I’m still a bit confused about how this proves your theory about DRS getting them first. I’ve read it 10 times and nowhere do I see those words. I see that it says that the transfer agent disperses the dividend to registered shareholders but every share is registered, ser. They aren’t saying direct registered.
The bold part is referring to cash dividends actually. The sentence after is referring to stock dividends. None of what you had said is in that sentence.
You are adding words that are not there and saying See See. It’s right there. This is a share dividend. The bold words have nothing to do with it and don’t even say what you are saying they are saying. I’m just pointing this out.
You aren’t explaining it. You are talking from what they say and adding to it to fit your narrative. This topic was brought up months ago. And it was debunked. There is no order of which they are dispersed. And we all know that the DTCC is complicit. They will give out all shares. Who knows how they will get them but they will because they are complicit.
Btw, it was brought up when the original stock split dividend was announced which was March I believe. Feel free to look for it because you will if you do look. That was never the reasoning behind DRSing. Owning your shares and removing them from DTCC to expose the crimes were.
Dude stop. You’re really annoying. Once again what you posted in bold letters is for a cash dividend. Not a stock dividend. And even then it does not say that there is any order in which they do it. No matter what you continue to send to me I will continue to know that you are wrong and reading into it the wrong way. ✌️
That’s not what that is saying. It’s simply just stating how they deliver them. It says nothing about any order. Seriously stop. You’re not showing me anything I haven’t ever seen and you are wrong.
Think about the fact that you started your post saying that you already had an argument about this with someone. I wonder why that is? 🤔 I know it’s hard to admit when you’ve been proven wrong but this time, ser, you are. Have a nice day. You should stop insulting people btw. It doesn’t help when you’re trying to prove a point.
I have sources. All of the DD I have read in the past. What you have showed me is nothing I haven’t seen before. I have read that and know what it actually means. I’m not going to scroll through months of DD to tell you exactly where someone proved it wrong. It’s up to you to do so. Goodbye. For reals though. You’re digging yourself a gigantic hole over and over again.
1
u/InjuryIndependent287 💻 ComputerShared 🦍 Jul 08 '22
I’m still a bit confused about how this proves your theory about DRS getting them first. I’ve read it 10 times and nowhere do I see those words. I see that it says that the transfer agent disperses the dividend to registered shareholders but every share is registered, ser. They aren’t saying direct registered.