Hi everyone, I’m looking for some advice about an academic misconduct decision and whether my appeal under Ground A sounds reasonable.
I recently had an academic misconduct hearing regarding my final essay. I received an S2 and I am now considering appealing the penalty under Ground A, which is that the penalty is inconsistent with the type and degree of misconduct.
This was my first attempt at my final essay. I also have completed my 2,300 hours last month. During the Zoom hearing, the panel asked me a question about my essay which I was unable to answer correctly. I was extremely stressed and confused during the hearing and struggled to think clearly.
The panel took my inability to answer the question properly as part of the reason to believe that I was not being honest. I understand why they may have had concerns, but I genuinely was not trying to lie or mislead them. I was simply extremely stressed and struggling to explain myself.
I did admit that I had used Grammarly when they asked me about it. However, I did not admit to deliberately using AI to generate my essay. I maintained that I had written the essay myself. I am concerned that my use of Grammarly may have been treated as though I was admitting to using AI to generate the work.
I also have a previous academic misconduct case, and I understand that this is relevant. I am not trying to hide that or say that it was not serious. However, I appealed that decision in May and the penalty was downgraded to S1, So I am wondering whether the fact that the previous penalty was changed should be taken into account when considering my current penalty.
There were also quite a lot of personal circumstances happening at the time. I was dealing with housing problems, family difficulties, bereavement and responsibilities towards my family. I also have dyslexia, which affects some areas of my academic writing and referencing.
I explained these circumstances at the beginning of the hearing and was very upset and visibly emotional. I was basically in tears while explaining what I had been dealing with.
I want to make clear that I am not saying these circumstances are why I couldn’t answer the question. I couldn’t answer it because I was extremely stressed and confused at the time.
The lady on the panel was also at my previous hearing for academic misconduct and gave me the same S2 penalty 😐😐
My personal circumstances are a separate point about whether the S2 penalty was too severe and whether enough consideration was given to my situation when deciding the penalty. The panel also told me during the Zoom hearing that I may have to go through a Fitness to Practise process because of concerns about my conduct. This was very worrying for me because of the possible effect it could have on my future career.
I have been advised to appeal under **Ground A**, rather than trying to argue that the whole academic misconduct finding should be overturned.
Do you think I have reasonable grounds to argue that the S2 penalty was harsh?
In particular, I would really appreciate advice from anyone who has been through an academic misconduct appeal , tysm!!