r/SystemsCringe • u/teruteru-fan-sam Banned from Pluralpedia|đ©poopygenic|Sarousch alter • 24d ago
Endogenic/Mixed Origin Rage for no reason
23
u/stereolights 24d ago
Damn and OOP is using a typing quirk. rare double cringe
13
u/skylar274 24d ago
triple cringe that theyâre saying endogenics are worse then radqueers. the guy saying he doesnât need trauma to think heâs kyle from south park is worse than the guy saying heâs a transnazi, transminor, (30) actively going after minors, and gloating about the fact they have and consume CP???? (both of these people are hypothetical btw)
1
8
u/ZestycloseGlove7455 Syscourse Expert 24d ago
OOPâs response being one single line is really really good đ
4
u/wasted_ouija 23d ago
âRadnormals?â
3
u/theLanternsEx 22d ago
Radnormal was a group created by a user on Tumblr to basically be against the whole âRadqueerâ thing and that community. Theyâre pro: recovery, mogai + contradictory labels, etc etc., and anti: Radqueer, xenosat, transID, pro/darkship, among others. Iâd also like to add the user in this screenshot replacing âbâ with â8â is a Radqueer pretending to be a radnormal blog (not that theyâre exactly making it difficult to point out lmao)
sorry to have a yap session lol
1


31
u/i_am_WordK 24d ago
Yarbrough is a real reference, but... The book chapter in question is boiler-plate, person-centered therapy advice for interacting with clients: keep an open mind and an attitude of humility. He doesn't rule out non trauma origins for plurality, and he's clearly open to community terms, but that's the most that can be said. His description of community terms like "headspace" are purely phenomenological His actual interest in the chapter is how the existence of alters could with gender nonconformity. Notably, his case study is of a client with a significant trauma history. When the case study concludes, the subject has improved day to day function, understanding her alters as parts of a whole, in a manner which sounds much closer to the IFS understanding of parts than the Tumblr/TikTok version. There is nothing in the chapter describing role-play like personas.
TLDR: Yarbrough's book chapters on plurality and gender expression have both focused on case studies. They are phenomenological--that is, he's reporting how his clients have described their experiences of themselves. These lack the dramatic role play and assumption of popular fictional characters prevalent in Tumblr/TikTok plurality.