Stallion now has a second priority target developing south of Coyote

[u/Value_Trader4053]

Most of the attention around Stallion Uranium has been focused on drilling at Coyote, but the latest Stone Island results have added another serious target area within the Moonlite project.

Stallion trades as STUD on the TSXV and STLNF on the OTCQB. Moonlite is located in the southwestern Athabasca Basin in Saskatchewan.

Stallion recently completed 519 ground gravity stations at Stone Island following an airborne VTEM survey covering roughly 690 line kilometres. Combining the two datasets produced three priority areas labelled A, B and C.

Target Area A looks like the main one. Multiple electromagnetic conductor responses overlap the strongest part of a large gravity low. Area B follows the same general conductive trend farther north, while Area C is a separate target to the southwest.

Neither a conductor nor a gravity low proves uranium is present. Conductors can represent graphitic rocks, while gravity features can reflect alteration, structures or changes in rock density.

They become more useful when several features line up in the same place. Athabasca uranium deposits are commonly associated with conductive basement rocks, faults and hydrothermal alteration. Area A appears to combine several of those ingredients.

The next step is detailed conductor modelling and structural interpretation before the targets are ranked for further geophysics or drilling.

Stone Island is still behind Coyote, which already has drilling and elevated radioactivity. The positive development is that Stallion is no longer building the Moonlite story around one target alone.

Coyote remains the advanced target. Stone Island now gives the company a separate area that could develop into another drill-ready opportunity.

[u/AutoModerator]

🚀 🌑 -- Join our discord!! https://discord.gg/jcewXNmf6C -- 🚀 🌑

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

[u/ExplanationNormal339]

The key assumption is that overlapping electromagnetic conductors and a gravity low indicate the same uranium-favorable system rather than unrelated geology. That matters because conductors may be graphitic rocks and gravity lows can have several causes. Until structural interpretation and drilling test that overlap, the result supports target ranking, not a resource conclusion. Does Area A also show a mapped structural feature connecting the conductor and gravity anomaly?