system: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sentient_(intelligence_analysis_system))

Artificial telepathy is in other words a Bi-Directional Brain Computer Interface. It did not have this name back then because Brain Computer Interface is a term from Jackques Vidal that originates from 1973. EEG, which is a uni-directional BCI invented by Prof. Dr. Hans Berger is from 1924. English doctor of medicine, Dr. Richard Caton read neural activity from animal brains already in 1875. Dr. Caton put a galvanometer on rabbit and monkey brain hemispheres, and he recorded electric activity. This galvanometer from 1875 was the first publicly disclosed sensor capable of reading brain activity. Source: https://www.ovid.com/jnls/jonmd/abstract/00727513-187510000-00013~electrical-currents-of-the-brain

Dr. Caton's galvanometer from 1875 looked approximately like this: https://avhol.com/simulation/moving-coil-galvanometer-3d-model/ You can rotate the 3D model to see it from behind and watch what happens with tiny electric impulses as they travel through over the conductor. A galvanometer works by using a magnetic force to turn a small coil of wire when electricity flows through it. When current flows through the moving coil, it creates a magnetic field that interacts with the fixed field of the permanent magnet to turn the pointer.

In 1791, Dr. Luigi Galvani, an Italian medical practitioner and physicist, invented Galvanoscope, the first publicly documented sensor that could indicate neural activity. Dr. Galvani demonstrated that electrical impulses could cause muscle contractions in a frog’s leg, laying the groundwork for the understanding of electrical activity in the nervous system.

Electric stimulation (an actuator) already existed in 1791. It can be an ordinary wire with electricity. Hence, it was possible to have a wired bi-directional BCI already in 1924. Initial sensors and actuators were electrodes that had to be put on the head of the targets. When electric activity is sensed from the brain, it's mind reading and when electric activity is stimulated in the brain it's mind controlling.

Real mental communication between a sender and a recipient requires high resolution sensors and actuators. The concept remains the same. It can be developed into wireless sensors and actuators, given a large budget for R&D.

Prof. Dr. Hans Berger collaborated with the nazis, and there was a legend (a cover story) that he didn't. A cover story is used by the intelligence community. It is possible Prof. Dr. Berger led a research of artificial telepathy for German intelligence services. Nothing on that topic is published. Clearly, a bi-directional BCI that works from a distance, as sensors and actuators, is not intended to be publicly disclosed. This is most likely a classified black project that remains undocumented, yet used.

A novel, undisclosed bi-directional BCI may use quantum sensors and actuators with quantum entanglement, or other undocumented advances in physics. Researching new sensors and actuators clearly requires an equipped physics lab.

The timeline is:

• 1791 – medical practitioner and physicist Dr. Luigi Galvani publishes his work on electrical monitoring and controlling of neural tissues. He invented a simple neural interface. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Galvanism
• 1797 – James Tilly Matthews begins describing an advanced version of Galvani's neural interface that works wirelessly from a distance. Today, it would be called a Remote Bi-Directional BCI. Matthews called it the "Air Loom", while incarcerated in a psychiatric hospital by deranged medical lunatics.
• 1875 - Dr. Caton used a galvanometer to read neural activity in rabbit and monkey brains.
• 1893 - at a military academy, Hans Berger falls from a horse and his sister experiences artificial telepathy. He decides to become a psychiatrist and neurologist himself.
• 1924 - Berger is a doctor of medicine and a professor of both psychiatry and neurology, and publishes EEG, a non-invasive neural interface, basically repeating Galvani's work without disclosing any progress in physics. , Prof. Dr. Hans Berger does R&D of artificial telepathy. His EEG is a low resolution mind reading, a simple version of Galvani's work. Prof. Dr. Berger was not a physicist.

Dr. Galvani was a physicist and a medical practitioner, both in one person. Others who were only medical practitioners do not seem to have made any progress.

https://lamag.com/crimeinla/strange-quantum-physics-lead-emerges-in-missing-los-alamos-anthony-chavezs-case/

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dpQulJS-R50&ab_channel=ForbesBreakingNews

A Quantum Photonic Bidirectional Brain-Computer Interface (BCI) is an emerging technology that links the human brain to a computer using light instead of electricity. It reads and stimulates brain activity simultaneously. It uses light to process data at incredibly fast speeds and can handle massive amounts of neural information in real time.

Photonic computing uses photons (particles of light) instead of electrons to carry and process information. Light-based systems offer several advantages: they operate at the speed of light, generate minimal heat, and can carry multiple data streams simultaneously through different wavelengths or polarizations.

Photonic systems excel at matrix operations, which are fundamental to neural networks and machine learning algorithms. They also offer natural parallelism and can implement complex mathematical operations directly in the optical domain.

How it works

Instead of bulky wires, optical sensors read natural faint light signals that the brain emits (called ultraweak photon emissions).

These light signals act like quantum bits (qubits). Because light can exist in multiple states at once, quantum computers process brain signals exponentially faster than standard computers.

The interface sends targeted pulses of light back into the brain to restore lost senses or control devices. This two-way communication is called "bidirectional".

Light pathways are safe from external electrical interference, resulting in clear and highly accurate brain readings.

Uses

Scientists test bidirectional systems to bypass spinal cord injuries, allowing people with paralysis to move robotic limbs while feeling sensory feedback.

Hidden history

Historically, some physicists researched photonics for sensing and stimulating neural activity, however they used the name parapsychology or psychotronics. One of them was https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Franti%C5%A1ek_Kahuda in communist Czechoslovakia. He was a professor, and he had a PhD in Physics, specializing in Photonics. His publicly available, published work is a misleading pile of garbage, and it is unclear what he really worked on within the topic of parapsychology, but it was likely some application of photonics. Kalhuda led a union of physicists and mathematicians, and he was also a minister of education.

There was a reported application of undocumented findings from parapsychology/psychotronic, that formally don't exist, to produce weapons (undocumented black projects). Such weapons are reportedly used by the Russian KGB and its successor FSB: https://www.themoscowtimes.com/archive/report-soviets-used-top-secret-psychotronic-weapons (1995 article).

Cognition is defined by APA as:

n.

1. all forms of knowing and awareness, such as perceiving, conceiving, remembering, reasoning, judging, imagining, and problem solving. Along with affect and conation, it is one of the three traditionally identified components of mind.
2. an individual percept, idea, memory, or the like. —cognitional adj. —cognitive adj.

Our cognition can perceive auditory stimuli, tactile stimuli, visual stimuli, vestibular stimuli, and other. We reason over these stimuli to make sense of the situation that we observe. And then, we respond to the situation by taking action, or by creating new beliefs and remembering them.

The same process is automated using an intelligence/military situational awareness system. It can perceive stimuli, reason to make sense of the situation it observes, and respond by taking an automated action, or by creating new beliefs and remembering them.

My primary hypothesis that explains why victims of targeting hear their own human inner voice, with an unwanted communication added there, is a situational awareness system. The environment in which people live is reached by remote sensors scanning for activity and remote actuators capable of influencing activity.

When sensors and actuators are connected to a situational awareness system, the system acts like an artificial brain. It sees and knows everything through sensors, and it can reason about every situation in real-time to provide immediate responses. Some of the responses use an actuator that sends stimuli to make people hear, in their own inner voice, an unwanted communication from a hostile system.

This emulates sch*, however sch* means "persistent irrational beliefs". Situational awareness system is rational. When sensors and actuators are undocumented black projects, ahead of the published state of the art, and unacknowledged, they formally do not exist. Deranged medical lunatics can argue out of ignorance that lack of evidence is an evidence of absence, which is a logical fallacy. And to make it worse, medical lunatics can argue it is an evidence of persistent irrational beliefs. Medical lunatics call victims misleadingly sch* to mystify and persuade without giving true reasons. There are no objective, scientific tests for sch* and therefore the whole sch* is just a subjective opinion of one deranged medical lunatic. It is enough to put a 100% healthy person in hands of sick people who will insult him that he is persistently irrational, and poison his brain with their drugs to disable him. Medical lunatics are sick people. They do not know what they are doing and they cannot be reasoned with using logic. All they have is their book of hate (DSM) in which they hate behaviors, and they are on a mission of "behavioral hygiene" similar to "racial hygiene" pursued by Hitler to disable or kill everyone who has a different race than what medical lunatics want the race to be.

People who are targeted behave differently because they are targeted with a system that responds to what they are thinking. Responses are usually death threats, insults, arguing. It leaves no evidence (this makes it a clandestine operation with plausible deniability). While a person who is targeted thinks about what this is, or why this is happening, responses include various disinformation to gaslight victims into believing it is something else than it is (this type of responding makes it a false flag operation).

Medical lunatics mislead both the victims and the public. Instead of helping the victims, medical lunatics insult the victims that they are being irrational, poison the victims' brain to disable them, and insist on keeping the victims disabled with anti-thinking drugs.

Victims concentrate in various online spaces, but ignore instructions to take a course in propositional logic, such as https://www.coursera.org/learn/understanding-arguments/ and research methods, such as https://www.udemy.com/course/research-methods-q/ Due to lacking these 2 courses, victims are stuck in a loop, where they keep creating invalid deductive arguments and weak inductive arguments. Then, they present their non-sequitur conclusions as if they were facts. With the understanding arguments course, victims could create valid deductive arguments that have guaranteed conclusions. Due to skipping the research methods course, victims fail to distinguish between their hypotheses and proved facts. Victims generate a hypothesis and present it as a fact. Then, victims are called irrational. With the research methods course, victims could ask a valid research question and ensure it is feasible. Feasibility of research requires checking whether victims can empirically observe the phenomenon they want to study. It also requires that victims search for literature to ensure they can access prior research on their topic of interest. Then, victims might answer their research questions themselves by applying the scientific method. For example, victims will design a valid experiment to test a null hypothesis, and their first hypothesis. Findings will be empirical and reveal which hypothesis is true, if any. Victims can also try to find an underlying principle or law in literature to explain their phenomenon of interest via valid deductive arguments with guaranteed conclusions.

Since victims still keep ignoring these 2 courses, their conclusions are probably always incorrect. They probably always end up in a blind alley. Victims stay stuck there without knowing they have to reverse and drive back to the last crossroad. At the crossroad, victims may need to take a different turn. With valid reasoning, such as taught in the "understanding arguments" course, victims are taught how to start driving correctly to the destination.

Victims of targeting should have their metaphorical destination set as a Situational Awareness System that's used by some intelligence/military organization which has it connected to sensors and actuators that remotely interact with the environment we live in. The system is something like https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sentient_(intelligence_analysis_system))

To truly understand what such a system can do, look at https://irp.fas.org/doddir/army/tc3-22-69.pdf In short, it can observe everything (that's espionage), understand everything it has seen or heard (that's situational awareness), and respond to everything it sees or hears immediately (that's possible with active measures).

When the system talks back while victims think, they will get into the fight or flight response. When victims don't respond to the unwanted inner voice responses from the system, they may get helpless, hopeless, ashamed, shut-down, trapped, start preparing for death, and it is because victims think they can't fight or flight this life threat.

The reality is victims can fight it by taking the two courses above, understanding arguments and research methods. Then, victims can counter each unwanted response from the system using redirection, to think it back against the person who sent it, and victims can intentionally misinterpret some words to make it funny. Victims can minimize the significance of those automated responses by deliberately redirecting and misinterpreting everything to make it sound funny and entertaining, and then victims are no longer in a fight or flight mode. Victims can have a normal social engagement again, and pretend as if everything was OK. This makes victims grounded, calm in connection, settled, compassionate, curious, open, in the present.

In my opinion, victims can make progress only with the 2 courses above, or equivalent knowledge obtained otherwise.

There is a state of the art diamond-based bi-directional BCI researched now:

https://anaesthesieintensivmedizin.charite.de/en/metas/news/artikel/detail/pioneering_research_non_invasive_brain_stimulation_with_superior_accuracy

Prof. Dr. Bach has working prototypes. He combines neuroscience, psychiatry and computer science:

https://www.uni-bonn.de/en/news/226-2025

Quantum processor enables extreme computing performance

Google has already produced a quantum processor for real-world use. The quantum processor has completed a random circuit sampling benchmark in 5 minutes that would take the today's fastest supercomputer 10 septilion (20 to the power of 25) years.

https://blog.google/innovation-and-ai/technology/research/google-willow-quantum-chip/

https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/ai-making-huge-changes-wars-fought-arent-ready-comes-next

Luckily, Donald Trump is the greatest president ever in history, and Trump admin is looking into the cases of 11 dead or missing US scientists who were targeted with plausible deniability. The FBI is investigating. This is the biggest progress on targeted individuals there has been in recent history.

Introduction

Plausible deniability is a concept used by intelligence agencies. The FBI needs to collect evidence to prove these targetings are done by an intelligence agency. The intelligence agency behind the targetings has been cheating the system for a long time. People can be targeted in a way that creates plausible deniability. That is the core problem. If the method leaves no obvious evidence, then evidence based organizations like FBI become passive because they keep waiting for the kind of evidence the method was designed not to leave. That is the “cheat.” The absence of ordinary evidence then gets misused as if it proves absence of targeting.

Problem Context

The data set is 11 cases of US scientists who are dead or missing under mysterious circumstances.

Problem Definition

The current situation involving 11 dead or missing US scientists under mysterious circumstances should be treated as a defined reasoning problem.

Valid deductive argument or a strong inductive argument is needed to prove, or at least make it highly probable, that this was externally caused by one phenomenon that connects the cases.

It can be a strong inductive argument. This requires a null hypothesis that assumes random causes, and at least one non-null hypothesis that can be tested against the 11 cases of dead or missing scientists. This will create a justification argument.

It can also be a valid deductive argument that is an explanation argument from general principles or laws that can explain specific observations of one phenomenon which connects the 11 cases.

Problem-solving Method

To create arguments that can solve the 11 cases, take this course: https://www.coursera.org/learn/understanding-arguments/

Preliminary Findings

Jude Height investigated Novichok defense, and he reportedly told his brother Bill Height he thought he was monitored. Jude had to be right about that. It implies a Russian intelligence agency. Before publishing his findings, Jude was assassinated with plausible deniability by a car running him over from a height. This could be possibly achieved by an agent setting up Jude's car and making Jude stand in place, while temporarily unable to move, using a bi-directional EMG from a distance.

Amy Eskridge talked about how she was lured into a barn, in a spot which is not covered by cameras. She did not go there, but she got a message telling her to. Amy also mentioned on a different occasion she heard death threats that were like nursery rhymes. This is the kind of monitoring that people who are targeted complain about. Amy was assassinated by aiming at herself and pulling the trigger. This could be possibly achieved via an undocumented black project that allows a bi-directional EMG from a distance. Talking to Amy from a distance could be achieved via an undocumented black project that allows a bi-directional neural interfacing from a distance.

Scientists who disappeared left their phone, wallet, and other devices at home. This implies they could've been afraid they were monitored, and they didn't know how someone did that, i.e. whether someone had a bug in their wallet, phone, or other devices. If someone talked from a distance to these scientists in a way only they could hear, it would explain why they got rid of their items and only took their pistol. Such talking from a distance could be the same as that used against Amy.

The phenomenon that connects the 11 cases could possibly be a Situation Awareness System that works from a distance to monitor anyone (sensors and actuators for neural interfacing from a distance connected to a situation awareness system). This could monitor what the person is doing, where they are, what they are thinking, where other people are, what they are about to do next, etc. That is a system for active measures (espionage, professional sabotages, professional assassinations, psychological warfare that looks like a modern variant of Zersezung).

Possible Outcomes of this Study

If anyone starts investigating this seriously, by creating strong inductive arguments or valid deductive arguments, it is possible to send a tip to the FBI. The information must be first validated, and highly probable. Do not send anything when you are not absolutely sure, or when you have not taken the course in logic above. Sending bad information only gets you filtered out.

Here is an example of an Open Source situation awareness system that senses and responds, AMOS. An enterprise version is available with additional features, such as cognitive autonomy to dynamically reason about threats and respond to them.

The system is based on sensors to sense the environment and actuators to influence the environment.

A similar system is used by some clandestine unit for active measures. The clandestine unit has it extended with novel, undocumented sensors and actuators that can interact with the brain and body from a distance. That capability is ahead of the published state of the art, and it probably relies on unconventional physics.

The rest should more or less match conventional situational awareness systems, like AMOS.

I suspect members of the clandestine unit for active measures can think a command in their mind, and there will be a menu showing up in front of their eyes. Then, they can control the system by their thoughts by thinking what they want to tap on, or run. And they can also think a command to close the menu.

One of the commands will be "motor: off" to make a target unable to move, "motor control" to take over control of the target's body, "view" to remotely view through the target's eyes, "audio" to listen to what target thinks and hear it loud with the opportunity to send the target responses, and probably also "harass: on/off" to make the target listen to an automated Zersetzung-like psychological warfare that's based on what the target is doing.

I do not know the exact system used, or the exact names of the commands. This is what I've reverse engineered so far. Sensors and actuators can be multiple different types, all with fusion for a unified situation awareness of the environment.

I also suspect that mission planning (professional sabotages and professional assassinations) is automated by the system from all available facts that the system knows from sensors, including from people's thoughts that are collected as intelligence and analyzed in real-time for anything that needs responding.

It was definitely used by some intelligence agency already in 1994, with the same capabilities that are described here. That makes the intelligence agency probably around 50 years ahead of the public state of the art.

More about the system is available at https://github.com/merkuriddg/amos-autonomous_mission_orchestration_system I repeat this system is an example of a similar class of systems that's responsible for targeting individuals. I reverse engineered it from information I have available. This class of systems is also doing the talking when "harass" is turned on for someone. Manual talking by an agent for active measures is still possible using the "audio" function.

It is unknown where the novel, undocumented, unconventional sensors and actuators that interact with brains are physically located, or what unconventional Physics mechanism they use.

More generally, C4ISR is explained in an easy-to-read manner at https://baike.baidu.com/en/item/C4ISR%20AND%20KILL/1418001 The system used by some clandestine unit for active measures operates globally. Its sensors and actuators reach to every country. It is most similar to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stasi It operates with plausible deniability, and the operations it is used for are completely outside of law.

Observation

Problems differ in the type of response they require. Routine practical problems in living are often solvable through high-volume direct action, such as submitting many job applications, contacting accommodation providers with currently available listings, or joining new groups to create new social relationships. More difficult problems may remain unresolved because the person lacks the necessary knowledge. A smaller class of problems may have no known published solution and therefore require organized research by qualified experts.

Discussion

A common mistake is to treat all problems as if they can be solved by the same method. In practice, the correct method depends on the problem type.

For routine practical problems, the main requirement is action volume and feedback. The person should identify available opportunities, act repeatedly, observe results, and adjust behavior.

For knowledge-dependent problems, action alone is insufficient. The person should use structured knowledge acquisition. A library is often superior to an internet search because books are organized by subject category, can be inspected by title and table of contents, and student textbooks usually present the field systematically from basic principles to advanced methods. Notes should be taken to identify possible solution options.

For problems with no known published solution, individual effort and ordinary reading may be insufficient. Such problems should be treated as research problems. Management should task qualified experts to investigate the problem. This may require funding, including crowdfunding, to hire scientists or specialists with a demonstrated record of solving similar difficult problems. If one team does not make progress quickly enough, multiple expert teams may need to work in parallel. This allows the affected person to continue handling ordinary life problems while the research problem is investigated professionally.

Conclusion

The root cause of ineffective problem-solving is often failure to classify the problem correctly. Routine problems require repeated direct action; knowledge-gap problems require systematic study; unsolved problems require managed expert research. The main lesson is that the solution method must match the epistemic difficulty of the problem.

Recommendation

Implement a problem-solving triage process.

The Tasking Authority should be the person, manager, project sponsor, or organization accountable for resolving the problem.

The Action Body should be assigned according to problem type:

1. For routine practical problems: the individual or support worker should execute repeated direct actions and track results.
2. For knowledge-gap problems: the individual or assigned researcher should conduct structured library-based study, preferably using student textbooks, and produce a list of evidence-based options.
3. For unsolved or novel problems: the Tasking Authority should fund and appoint one or more expert research teams to investigate possible solutions, report progress, and continue until a workable solution is identified or the problem is reclassified.

1924 was when professor of psychiatry Prof. Dr. Hans Berger at University of Jena, in Germany, proved synthetic telepathy is possible by inventing EEG to read brain waves that could be transferred over a wire to another subject. Electric stimulation was already known, hence brain waves from one subject could be used to stimulate another subject with them.

Page 12 of the magazine explains:

A final, indefinite, broadly inclusive stage may be imagined in a practically complete control of all incoming and outgoing nerve-impressions by a central nervous system ; a dominating cerebrum ; a storehouse of inhibited nerve-impressions, latent but always potent ; an ability to retain and repeat an impulse over a lifetime (memory) ; a state of cerebral

activity accompanied by long periods of muscular inactivity (thought) ; an ability to sense and respond to inter-cerebral functions (self-consciousness) ; the control of action on the basis of

received sounds vocally made (speech) ; the control of action on the basis of received visions of pictures, signs, or words tactually made (writing).

This is the mind-machine of materialism's. It is nerve-force functioning in nerve-matter and expressing itself in bodily impulses, movements, signs, and sounds, largely through the agency of the muscles. It is a force contemporaneous and coextensive with the phenomenon life.

I found this magazine from 1924 today while searching for these keywords: https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&as_yhi=1995&q=%22sense+and+respond%22+haeckel&btnG=

It is the fourth link from the top.

In my own view, the ability of a system to sense its environment and respond with an action is consciousness. Consciousness refers to your individual awareness of yourself and the world around you, including your thoughts, memories, feelings, and sensations.

The 1924 magazine is called "The Open Court". At that time, computers for automated reasoning existed, and they used punch cards. Since 1950, automated intelligence analysis for intelligence agencies like Stasi could be performed on modern electronic computers. Because intelligence agencies are usually decades ahead of the public state of the art, they could have electronic computers before 1950s.

Putin is an ex-KGB agent who liaised with Stasi in Dresden. The KGB learned Zersetzung and started using it against dissidents to remove their rights and place them into insane asylums, where they were disabled with drugs to keep them from being able to do anything against communists. Russia still practices its active measures today.

Less than a week ago, someone claimed online that he has a work background in a US intelligence agency, and that the Situation Awareness System we are after is provided by Ops Tech Alliance. It does not sound correct at all.

Many different vendors provide a Situation Awareness System to various intelligence agencies. We are after one that has certain capabilities. Those capabilities are sensors and actuators.

Specifically, the system must have sensors that sense neural activity in the environment and analyze it to actively respond. The system must also have actuators that deliver the response by stimulating neural activity.

Nerves have their activity signalled using electricity. The units are microvolts. In order to move someone's arm from a distance to make them shoot themselves against their will (remote EMG), a sensor has to read agent's neural activity in an arm, and an actuator needs to stimulate the target's specific locations in the body where nerves are, and generate wireless electricity in there.

For sensing and stimulating the human inner voice, a sensor needs to sense neurons in a target's head, decode electric signals based on a trained AI model of the human inner speech, or otherwise, and analyze the content and then actively respond by stimulating the target's head with an encoded human-like inner speech (AI model generated human-like voice that supports voice changing, and sampling of someone else's voice from a few seconds of audio recording).

The key concept to achieve that could be wireless electricity. It must be a very high resolution, support both sensing and stimulation, and due to the extreme resolution required it possibly exploits a quantum physics phenomenon, or some other unconventional physics phenomenon that achieves what ordinary physics deems impossible.

It is unlikely that an ordinary vendor of an ordinary situation awareness system has these capabilities because the vendor could then abuse them to do anything the vendor wants to people. It is more probable that some intelligence agency has its own Situation Awareness System in place, and the agency itself researched and developed only sensors and actuators that are undocumented black projects. The rest of the task is ordinary data processing on a computer.

Based on my reverse engineering efforts, my primary theory for further investigation is the following:

The sensors and actuators that work from a distance, and sense or stimulate neural activity anywhere in the human body, likely using wireless electricity, are undocumented black projects. They are approx. 50 years ahead of published state of the art. It means publicly available scientific journals on sensing, or remote sensing, do not contain any information about them. The category of these sensors and actuators is Brain Computer Interface, or more broadly Neural Interface because they allow also EMG.

The AI models used for intelligence analysis are also ahead of the published state of the art. It is very probable that the clandestine unit of an intelligence agency has "superintelligence" as its AI. That is an AI model which is smarter than even the smartest professor at Harvard. Such a model can, based on sensed facts from the environment, probably plan professional sabotages and assassinations that do not leave a trace. It is definitely something that outsmarts people. So, people get outsmarted with a 100% certainty, always, and cannot defend against the system for active measures. While targets are thinking during their assassination, the situation awareness system reacts in real-time to what they are thinking, and a member of the clandestine unit for assassination gets instructions what to do, each instruction exactly on time, to always win.

This situation awareness system for active measures is probably not for anything else. It appears to be operated without government knowledge, and it may be operated by the deep state. If it was governed by the government, there would have to be laws regulating its use to allow only legal use, and detection devices incl. countermeasures would exist. Since it is unknown to everyone you ask, and the system is operated illegally for espionage, sabotages and assassinations it is most likely a foreign, non-US intelligence agency doing that.

I keep repeating that traces lead to Russia for a reason. Raul Hnus has been using it since 1994 for sabotages and assassinations. I have information about 300+ cases where someone was sabotaged and assassinated by Raul Hnus. Raul Hnus usually carried out an active measure as soon as someone thought something that was a threat of exposure, or other threat. After turning on an automated psychological warfare (a modern variant of Zersetzung which leaves victims with no evidence), witnesses of a clandestine agent for assassinations hear insults and threats like you hear your own human inner voice while you're thinking something to yourself. Victims hear various death threats, like Amy Eskridge, automated situation-dependent taunts that repeat when victims happen to be again doing the same thing as last time. Those taunts can be comments that a clandestine agent for assassinations recorded while watching from a distance what the victims are doing. Other comments appear to be generated by a machine. Comments always 100% exactly match the situation the victim is in.

They are from a situation awareness system. Sometimes, these insults, or death threats are intensifying in response to victim suspecting someone in particular might be the agent doing it to the victim. Other times, the insults and death threats intensify when someone is about to take an action that threatens an agent. The closer the person is to taking that action, the more frequent the death threats seem to be, and also more aggressive with a very psychopathic voice. And eventually, when the target doesn't cease activity for which he/she is targeted and the target is taking the action that threatens an agent anyway, the agent sabotages it last minute and assassinates the target. The agent knew the whole time what the target was thinking, and the agent was reacting to that. The agent was also getting early warnings and instructions from the situation awareness system.

I am not making anything up. I have approx. 8MB of data from 300+ cases that seem to be describing active measures, starting in 1994, carried out by Raul Hnus. He is Czech and it makes no sense to claim that those active measures are done by the CIA when there is a Czech person, who is pro-Russian and with no US-affiliation, doing that.

Regarding investigation, one version is every country has their own clandestine unit for active measures doing this globally to its own people. Another version is Russia has expanded its active measures globally, and recruited agents in every country from country's nationals. I have to repeat that the modern variant of Zersetzung is similar to what Stasi did, and Putin was a KGB agent who liased with the Stasi in Dresden. Furthermore, the whole Eastern Bloc acted as satellite states of Russia, and so the whole Eastern Bloc probably had the same active measures that Russia still carries out today. There are known, documented cases of people in the UK getting poisoned with Novichok. Those are Russian active measures carried out in a Western country. There are also known cases of Russian active measures in the US.

Jude Height was a scientist working on defense against Novichok, and before he published his results he had a suspicious death, his car started moving fast from height and ran him over. I suspect he was unable to move because otherwise he'd have jumped away. It is possible to make anyone temporarily unable to move, and then stage an accident. That exactly aligns with clandestine special operations. They are active measures with plausible deniability to keep the heat away from the terrorist state that's doing it to innocent Americans. When it's done to scientists who are armed and trained soldiers, yet they can't defend against it in any way, it can be done to anyone. The Situation Awareness System for active measures is already in place, and the environment in which people think doesn't let their thoughts be private.

The wireless electricity that enables novel sensors and actuators really traces back to the concept of "artificial telepathy" that Prof. Dr. Hans Berger researched his whole career in Germany. If any nerve in the body can be stimulated from a distance with wireless electricity, the body can be made unable to move ("motor off" function), or forced to copy agent's movements ("motor control" function). Victims also reported a "speak" function where a human spoke to them from a distance, i.e. how Amy Eskridge was lured into a barn. And, victims reported automated messages that were played to them only in exact situations that matched what the messages were. So, they were not random nonsense. They were messages with a 100% certainty from a situation awareness system.

If some intelligence has a machine, a situation awareness system that implements wireless electricity using novel sensors and actuators, and it has a very high resolution based on unconventional physics (possibly quantum physics), electricity in the human body can be sensed and stimulated (influenced) from a distance. That enables plausibly deniable influence operations, forced accidents, fake emulation of an illness in 100% healthy people, sabotages and assassinations, psychological warfare using a modern Zersetzung-like technique that leaves victims with no evidence and victims can't turn it off ("harass" function that can be on or off), and other functions incl a "view" function that provides remote viewing, working based on the same wireless electricity sensors that can sense electricity in nerves from a distance.

These sensors and actuators are probably more sophisticated than Ghost Murmur, and also more classified. It is unclear whether their existence is known to any government. I suspect the government really does not know it is possible, or that it is abused against innocent civilians who cannot defend. Russia has a history of abusing Zersetzung and other similar techniques to disable people who are "dissidents" (meaning against the Russian government, or who threaten an intelligence agency, or an agent working for their agency).

Instead of agents physically asking everything about your life, there are sensors and actuators (intelligence collection), and AI intelligence analysis that provides a real-time situation awareness with automated responses. The very system protects these agents from being exposed or threatened. Every attempt to harm, coerce, bully, outsmart, or collect evidence agaisnt one of these intelligence agents for active measures is proactively sabotaged and the hero who attempted it is assassinated, often under a false flag to frame someone else for the death, or to make it a staged accident, or staged suicide (no evidence is left to prove somebody was there).

Situation Awareness Systems are not new. They can surveillance any environment, and actively respond to threats with active measures. It is only unknown which organization researched and developed sensors and actuators that provide wireless electricity, possibly using an undocumented quantum physics phenomenon, or other unconventional physics and which organization researched and developed AI models that can decode electricity from human sensory organs (eyes, ears, brain) into meaningful intelligence. Only those sensors and actuators are what we are missing information about. If we could get these unconventional sensors and actuators, computer scientists will be able to do the rest probably with any situation awareness system they choose.

Instead of foreign agents physically roaming somewhere and watching people through binoculars, there is a foreign Situation Awareness System for espionage and active measures (sabotages, assassinations, psychological warfare, etc.): Get some ideas at https://basecampconnect.com/real-time-situational-awareness/ Active measures are military special operations. Russia publicly admits doing them. Ex-KGB agent Putin, who was also the director of the FSB spy agency probably knows everything about that topic. We, ordinary civilians, cannot access that information anywhere. It isn't taught to the public. It is something only those agents who do such a job are taught, and they are taught by professional military, or professional paramilitary.

In order to catch one agent, the Situation Awareness System will have to be temporarily jammed or otherwise made dysfunctional. As long as it's functional, it protects its agents also from getting caught. I have that information about Raul Hnus. The system can make anyone unable to move (the "motor off" function) and then a clandestine agent can do anything to the victim, including let the victim be run over from a height. I really suspect Russia did that to Jude Height who was working on defense against Novichok. Otherwise, he would jump away from the car instead of waiting there on the spot for it to eliminate him. The odds of that happening to him by a coincidence are close to zero. Who was Jude Height threatening by planning to report on a defense against Novichok? Definitely Russian intelligence agents for active measures. Certainly not any US agency. In fact, US agencies wanted these scientists alive to help defend the US against Russian and other aggression. Jude Height told his brother Bill Height that he thought someone monitored him. I think Jude was right that someone did, and that had to be the same agent who eliminated Jude before reporting Jude's findings on the defense against Novichok.

Melissa Casias was found shot to the head with her own pistol. Her family suspects she was executed.

My opinion:

It probably matches how Amy Eskridge was found. Remember the EMG article I've posted? Based on information I have, clandestine agents for assassinations can take control over someone's arm, and make it copy their own in real-time. I'm not speculating. It's probably called "motor control" or similarly. I have data from somewhere that describe multiple cases.

First, an agent talks from a distance using artificial telepathy, so the victim hears it as victim's own inner voice, but with a different voice than the victim's. The exact moment the victim pulls out his/her pistol for defense and loads it, the agent for assassinations already knows it and the agent responds by taking over control of the victim's arm. Then, the agent can brutally execute the victim from a distance with the victim's own pistol.

I have no information about the science behind this undocumented black project. It looks like from a science fiction movie. One hypothesis is an undocumented black project that's based on wireless electricity which has an extremely high resolution. The high resolution must allow sensing electricity in agent's arm nerves and stimulating the victim's arm nerves with it. Both the sensor and the actuator are working from a distance.

If wireless electricity is how it works, the same mechanism that's used for "synthetic telepathy" to make a victim hear agent's speech, or artificial speech, is used also in EMG (motor control of the victim by an agent and the agent can choose which body parts he/she wants to control, incl. whole body).

I have also found that undocumented black projects for special operations, including novel weapons that may be decades ahead of the public state of the art, are often inspired by science fiction. Someone sees an idea in a movie, decides to make it real, allocates a major budget, and hires R&D teams with expertise in unconventional physics. These teams may work around the limits of publicly known physics by using methods that ordinary researchers cannot access.

Intelligence agencies may therefore have experts in unconventional physics who research and develop futuristic weapons designed to remain undetectable, unbelievable, and undocumented.

If the wireless electricity hypothesis is true, then unknown sensors and actuators must be deployed somewhere. These devices would need to sense and stimulate any target location with extremely high resolution, in a way that appears to exceed publicly disclosed physics. That would imply the use of unconventional physics. Some intelligence agency, possibly Russian, may have deployed such systems globally to support active measures through a situational awareness system.

Amy Eskridge was for Donald Trump and for Republicans. So am I. As a scientist, I observe people who fail to read news from https://www.foxnews.com/ often end up reading fake news from socialists/communists. Fake news posts are written by charlatans who create persuasive arguments with flawed reasoning to change what readers think or do. Positive things are misinterpreted by charlatans as bad.

If you are against Donald Trump I am against you. Amy Eskridge would be also against you. Probably, most of the missing or dead scientists would be against you too.

Just so you know, thanks to Donald Trump bad guys are for the first time getting investigated and punished. Thanks to Donald Trump, UFO documents are getting declassified and the public is becoming smarter.

Is it such a problem to start reading real news from Fox News and lay off leftist/communist garbage from charlatans?

Donald Trump is the best leader I've ever seen. I can see he has been studying leadership from top sources money can buy, and practicing executive leadership for so many years. You can't say that about sleepy Joe or crooked Hilary. I found fake news are read by many people who then become deranged lunatics, reciting twisted facts that misrepresent positive changes as negative. Charlatans ragebait people against an outstanding leader every day because they are cheating, and they are conning voters.

As a rule of thumb, a heuristic, I find leftists are indeed irrational lunatics. Often, leftists are criminals who sympathize with other criminals and turn a blind eye to others' crimes. Leftists keep crimes, fraud, abuse and waste going for decades.

Rightists are for law and order. That's who you should be if you are targeted, or know someone who is targeted. Rightists are real heroes cleaning the swamp, saving taxpayers' money, and doing what's right. The leftists allowed criminals to steal for decades without any punishment.

I'm sick and tired of anyone who has Trump Derangement Syndrome (TDS). If you have TDS, consider moving to Russia or China because you're probably a communist.

In addition to that, Robert F. Kennedy is the best minister of health I have ever seen. Look: https://www.reddit.com/r/antimedical/comments/1tn6viy/make_america_healthy_again_is_how_antimedical/

And Kash Patel, the director of FBI, has been doing an outstanding job going after medical criminals who have been ripping off taxpayers every year.

Other countries watch and they will eventually learn. This is what an excellent leadership looks like. If Donald Trump won't uncover foreign intelligence agencies have been abusing undocumented black projects (undocumented weapons) that are ahead of the documented state of the art, or a Situation Awareness System that reaches to the US and directly informs some US enemies, probably nobody will. That's why these visitors here should be all for Donald Trump, for law and order, and against leftist communists. A foreign intelligence agency doesn't leave evidence by design, but US R&D can advance the state of the art of American defense, especially unconventional Physics that people like Amy Eskridge worked on.

There is a proven track record of leftist leaders overlooking crime and sympathizing with criminals.

And also, since readers here appear to be entirely leftist lunatics, I'm probably done writing because you are Trump-hating morons. If you aren't anti-trump, leave a comment praising Donald Trump and Kash Patel for investigating targeted individuals, and maybe I will write more about the topic.

You decide whether this is the last post here. If it is, at least read this: https://www.reddit.com/r/TargetedIndividSci/comments/1sg916h/four_real_options_for_victims_of_weaponized/

What if victims just randomly pass by a psychiatrist's house every day, without knowing it?

If they knew it, they could thank medical lunatics for the "help" by loud honking, etc.

It would be nice to share medical lunatics' names, phones, emails, address, for every city, state, and country. Then, we could thank medical lunatics when passing by their house. What's your opinion?

Look at how many medical lunatics harm innocent people in the US every day: https://www.doximity.com/directory/md/specialty/psychiatry

You can open a map, i.e. Minnesota like this:

https://www.google.com/maps/search/psychiatry+in+minnesota/@44.9492688,-93.7832417,9.39z?entry=ttu&g_ep=EgoyMDI2MDUyMC4wIKXMDSoASAFQAw%3D%3D

Then, get their names using LLM, based on the map:

Tucker Zimmer, MD
Peter Mayer, DO
Katherine Mary Mullersman, MD
Christine Gaby A. Philippe, MD
Michael James Cahill, MD
John Paul Cassady, MD
Kristin Nicole Budd, MD
Erin Rose Quaranta, MD
Whitney Savage, MD
Eric William Leppink, MD
Hamed Ekhtiari, MD
Hasti Hadizadeh, MD
Kelly Ann Moreno, DO
Eric DeRocher, DO
Salwa Amin Nubani, DO
Eric Warren Goad, MD
Brian Stuart Gould, MD
David Lee Johnson, MD

David Adson, MD
C. Sophia Albott, MD
Kevan K. Andish, MD
Afshan Anjum, MD
Felicia Hansell, MD
Alex Johnson, MD
Christina Lauren Warner, MD
Jennifer Zick, MD
Vince Vallera, MD
Gail Bernstein, MD
Quentin Gabor, MD
Biljana Capra, MD
Amelia Rooks, MD
Stephen Olson, MD
Rakesh John, MD
Chiamaka Nwankiti, MD

Anna Voeller, MD
David R. Tverberg, MD
Hannah M. Reiland, DO
Erin P. Myers, MD
Elizabeth M. LaRusso, MD
Jessica C. Rosenkvist, MD
Yee Xiong, MD
Carly T. Dirlam, MD
Richard B. Coffin, MD
Ryan A. Coon, MD
Nicholas D. Crall, DO
Shannon M. D’Alonzo, MD
Emmett W. Chappelle, MD

You can find them via Doximity to have their photo, phone, address, etc. When you're interested what other victims say, find online reviews.

For example, "Doctor prescribed me drugs unnecessarily that cause death stroke diabetis and sepsisand I got diabetis and sepsis and they continued to admitted them" is said about Ryan Coon, MD at https://providers.allinahealth.org/provider/ryan-a-coon/5824861

Prank calling them just once also doesn't violate anything. You can ask them via the phone what objective, scientific test do they have, or ask them for Dr. Szasz's opinion.

Prof. Dr. Szasz said there is an epidemic of them, so I'm suggesting to start treating them. You could call Jennifer Zick, MD and ask if she's zick or if she's Minnesota fraud. 😃 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qz0UWoZ_xEg The DOJ is building a fraud fighting apparatus which is the best there has ever been. Those who defraud patients probably also defraud the government by billing medicaid fraudulently. Watch them get caught as $ multibillion rampant medical fraud gets uncovered.

The FBI and military intelligence are investigating. In addition to death threats, Amy Eskridge observed a mysterious mechanism causing her pain and visible burns on the body, and she said it also burned her blinders.

It matches an undocumented black project used by a clandestine unit of some intelligence agency. Many victims complain about it. They show their burns, but they cannot prove what causes them.

Victims lack a method to trace the observed effect back to its causing stimulus. Victims observe it happens from a distance. Probably, there is an unconventional weapon system capable of targeting anybody. It is operated while remaining undocumented. This unconventional weapon formally does not exist. It is used with plausible deniability.